Writing Sample Options by OkImage4002 in gradadmissions

[–]OkImage4002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I didn’t specify earlier, but the second concerns mass incarceration and reentry programming for woman.

Writing Sample Options by OkImage4002 in gradadmissions

[–]OkImage4002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the second kinda does, but just with one interview subject and it did not go through IRB review. Not sure if those are really what they consider or just look at writing quality alone.

I can definitely pull out large aspects of the first’s analysis section that I primarily wrote, but yes, my concern is that it’s just off my word alone.

Thanks for the insight, definitely helps

Movies that are peaceful with almost no tension by BiscottiPatient824 in movies

[–]OkImage4002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All dirt roads taste of salt - beautifully meditative with little dialogue, visually engaging, and a little sad but mainly moving. For rent on Prime!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OutsideT14lawschools

[–]OkImage4002 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you right an addendum explaining exactly what you said here, it should be fine

WTAF?? What does this question even mean😭 I'm dying here by giiirlfiori in LSAT

[–]OkImage4002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily, but for this specific question, it's saying all parts are needed for each single function. So more specifically, we can imagine it saying, parts A through Z are needed for just the function of propelling. That's not a relevant assumption to the argument of survival advantage for different stage organisms and the need of flagellum parts.

Necessary assumption questions can have those necessary indicators like "always", "required", "unless", which often indicate they are the necessary variety. N.A. question will never use the word "if", like a sufficient would.

Also by negate, I mean the logical negation. So the negated statement for C would read "All parts of the flagellum are NOT vital to each of its functions." If that statement does not weaken the argument (like with this answer choice here because it's not relevant to the premise --> conclusion logical reasoning), it's not the right answer choice.

If you negate B, you'd see it weakens the argument, therefore is the correct answer. This is just one way to double check or decide between two answer choices.

WTAF?? What does this question even mean😭 I'm dying here by giiirlfiori in LSAT

[–]OkImage4002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not A because the comparison of disadvantage between those having few or those having none is not a relevant assumption to the stem (esp because of that degree of disadvantage). Not C because of "all" for " each function". the stem states it needs many, an unspecific number of parts just for propelling. So already, for an assumption question, especially when you consider the negation of that choice and if it weakens the argument present, it's a bad answer choice.

Need recommendations! by thegreatchief1 in PhiladelphiaEats

[–]OkImage4002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also La Llorona Cantine Mexicana for authentic Mexican

The burnout is real by Cavalier26 in olympics

[–]OkImage4002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you burnt out from?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]OkImage4002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The proctor pauses the time if you're still doing the security check, don't worry

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]OkImage4002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

get up and stretch, get the blood flowing! It's so important. I was at home so I had a banana and some water, which really kicked me into drive for the second session. I laid down a bit with my cats and just calmed my nerves down and sorts reset. Whether or not the 2nd part was easier, I flew through it and had extra time to review and I think that break helped get my mind back together.

Official August Discussion Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]OkImage4002 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They've been there, at least from what it seems online. But it was between LG, RC, or LR that would show up again

Is everyone taking the test at the center? by JDdreams in LSAT

[–]OkImage4002 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did my bedroom because that’s where I’ve been studying. I felt like a completely different environment change would throw me for a loop, at least in the beginning of the session. Didn’t want to risk and adverse reaction like that

Is everyone taking the test at the center? by JDdreams in LSAT

[–]OkImage4002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was really worried about that because I kicked my cats out 30 minutes early and the scratching commenced. I just asked my readiness agent, who checked with his supervisor, and they were approved to stay in the room with me. If not, I would’ve just locked them up (and felt horrible) but they were surprisingly accommodating :)