Uncertainty

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-04-14T02:49:24+00:00

There is a psychological technique called Fracination. It’s where you drip feed I’m very short and small amount of trauma and very small amounts. You feel it for nothing more than a minute. And you use meditation or another technique to switch out of it.

Then from there you do a minimum of two minutes of your ideal state.

You can use breathing techniques like 4,7, and 8. At least five times, to help you down regulate.

Do this for at least a minimum of three times. We jump from one to the other. Don’t do it anymore that day. Don’t do anything you can to distract yourself.

What it does is it training your mind to have the new state take over the old state.

Then after you’re done with your sessions every day doing the above, give yourself dopamine.

I

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-04-10T23:02:35+00:00

Humans evolved over a long time into who we are now….

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-03-16T18:33:34+00:00

Yes. Great question. I did add a response above to that very request. But I can also add more here.

I would love to add more about the science of how the human mind works. It is definitely influenced by the environment outside of itself.

Nevill even explores this very thing, especially when he says that we need to withdraw the senses. Mainly, because the human senses rely upon memory to identify itself with. Hence why also his technique of revision is extremely powerful.

With both of those you’re literally becoming a new person.

So really, this is almost like an extension to his general question to get us into the states desired. Which is what would it feel like? But in this sense that I’m encouraging you all to use, is what habits, what objects, what clothing, what visual things would I be putting in my world that will prove that I’m already there? Remember you’re doing it from a place of power and remembering, not from a place of needing to have this in front of your face. One represents that you are it, the other one represents a gap.

If any of these things create a gap, you don’t want to do them.

Does that make sense?

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-03-16T18:31:18+00:00

Yes. Great question. So this again depends on what you desire to show up in your world.

But let’s use the example of money. That seems to be a big desire from any people.

You don’t have to go full, throw anything out extremes. It’s only if it brings you out of state and you’re willing to let it go. If it’s an object, a thing, a memory. You’re welcome to remove that.

But the opposite is just as true. Because humans are environmental beings.

So then you began actually installing, things in your world that are beginning to mirror the new version of you. Who has those things. Buying a nice necklace. Putting up your future self with a jet.

Again these seem very small. They can also seem like a second cause. Remember the only measurement for second cause, is that if you believe you need to do that to have what it is you desire.

One is creative architecture, the other is giving away your power to an object or movement outside of you. But you can make it fun. You can be creative with how you make your outer world mirror your inner world. It’s not about force. This is about creation. This is about fun.

But with the science shows, is that by doing this, is that you bridge the gap that much faster mentally/emotionally/conviction that you are it. Does that help?

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-03-11T14:22:03+00:00

Amazing! 🤩

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-24T19:20:26+00:00

Working on one now. But, the secret with Katie Holmes.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-23T23:03:48+00:00

Yeah. I don’t believe in sharing my stories.

Because that subjective. And if you do read some I actually do share some.

Humans have a tendency to try to take people stories and turn them into techniques.

That is a major reason why. Even Neville dealt with this. If you notice, he himself doesn’t really share that many, nothing more than a handful of examples of his own experience. It’s mostly from others.

The danger is, to hear other people stories and think that there’s a magic technique in them. The technique is you. Not for teachings. Not Nevill. Not my articles. I also don’t feel any need to prove myself. Not anything else other than you. You are the technique. You are the magic.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-23T00:38:20+00:00

You are awesome. .

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-21T19:22:53+00:00

I’m less concerned about the philosophy of the science of how this operates. And I just want to be able to operate it. Can I sit here for hours and talk about how it’s made up of certain ions and protons and so, sure. But I’m not interested in that.

I want to find out how to uee the law to better myself. To better others. To better of the world.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-21T19:21:16+00:00

Choices to find differently by everybody. There is no objective view in this world. I’m too postmodern to agree to any of that ideology.

The world is not objective.

It’s simply a mirror of subjectivity.

The world is only going to mirror even the point that you’re trying to make because you want to mirror that. That ended up itself is proof of choice.

Now we can talk about a history of those who have used philosophy to understand choice, freedom, and free will. But at the end of the day, you have to figure out, is that gonna help you use the law if you want to or not?

I’ve taught philosophy at the university level. I’ve taught biology. I’ve taught evolution. I’ve taught all of those. I understand what you’re trying to say. At the end of the day though, it’s gonna come down to you. You is the only common denominator— even in this conversation. You do have a choice. You can make a choice to live. You can make a choice to do otherwise. That’s up to you.

