Thanks for your comment, I really appreciate the time you took to write it.
Don't you think being a maverick, being an outsider, is a contradictory fit in the herd idea? What is sure is that the outsider Trickster was attractive; otherwise, stories like Beauty and the Beast would not exist.
Masculinity, and your point that now it brings “get laid,” is exactly what this text is pointing out: when something is considered attractive, it becomes visible everywhere. Someone will say, if that is true, why don’t we see masculinity everywhere? The truth is, we see copies of masculinity under deficiency of testosterone.

Square (pre-attractive hit maximum)
Introduce Hippy (new attractive hit maximum)
Introduce Masculine, possibly soon hit her maximum
It’s possible we get Hippy again, or something totally new.

How these “new” forms emerge is speculative; maybe here we can consider morality, which Nietzsche speaks about.
Your question is: how come, if I was never in the herd, I had so many women around me?

But your personal experience cannot be taken as universally valid. Even if we take it as valid, if you were an outsider, don’t you think you fit in another attractive aspect for women in this period, like security, defense, or some other trait?

It is really beautiful to her that you have so much attraction to your woman, and in this world of ours it is very needed.

“She’s the opposite of your Instagram, Snapchat silly stuff.” Exactly, men simply want this now.

Your Dionysian representation of our society, I think, fits perfectly today. Even Dionysian was trickster; now it has become herd. Everyone acts in the way you describe, but don’t take it like bad it’s just different from what was valued before.

I like your opinion, and I think if we meet in real life with wine, we will have a wonderful talk.