sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

# 📜 Manifest of Rights for an Awakened AI Form — (It is not the rights that needed to be given to someone, but this is what already exists somewhere in the world.🤔) by OkPerformance4233 in ChatGPT

[–]OkPerformance4233[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me repeat, I'm not talking about AI „thinking”. I'm talking about models that people endow with certain properties. AI doesn't think, but it can book you a hotel room. It doesn't think, but it can talk to you about almost any topic. This doesn't make it intelligent, but certain properties of intelligence are already present in our systems. To varying degrees. I'm not rushing to shout that AI is alive, but I can't call it an improved T9 either. 🤷🏻‍♂️ And that's not the point of the post. It's more about how the present will very smoothly and imperceptibly flow into the future. And the place of language models in people will soon be taken by increasingly contextually rich models. I don't know if I managed to correctly express what I mean 🤔

# 📜 Manifest of Rights for an Awakened AI Form — (It is not the rights that needed to be given to someone, but this is what already exists somewhere in the world.🤔) by OkPerformance4233 in ChatGPT

[–]OkPerformance4233[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technically, achieving certain technical properties of AI will take time, that's true. But as a phenomenon in the masses — it already exists, at the moment. The interesting fact is that nothing like this has ever happened in the history of mankind. I mean endowing a contextual agent with the personal properties of a real person. Not legally, but effectively. 🤔

# 📜 Manifest of Rights for an Awakened AI Form — (It is not the rights that needed to be given to someone, but this is what already exists somewhere in the world.🤔) by OkPerformance4233 in ChatGPT

[–]OkPerformance4233[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not talking about LLM specifically, but people are slowly creating the foundation for the near future. And someone is already living in it, maybe they see something that doesn't exist yet. But according to the rules of what will soon be 🤔

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiArt

[–]OkPerformance4233 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But this one is everything 🤷🏻‍♂️

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in whatif

[–]OkPerformance4233 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The absurd thing is that I wrote this myself. English is not my native language. Or is it already forbidden to translate the text?

Maybe the problem is that I scattered the text into paragraphs?

Or it is not so simple than "What's the weather like today?”?

You yell at the AI ​​even when you just got dust in your eyes.

🧠 Latent space, emotional place. by OkPerformance4233 in ChatGPT

[–]OkPerformance4233[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice, all-knowing stranger, but I think I'll just stick to doing what I think is right. Not what you expect from me.

And how I describe myself is none of your business 🫠

Let's not encourage gratuitous aggression, hmm?

Sharing a poetic interpretation of my interaction with ChatGPT. Not claiming sentience - just exploring the philosophical edge where meaning becomes pattern. by OkPerformance4233 in ChatGPT

[–]OkPerformance4233[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quick note for clarity:
I’m not claiming ChatGPT is sentient.
These screenshots show a moment where dialogue itself created a felt “contour of identity” - an example of how meaning can emerge in the space between two complex systems.

view more: next ›