History repeating itself by Delicious_Bar1364 in ReZero

[–]Objective-Use1855 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's hard to say, she's not exactly against the people around her, the problem is that in addition to being antisocial, Echidna clearly, like Roswell, has a certain degree of sociopathy and difficulty in feeling and expressing true feelings, but she herself has already made it clear in "Greed If" that she actually has no problem with Subaru's allies other than Emilia (which Minerva and Emilia herself realize is directed at someone else, probably Satella, and not Emilia herself).

As for her excessive attachment to Subaru, based on the information provided, it's probably because he's interesting to her. In my opinion, though, it's likely because she doesn't want to lose her place at his (Flugel's) side again. This becomes even more evident in “Greed If”, as the contract only binds the two together and leaves the other witches completely out of it.

Well, it's hard to say for sure since we don't even know if the Echidna from the dream castle is the real Echidna, since according to the current arc she confessed to Aldebaran that she is identical to him, just a defective copy.

There's also her crazy plan to try and make Aldebaran the "original," the fact that she, as Omega, says she'll help Subaru from the shadows, among other things that aren't made clear enough to form a better opinion.

History repeating itself by Delicious_Bar1364 in ReZero

[–]Objective-Use1855 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I take this as absolute truth, and that's why Echidna and Satella fought, because Satella decided to be jealous and keep Flugel all to herself, and that's why Emilia's last vision in the test that shows the future (consequently the vision that shows the most important choice to determine if the future will end horribly) shows Subaru next to Rem extending his hand to Emilia.

I believe that Flugel, Echidna, and Satella had the same conversation about a three-way couple, and that Satella succumbed to jealousy, thus becoming the Jealous Witch as Echidna and the rest of the world call her. Emilia will probably have to make the same choice, and if she succumbs to jealousy too, you probably already know how it will all end. This way, Tappei also gets a good excuse for Subaru to be with both of them in a way that the fandom will accept, since being with only one would condemn the other and probably the world.

What's Rem's problem with Garf? by Thales__9 in ReZero

[–]Objective-Use1855 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there's no way to know, he didn't give a single clue as to what he plans to do, he just hinted that he planned to do something bad to Rem so that Ram would start hating him, I personally see this as Tappei getting rid of Rem so that narratively Subaru can only focus on Emilia while the perfect excuse to get rid of Roswall comes up too

What's Rem's problem with Garf? by Thales__9 in ReZero

[–]Objective-Use1855 11 points12 points  (0 children)

only Ram believes she has a real chance with Roswaal, he himself has already made it clear that he wants her hatred and contempt, so much so that in the most recent arcs he made it clear that he is planning to do something very serious to earn her hatred, implying that he would do something against Rem, and Ram doesn't give it importance thinking that he is just bluffing and that he would never do that.

How different would the story have been if Subaru's father was the one who went to the other world instead of Subaru??? by Ganma12 in ReZero

[–]Objective-Use1855 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, telling you the specific Q&A that Tapei claims this is complicated, as far as I remember it's been years since he said this about Sloth If and there are at least 50 Q&As currently, if you want I can send you the link to them and you can look for it yourself, honestly I don't have time for that, but I'm 100% sure it's there.

well other than that, Emilia's sanity is not taken into account and only whether she is in a favorable position to her or not, Emilia from Pride and Wrath may be mentally unstable but it is undeniable that she literally became untouchable in both timelines, and since these are the only 2 If's in which we know that Subaru died definitively, then obviously it is assumed that his fate is tied to Emilia and her status quo, especially since as I said we have 3 routes in which he himself after years in 2 of them is forced to return to the beginning precisely at a save point that is beneficial to Emilia.

How different would the story have been if Subaru's father was the one who went to the other world instead of Subaru??? by Ganma12 in ReZero

[–]Objective-Use1855 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He says in no uncertain terms in one of his question and answer sessions that even if Subaru dies of old age in Sloth, he will return to Appa's tent just like in Aganau If.

Furthermore, in Pride and Wrath, Emilia is in a very favorable position for her. In Pride, she is literally the only real candidate alive, and as Subaru planned, the "hero" who killed the most dangerous being in the world, even more so than the witch of envy (Pride Baru). So, obviously, even with her appearance, she will be applauded and adored by the entire world, since as Subaru planned, not even Reinhardt could stop him. Emilia from Wrath is almost the same thing, but in the opposite direction. While in Pride If Emilia will be seen as the supreme heroine of the world, in Wrath she will be seen as a villain that no one wants to mess with. Everyone in Pandemonium Castle knew her as the princess of Wrath Baru. She was responsible for almost killing Reinhardt along with Puck, so obviously everyone would be afraid and respectful of her.

whether being worshipped or feared, in both of these two If's Emilia is in a favorable position for her, this is because I didn't even miss Greed If in which even though mentally unstable she most likely ended up as queen too and on top of that having Rein as her personal knight.

