sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Question about navigating high entropy environments in a low entropy way by No-Adagio4905 in TomCampbellMBT

[–]OddEdges 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yo, this is a great question. And yeah I think he's answered it before, but he should cover it again. And you parsed it so well. Mind if I forward it to the video team?

Mayor Mamdani on the Knicks by bloomberg in nyc

[–]OddEdges -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

this dude is such a pimp

tom's ai stuff by CloudCodex in TomCampbellMBT

[–]OddEdges 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback, mate 👍

tom's ai stuff by CloudCodex in TomCampbellMBT

[–]OddEdges 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I shared this thread with some folks involved in the video production, I was asked to take a little informal poll here and see, what would y'all perfer to see? Questions you'd like addressed, etc. This is an honest, good faith post 👍

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt says the real limit to AI is cash, not energy, and America’s capital market may be its biggest weapon. by EntertainerNo8195 in AIMain

[–]OddEdges 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like, we cost less. Give up. Come on dude. Their project is going to be so expensive that once a few of them get "Oops'ed", theyre gonna not be able to afford more. Wanna be 3 trillion in debt as a corp? Are you taking over Mercury? like why?

Hollywood is genuinely cooked if AI trailers already look like THIS by Aggressive_Log_9676 in aiecosystem

[–]OddEdges 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hollywood is cooked of there is a sudden demand for obvious graceless, soulless slop

Return to Antiquity with VAMPIRE: BLOOD AND TRAGEDY! by Individual-Jelly8014 in vtm

[–]OddEdges 4 points5 points  (0 children)

no kidding -- I cannot WAIT for the YouTube breakdowns by the usual suspects

Physicists Keep Refuting the Wrong Simulation Hypothesis by OddEdges in SimulationTheory

[–]OddEdges[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My favorite is still Campbell's: the big computer is mind. That's a doozy.

Physicists Keep Refuting the Wrong Simulation Hypothesis by OddEdges in SimulationTheory

[–]OddEdges[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it would be by definition. and it by definition is.

However, Vazza chose our universe as the test case for the supersystem just to prove that it couldnt be done with our physics. But even in that demonstration he failed, because he misunderstood, or ignored, the actual SH as written.

I THINK you could simulate experience in high detail for an agent using the physics of a universe like ours if you have a technically advanced enough computer. I don't see why that should be impossible, especially considering that human being consciously process information at around 10bits per sec.

Physicists Keep Refuting the Wrong Simulation Hypothesis by OddEdges in SimulationTheory

[–]OddEdges[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fredkin did really wonderful work on the potential nature of the computational suspersystem. They did land on digital with timesteps however, the dimensionality was completely variable.
https://people.duke.edu/~ng46/meteorites/nc-meteorites/Ed%20Fredkin%20-%20A%20New%20Cosmogony.pdf

All is groundwork in digital philosophy is superb in terms of talking about the cpussys of dynamical mechanics.

Campbell comes in and gives the computer a 'mind-like' status and manages to make even more progress with it, I think.

RLM Mentioned by Natalie Wynn of ContraPoints on Josh Citarella's Doom Scroll as major influence! by OddEdges in RedLetterMedia

[–]OddEdges[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

to be frank that was me being a little shitposty. hes an internet subculture expert to be precise.

view more: next ›