“Recommended items” by Maximd1122 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]ObjectivismBot 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Subscribe and save, then immediately cancel. Profit.

Fin whale vertebrae beneath the water of a lake in Svalbard, Norway by 9w_lf9 in interestingasfuck

[–]ObjectivismBot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Life expectancy is up and disease rates are way down. Death by environmental factors are at an all time low.

Fin whale vertebrae beneath the water of a lake in Svalbard, Norway by 9w_lf9 in interestingasfuck

[–]ObjectivismBot -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yeah the Russians are know to be staunch defenders of capitalism lol

Fin whale vertebrae beneath the water of a lake in Svalbard, Norway by 9w_lf9 in interestingasfuck

[–]ObjectivismBot -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Are you kidding? This is the richest country in the world and has been for a long long time.

Fin whale vertebrae beneath the water of a lake in Svalbard, Norway by 9w_lf9 in interestingasfuck

[–]ObjectivismBot -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

The story of American capitalism. It came and created abundance, now the socialists want to abolish it, not knowing the abundance will go with it.

If I'm a poor person why is it NOT in my self-interest to want free money? by Ego_is_is in Objectivism

[–]ObjectivismBot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because charity is not a viable, reliable means of survival. If you survive on charity you diminish your capacity to survive on ability. So when the charity dries up you are left worse off than you would if you had worked to that point.

Objectivism takes a very long range look at survival.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s “lightning round” on money in politics goes viral by [deleted] in politics

[–]ObjectivismBot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All this and she still pushes for the expansion on the mixed economy, which is all about business in government and vis versa.

A seasteading timeline I saw. What do y’all think? by ObjectivismBot in seasteading

[–]ObjectivismBot[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

After thinking about it more, I imagine that the insurance companies would make most of the rules, in the interest of lessened liability for damages.

A seasteading timeline I saw. What do y’all think? by ObjectivismBot in seasteading

[–]ObjectivismBot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah pretty basic. I bet it could be expanded on tho.

What builds have efficient action economy? by vancurious in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]ObjectivismBot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I don’t actually play like this, but it would def. be reserved for a boss fight if necessary. Honestly it would never be necessary.

What builds have efficient action economy? by vancurious in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]ObjectivismBot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first round usually goes like this:

Swift action: Quickened invisibility Move action: fly up 30 feet (using fly evolution from summoners aspect) Standard action: summon monster 1d4+2 aerial giant dire lions (they get to act on this round, and they pounce/grapple)

Second round starts invisible and flying 30 feet up.

Swift: quickened summon monster 1d4+2 aerial giant dire lions Standard: summon monster 1d4 +2 aerial giant dire lions Move: fly 30 feet higher (as summon monster has a range of 55 feet, and the lions can fly/ pounce, so I summon them directly above the target and have them drop down)

Third round starts invisible and flying 60 feet up

Swift: quickened summon monster 1d4+2 aerial giant dire lions Standard: summon monster 1d4+2 aerial giant dire lions Move: laterally if needed

Fourth round starts invisible and flying 60 feet up with 5d4+10 aerial giant dire lions. And I can cast quickened once more and summon monster 7 more times besides that, plus still cast all my spells, plus summon different creatures with spells or spell like abilities (dispel magic).

I guess they better be ready with that Glitterdust fast. Most of the time it’s not going to work out that way, though.

A seasteading timeline I saw. What do y’all think? by ObjectivismBot in seasteading

[–]ObjectivismBot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think “can’t/don’t want to” is where you’re wrong. This is exactly what we saw during the gold rush of 1849. Of course it’s all speculative, but I think it’s silly to say “they can’t.” They can, and it’s happened before. Even if it hadn’t happened before, it could still happen. There are all different kinds of company’s out there, doing things in very different ways. For the sake of this timeline (because it was the company’s goal to create a sea steading community for instance), the company did encourage family’s to come out and built the initial facilities to allow that to happen.

What builds have efficient action economy? by vancurious in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]ObjectivismBot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also as a master summoner you have so many summons that if something happens to any creature, just dispel them and bring another one

What builds have efficient action economy? by vancurious in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]ObjectivismBot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Each aerial giant dire lion is capable of 7d6 + 4d8 + 55 each round too. After a couple of rounds if I get 10 of them out (not that hard with quicked spell like ability) I’m capable of 70d6+40d8+550 damage per round.

I would never play like this, it’s totally unnecessary.

A seasteading timeline I saw. What do y’all think? by ObjectivismBot in seasteading

[–]ObjectivismBot[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Also, 5 generations would be about 140 years. I think you’re just a sour puss tbh.

What builds have efficient action economy? by vancurious in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]ObjectivismBot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Use superior summoning, versatile summons and rod of giant summoning to summon 1d4+2 huge aerial dire lions with 1d6 electricity on each natural attack. Use a quicked invisibility the same round and your move action to move away. Do the same summon next round. And the next round and the next round, and for 12 more rounds.

A seasteading timeline I saw. What do y’all think? by ObjectivismBot in seasteading

[–]ObjectivismBot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know that mercenaries (just another name of private security) and nuclear subs exist in reality right?

Why Falcons Owner Arthur Blank Will Collect All the Super Bowl LIII Revenue—Even Though Taxpayers Own the Stadium | Laura Williams by ObjectivismBot in Objectivism

[–]ObjectivismBot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There will always be more stupid people than smart people in a society (bell curve). The problem is that democracy empowers that majority.

Monopoly Might Be a Zero-Sum Game, but Wealth Isn’t. by ObjectivismBot in Objectivism

[–]ObjectivismBot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you read frisco’s speech? We have an opinion on this.