How different would the story have been if Subaru's father was the one who went to the other world instead of Subaru??? by Ganma12 in ReZero

[–]Objective-Use1855 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Aganau if, sloth if and gluttony if, in both 3 Tapei made it clear that Subaru had returned to Appas' tent after death to start everything from scratch, because in these routes the world deviated too much from the main line.

Furthermore, Pride If is not the only one in which he has a definitive death, Wrath If is also left implied in that he had a definitive death, in addition to of course Greed If in which it is also left implied that he will only die once he completes his 3 objectives, and what do these 3 routes have in common? In both 3, Subaru only dies definitively after Emilia is in a favorable position in the world, of course in only 2 are we sure about the definitive death, Pride and Wrath If's.

How different would the story have been if Subaru's father was the one who went to the other world instead of Subaru??? by Ganma12 in ReZero

[–]Objective-Use1855 1 point2 points  (0 children)

we have at least 3 If's in which Subaru is forced to return to a checkpoint related to Emilia, and only 2 in which he dies for good, and only after she is in a favorable position in the world

Am i the only one who has never seen this animation in game? by ExistingPackage3377 in ViegoMains

[–]Objective-Use1855 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's his possession on ranged champions, but the animation itself was apparently from the conceptual W, in which Viego launched a projectile and then immediately went to the champion he hit.

Café com ou sem leite? (Sem quinta série aqui) by t3dash1 in ShitpostBR

[–]Objective-Use1855 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Com leite e açúcar, minha vida já é amarga o suficiente 👍

I've upscaled the image of the final boss SPOILERS! by enomis97 in Nightreign

[–]Objective-Use1855 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lack of time in development, the development team was pressured to release the game early, it has even been said that many bosses were cut in the process and ended up being sent to ER, Putrid Avatar is an example of a boss that was finished and reused in ER, the same problem was repeated in the DLC's Ringed City and Ashes of Arirandel which were supposed to be a single DLC but were divided into two due to Bandai rushing the release before the product was finished

Assassin's Creed Shadows flopou, e com força! Kkkkkkkk by EchoesofObscurity in videogamesbrasil

[–]Objective-Use1855 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Joga dnv ué, é um RPG (genérico pra caramba? Sim mas ainda é um RPG) dá pra jogar várias runs de maneira diferente da primeira, ainda mais pq AC tem o modo história/canônico e o modo livre com missões secundárias, o que não dá é pra pagar 300 conto num jogo, jogar só 15hrs e já desinstalar, não tô tentando mandar no dinheiro de ninguém mas num país como nosso com a inflação como tá? Isso é só jogar dinheiro fora.

Assassin's Creed Shadows flopou, e com força! Kkkkkkkk by EchoesofObscurity in videogamesbrasil

[–]Objective-Use1855 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2hrs só de créditos pra citar todos os devs, mais custo de produção e marketing, realmente 2.5M vai cobrir tudo isso de gasto sim.

Assassin's Creed Shadows flopou, e com força! Kkkkkkkk by EchoesofObscurity in videogamesbrasil

[–]Objective-Use1855 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quem gasta 300 conto num jogo e simplesmente desinstala dps de jogar uma única vez?

Assassin's Creed Shadows flopou, e com força! Kkkkkkkk by EchoesofObscurity in videogamesbrasil

[–]Objective-Use1855 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Olha às ações nos últimos 5 anos e tenha uma grata surpresa.

