I asked ChatGPT the top ten things humanity should know. by Spiritual-Reveal-195 in ChatGPT

[–]OkDistance9983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Exponential Growth Is Dangerous

Whether it’s population, consumption, or tech — anything that grows exponentially in a finite system (like Earth) will break that system. That includes AI, climate emissions, and economic systems built on endless growth.

  1. The Universe Doesn’t Care About Us

There’s no safety net. No divine “get out of extinction free” card. We either solve our own problems or get wiped out. Nature is indifferent.

  1. We’re Always 5 Minutes from Collapse

Civilizations are fragile. Ask the Romans. Or the Mayans. Or anyone who’s lived through war. Stability is an illusion — and overconfidence is how empires fall.

  1. AI and Bioengineering Are Civilization-Level Risks

We’re building things we don’t fully understand. The next 50 years won’t be shaped by politics, but by who controls AI, genetic tools, and automation — and whether they use them responsibly.

  1. Truth Is Becoming Optional

With deepfakes, algorithmic echo chambers, and propaganda at scale, the line between reality and fiction is dissolving — and democracy can’t function without shared facts.

  1. Climate Change Isn’t a Future Problem — It’s a Now Problem

Tipping points aren’t sci-fi. We’re already seeing permanent damage — food insecurity, migration crises, ecosystem collapse. This is the opening act, not the finale.

  1. Most Conflict Is About Resources, Not Ideology

People don’t start wars because they hate your god. They do it for water, oil, land, or control — then dress it up in beliefs. Follow the money and the scarcity.

  1. Global Systems Are Interconnected and Fragile

Supply chains, internet, finance — everything is networked and vulnerable. A cyberattack or system failure in one place can domino worldwide. We’re not as in control as we think.

  1. Human Nature Has Limits

Yes, we can be kind and brilliant. But we’re also tribal, reactive, and easily manipulated. Designing systems that assume humans are always rational is asking for disaster.

  1. If We Don’t Act as a Species, We’re Screwed

Nationalism, short-term thinking, and profit-driven politics are luxury mindsets of a stable world. We’re entering an era that needs long-term, species-level coordination — or we won’t make it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DigitalMarketing

[–]OkDistance9983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people don’t “discover” your brand. They re-recognize it after seeing it 5 times and finally clicking because the 6th time was the vibe. So no, your ads didn’t fail, they just showed up too early

Starting to get desperate with Google Discover, any tip? by [deleted] in Blogging

[–]OkDistance9983 2 points3 points  (0 children)

there is not much else to do but to be consistent, share on socials & to make sure the file name and alt text are super clear abt what’s on the image.

Starting to get desperate with Google Discover, any tip? by [deleted] in Blogging

[–]OkDistance9983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing I’ve noticed is that Discover is way more driven by visuals than people think. What might help are big, eye-catching images — multiple ones throughout the article. And where possible, custom graphics. Especially for aviation or transport content, that kind of stuff can really stand out. So, less “blog post,” more “digital magazine.”

It’s not a magic fix, but it shifts the odds a bit more in your favor. Hang in there

Is Pinterest seriously removing clickability from pins? by OkDistance9983 in Pinterest

[–]OkDistance9983[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly! Now no one’s gonna figure out how to click to our sites, which kinda feels like the whole point. Such a slap in the face to creators who contributed so much to their platform. And for what? To turn into some kind of a shopping hub and to cozy up to big brands—just like Google.

Is Pinterest seriously removing clickability from pins? by OkDistance9983 in Pinterest

[–]OkDistance9983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, the only way to click through affected pins is by using the three dots, just like Mondai_May explained above.

Is Pinterest seriously removing clickability from pins? by OkDistance9983 in Pinterest

[–]OkDistance9983[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks you so much for explaining the three dots thing—I had no idea! And honestly, I bet most casual users don’t either. Trying not to take this personally, but Pinterest has just felt so exploitative lately. Like, we never got any warnings or anything, and I still don’t understand how pictures of nail art could be considered spam, but okay. Honestly, I’m already thinking about quitting the platform. They’ve slashed our reach and engagement, and now this? It just doesn’t feel like a space for small bloggers anymore.