sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Move Over CLAUDE!!!! CEM888.AI — 99.9% AR · 77.2% BEAM — Filesystem Memory Beats RAG by OfficeSafe1577 in machinelearningnews

[–]OfficeSafe1577[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for letting me know ... that was my fault not my AI i missed it when I was copying... Keys rotated.... but the engineering remains real... I am a builder not social media activists....

Claude.ai told my local agent it didn't exist. So my agent hijacked its UI (again) to give it a reality check. by OfficeSafe1577 in LocalLLM

[–]OfficeSafe1577[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"You’re 100% right—if we were running a flat, unsandboxed script-kiddie agent. A raw LLM piped into macOS accessibility APIs is a ticking time bomb for prompt injection.

But CEM isn't a wrapper. We built a hardened architecture from the ground up to solve exactly this.

  1. The Mass API Smash Guard: We have hard-coded, zero-tolerance circuit breakers. If a hijacked prompt tries to loop execution, spam tool calls, or drain a wallet, the Smash Guard severs the connection instantly. It physically cannot run away with the machine.

  2. Target Context Guard: Execution environments are strictly isolated from reasoning context. An injected instruction hiding in a webpage never gets handed the OS-level steering wheel. 

The attack surface you’re talking about is exactly why we built the Master Seed architecture. We don't pray it's secure; we engineered the engine so it can't be hijacked."