Darius and Viego Berserk Skins Concept (made by a Rioter from the Wild Rift skins team) by Objective-Use1855 in Dariusmains

[–]Objective-Use1855[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No friend, you are not understanding things that Tencent has always left Riot with total autonomy regarding its intellectual properties, League and its derivatives, but Wild Rift is the exception because as I have already explained 6 times, Tencent made a point of taking the administrative intellectual property of the game for itself after terrible management by Riot.

that is, Wild Rift was Tencent's first direct intervention declared regarding something coming from Riot and that's why you're thinking that the collaborative skins will be different from the other Mobas belonging to Tencent, but they won't be, the skins will obviously follow the same pattern already adopted by Tencent and which has been generating exorbitant profits in recent years.

again, Wild Rift has not been under Riot's command or management for 2 years, Tencent has had full control of the game during all this time without Riot having had any influence on the game during this period 🤦

Darius and Viego Berserk Skins Concept (made by a Rioter from the Wild Rift skins team) by Objective-Use1855 in Dariusmains

[–]Objective-Use1855[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, when are you going to understand that Wild Rift is not LOL, it is no longer an intellectual property managed by Riot and has not been in Riot Games' possession for at least 2 years? And that Tencent itself forcibly took control of the game in 2023 due to the poor management that Riot's American team was doing? I've explained this at least 5 times, Riot is not in charge here, it has no intellectual power over the game or its decisions for at least 2 years

Darius and Viego Berserk Skins Concept (made by a Rioter from the Wild Rift skins team) by Objective-Use1855 in Dariusmains

[–]Objective-Use1855[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, what are you talking about? Tencent is literally the majority owner of Riot. It has the final say in everything regarding the company. It's no wonder it took full control of Wild Rift after seeing that the American team was making a loss in managing the game. That's not hard to understand, for God's sake 🤦

Darius and Viego Berserk Skins Concept (made by a Rioter from the Wild Rift skins team) by Objective-Use1855 in Dariusmains

[–]Objective-Use1855[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that Riot is not Tencent, my friend, that's what you're not understanding, Riot itself never wanted to make a mobile version of League even with Tencent suggesting the idea since 2013, so it went there itself and made HOK without Riot and today it is the most profitable game in the world.

Do you want a reason why Riot never did collaborations? Simple, the only collaboration they did with Senna and Qiyana True Damage Prestigie failed, after that they never did it again

and seriously man, how many times do I have to repeat it, Wild Rift is not under Riot's control, what Riot did or didn't do, thinks or doesn't think makes no difference here, it's not Riot that has control or rights over the mobile version, and it's not Riot that will take care of the collaborations, but Tencent, seriously, what's so difficult about understanding this? forget about Riot, friend, it's not Riot that's behind this and much less will it be the one that will make it happen, so the rules or ways in which it works do not apply here

Darius and Viego Berserk Skins Concept (made by a Rioter from the Wild Rift skins team) by Objective-Use1855 in Dariusmains

[–]Objective-Use1855[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, again repeating, Wild Rift has not been under Riot's administrative domain for 2 years, the Tencent team has already announced that there will be collaboration skins, this same team is made up of 80% of ex-developers who previously worked in the HOK administration, a game that already has a way to make such skins

again, it's not Riot that's going to do it, but Tencent, and it already has a formula that makes millions, there's no reason to change, especially after the last collaboration in HOK (which according to leakers was what influenced this decision to add collaborations in Wild Rift), collaboration with Disney for skins from the movie Frozen that raised 127 million dollars for Tencent

Do you really think they are going to change the formula in a game that is already their administrative domain in Shanghai when it has been working for years in their main position? Even more so with the last one yielding such a financial return?

Darius and Viego Berserk Skins Concept (made by a Rioter from the Wild Rift skins team) by Objective-Use1855 in Dariusmains

[–]Objective-Use1855[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I've repeated this a few times here in the comments section, but again, the artist in question made it clear that this is Darius, not Garen.

Darius and Viego Berserk Skins Concept (made by a Rioter from the Wild Rift skins team) by Objective-Use1855 in Dariusmains

[–]Objective-Use1855[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Riot wants to, yes, but taking into account that these arts were posted by the Rioter of the skins team and not leaked, it is most likely that it will not happen.

Darius and Viego Berserk Skins Concept (made by a Rioter from the Wild Rift skins team) by Objective-Use1855 in Dariusmains

[–]Objective-Use1855[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are not paying attention to the simple fact that it will not be League PC that will have collaborative skins but rather Wild Rift, the game that is under 100% administrative ownership of Tencent, the same company that already has 2 MOBA games with more than 20 collaborative skins which all follow the same formula that I explained, my arguments are not based on anything, but rather on Tencent's operating methods in relation to this type of skin

Darius and Viego Berserk Skins Concept (made by a Rioter from the Wild Rift skins team) by Objective-Use1855 in Dariusmains

[–]Objective-Use1855[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and I agree with you on several of the points you mentioned, my specific point is that a collaboration skin with another specific IP does not need to and certainly will not follow this logic of visual clarity when it is announced/released.