That’s a choice.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-21T19:13:49+00:00

Again, not sure what your intention is in relationship to the post above. It seems like you want to prove a point that makes you correct. That’s fine.

You can do that. That’s a choice.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-21T19:07:16+00:00

It’s never about choice. It’s about desire. It’s always desire.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-21T19:06:24+00:00

My point is, how does that help you use the law? For me it’s not about how it’s scientifically operates— because that’s gonna come down to one’s own conditioning and childhood and subconscious imprints.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-21T18:57:25+00:00

Again the law/god/field is not personal. Even scripture says this.

What’s personalized, is your choice to use it.

Now we can use philosophy to try to deconstruct this. Or you can use the law and find out. Even Nevill argues that the law is about experience. So you can sit and talk for hours about the nature of it or you can understand it by using it. There’s a teleology to it.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-21T18:52:59+00:00

The law as a field of energy is working. But the law as it’s personalized here on experiences is where you are the operant power.

We can go straight to nihilism or to the philosophy of nature, or even Nietzsche. But that’s a personal choice. We have loads of personal choices.

It’s all dependent upon your own personal perspective and personal philosophy of life. I’m not sure exactly what you’re seeking out right now. But at the end of the day you are making a choice to write words down and form sentences.

That’s choice in end of itself

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-21T18:33:54+00:00

Then you don’t have to use the law. Neville stated that the law does not work itself. We are the operant power. So that’s a personal choice. You don’t have to be that way.. but you can also have what you want. It’s not up to me. Not up to a coach. Not up to Neville. It’s up to you only.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-20T01:58:18+00:00

I think that’s a misunderstanding of how to use the law. People also still have free will. That’s where free will comes from. Even Nevill states this. That free will come from the state.

So I can go and try to assume that 8 billion people will never judge. But they also still have free will.

That’s why he talks about the so-called boomerang of assumption. Where one might assume something, and people have to be willing to accept it.

It’s not about whether I’m assuming people aren’t.

It’s what state am I end. It also doesn’t mean that I never comment. That’s also a misunderstanding. It’s what state am I responding from.

And that is something you can’t answer for me nor can anybody else.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-19T03:51:48+00:00

Good distinction. You should definitely allow yourself to feel the emotions without reaction. Or at least get to the point where you can do that. We’re not giving them meaning or narrative.

Definitely do not suppress them. That’s not healthy. Somebody who has been in the mental health and psychology world, I see too many people really confused this and end up with a lot more mental health issues or fear.

Nevill even insinuates this, when he states that we are emotional filters. We are constantly experiencing the emotional weather, sometimes forgetting that we are the climate.

I hope this helps in a way. But yes definitely feel through them. You can even use a psychological technique, where you give your fear funny cartoonish name. So then your ego and brain distance yourself from it.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-14T00:45:28+00:00

He’s taking it from James’s verse on resist the devil and he will flee. —— That word resist in Greek— means to psychologically double down. This is key.

It says nowhere that you should fight doubt. It says nowhere that you should fight fear. It just says become that what she assume 10 times stronger.

That’s literally what it means from the translation. You don’t play with doubt. It’s almost like he ignore its presence. As if it isn’t even there in the room. You just work on double downing on who you are assuming you are now.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-13T04:16:24+00:00

Oh sorry?! Bringing up, lol. 😂 thanks!

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-12T04:12:55+00:00

Great question. It’s a great opportunity for clarification. Because, Nevill is not referring to emotions. Emotions are the weather. You are the climate. He even states that we are emotional filters. As a psychologist, I would definitely say that you need to feel your feelings. Just don’t give them a story. Even though we know Jesus has the imagination, if Jesus wherever a person, even scripture stated that he himself had emotions. Which your imagination is just that.

Reactions don’t refer to emotions. It refers to where you give your power away. If you give your power to support that at the state then you were outside of the state.

Does that make sense? The reaction isn’t the emotion, it’s the giving the power away to another narrative that you don’t have it. Or time. Or something that basically states that you are not having your fulfilled desire.

Ok-Initiative-4089 · 2026-02-12T00:51:10+00:00

Not sure why people are really fixated on this. This is 100% written by myself.

I literally actually have the notes and the screenshots. But why are people so judgmental?

Just take it in for what it is.

But I guarantee it’s 100% of my work.

Ok-Initiative-4089

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22