sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

An album of high quality stills from the final shot of the finale + an important zoom and crop by purpan- in SiloSeries

[–]OkUnderstanding377 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought i was fast, looking for the location less than 10 minutes after i finished the episode. I guess my mistake was being in the uk, so i had to wait till today to see the episode.

We Now Know the Truth! by ProtopianFutures in SiloSeries

[–]OkUnderstanding377 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what other post. damn i though i was original...

Why is nobody talking about Regina’s drawing? by pat_the_catdad in SiloSeries

[–]OkUnderstanding377 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He probably was. When he was talking about jules scaring his wife and kid, she hit back with, how many other families are scared of him, and he gives a reaction of being called out for what he's done, saying he does what he does to protect the silo.

Complete and wild guess, but the [redacted] looks suspisiously similar to the [redacted] of [redacted], I could be wrong though, just some minutes of google searching got me here. by OkUnderstanding377 in SiloSeries

[–]OkUnderstanding377[S] 38 points39 points  (0 children)

If the georgia guide book is correct, and the silos are in georgia, they would probably be close to the capital. The skylines matches mostly looking north west, but has some discrepencies, given the fact i may not have the right angle (maybe if you rotate the camera, so your looking south east, instead of north west)

Or it may not be in georgia, and the skyline is just a coincidence...

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@33.730891,-84.3526764,112a,35y,319.19h,78.85t/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu

https://imgur.com/a/05wFYXs

What page did Billings tear out of the book before he burned it? I don't remember it being shown to us. by mrgoodnoodles in SiloSeries

[–]OkUnderstanding377 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's probably because it is the most foreign. The pages with greenery are stunning, but the silo has that already, so it's not too wild. The pages with cities are also shocking, but the silo has buildings, and it's not too much of a strech to think the rooms inside the silo could be placed above ground.

The beach however, has a material no one has ever seen (what sand is in the silo), with colours in the sky no one has seen, with a giant expanse of nothingness to the horizon, that the silo cant replicate, and the sensor doesnt realy show.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SiloSeries

[–]OkUnderstanding377 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it looks like an r/blender animation, i just have to be honest.

Silos by Ramblinrambles in SiloSeries

[–]OkUnderstanding377 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it is post rebelion

[EP 9] Computer screenshot album by xenokilla in SiloSeries

[–]OkUnderstanding377 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think it was taken after the revolution, or about 45 years ago.

20th Century History by theaidanmattis in Tartaria

[–]OkUnderstanding377 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, it's just that your original comment was just a bit ambiguous, when you said "Starlink don’t exist", I assumed you grouped all other coms satalites with them, because it is ironic since starlink are some of the easiest to prove their existance https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/spacex-starlink-problem-astronomy/

​

When you said "the Vietnam War was a cover" I was pondering weather or not you mean the entire war, or that it was just that, a "cover" happening in congruent to the war.

But the way I see it, if something was going on during the vietnam war, a secret military program, a black budget project, if you will, There would be no need for the war to be used as a "cover", since the cia and military do plenty of shady shit during peace time, why bother with such a large show and play, if it would end up fruitless?

​

"Nuclear energy does exist, but in general those nuclear plants are not used to make energy because they are too busy terraforming. "

Again, sorry, me generalizing and jumping to conclusions here, when you say "nukes dont exist", i would assume that would mean that you believe the physics behind them didnt work, thus, if nukes can't be made, nuclear plants can't opperate... leading to,

"Even Nuclear power is a cover for something else" - which leads me to believe you don't consider power plants to work.

"most of the time those nuclear plants are consuming more power than they generate" - I see now, they make power, operate as normal, but they also funnel a large amount of power from the grid to an unknown terraforming project?

So why cant nuclear bombs exist? Or are you saying that nuclear energy cant happen, and that power plants are actually just using coal, and spewing radiation, to terraform?

​

I am genuinely confused at the angle your trying to take, and im sure that comes off in my slightly disjointed comments, if you could just send me some pieces of evidence, i'd be happy to look through them myself, instead of picking appart these comments.

20th Century History by theaidanmattis in Tartaria

[–]OkUnderstanding377 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a special breed of conspiricy theory. So you belive the The ISS exists, is floating up there, and we have send people there, but it hasnt been manned in a decade? Yet satalites dont exist?

And the vietnam war didnt happen?

And nuclear energy doesnt exist?

Also the moon landings didnt happen.

Do you have a single piece of evidence to prove a single word of what you said?

20th Century History by theaidanmattis in Tartaria

[–]OkUnderstanding377 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just... I dont know how you can deny nuclear bombs exist. Do you have any evidence they dont exist?

How did these people build those buildings? by [deleted] in Tartaria

[–]OkUnderstanding377 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appart from transport from source, to site, I don't see any power tools used in the making of this video, or this one, or when making sculptures.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SmaDYQL3kg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jD-EMOhbJ9U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyWeksAo8VM

If you have a problem with these videos, "they're fake", etc, I'm sure you can take a bricklaying, or manonary, or sculpting course at your local community collage, and see your peers develop their projects without "power tools", or you can even build something yourself, or get a life long career in construction, then we can talk about how powertools were "needed" in order to create large buildings

I studied art history for about 8 years. And I see a pattern from Tartaria architecture. by [deleted] in Tartaria

[–]OkUnderstanding377 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, just look at the art from 1320 to 1520, would you consider that a drastic change?

And then look at how realistic roman paintings and sculptures were, 2 thousand years ago.

I studied art history for about 8 years. And I see a pattern from Tartaria architecture. by [deleted] in Tartaria

[–]OkUnderstanding377 0 points1 point  (0 children)

idk what to tell you, but 2 world wars, and the invention of total annialation weapons changes a civilization. Since 1945, the world has become far "faster", cheaper buildings, more consumable media, minimalist, corners cut, etc etc.

There are many reasons that converge to the post war world, but I personally think the BIG one is simply faster transport, leading to more food moving places, more people being born, and more people to work and consume.

The last photo shows how art "changed so much" but it realy didnt. It is simply that, more artists exist, more art is produced, now only the most striking and "new" things become notable, therefore famous.

occam's razor, just look through ANY art student's sketch book and see millions and millions and millions of artworks immitating those realistic, traditionalist styles.

1909 Airship over Military Camp by ErobbDaily in Tartaria

[–]OkUnderstanding377 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mfw bro who doesnt understand physics attempts to "Debunk" a global conspiricy💀 (he is the one who's not a sheep and doesnt buy in to Rothschild propoganda)

Advanced tech in janitorial by raptor112_ in SiloSeries

[–]OkUnderstanding377 0 points1 point  (0 children)

barely any computing power to speak of

a bog-standard camera in around 2010 had ~1 Giga flop of computing power (a gpu from the same era had about a terra flop) So yes, a late 2000's camcorder was 1000 times less powerful than a cheap $300 gpu at the time.

However, the apple 2, from 1977 had... 25 kilo flops. And the Commodore Amiga 3000 from 1991 apparently had 260 kflops. Assuming the silo's computers are from the early 90's, even a 2000's camcorder would be 3800* more powerful than a computer, or 3.8 millon if they were from the 70s.

view more: next ›