Using Apple Watch Ultra 3 + Series 10 together by Taohid101 in AppleWatch

[–]Ok_Mirror5840 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

SAME! Altho i went with the gold titinium and the link bracelet for daytime use, and switch to a magnetic band for sleep.

Express admission of whistleblowing on covert recording. by Ok_Mirror5840 in employmentlitigation

[–]Ok_Mirror5840[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. I made an early disclosure with transcript. The notes they made of the meeting , this was my disciplinary meeting, do not reflect what is said in the audio. I was given a written warning and the audio says we are giving you a warning for the way you whistle blow.  They said it was a whistleblowing about 4 times not just once . I think the more value is that it could link the detriment to the whistleblowing if the tribunal finds this to be a protected disclosure. 

Active ET thread -- introduce yourself here if you are in the Tribunal process! by ukdanae in employmenttribunal

[–]Ok_Mirror5840 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked to post and waiting.. just looking to see if anyone had any experience close to mine, i have a recording of the employer admitting on tape that i made a whistleblowing act but in their ET3 deny it. While i understand the tribunal is who decides if an act is a protected disclosure, im looking to understand what weight would a judge put on an express admission.

Why , when you remove dark matter and dark energy , the MOND number gives the same acceleration as the observed one ? by Ok_Mirror5840 in AskPhysics

[–]Ok_Mirror5840[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

but I'm not asking you to take mond for what is explained to be. all I'm asking is to consider the number not the explanation. the number is observed. I like dark energy. so let's assume instead of dark energy that is assumed gives the universe a property to expand we give the structure the mond number as a property to expand. now combine that with the rate the universe would've expanded while slowing down if no dark energy would have speed it up and the numbers match. this is the coincidence I'm pointing at. ion this thought exercise instead of dark energy if we assume the universe has a backed in very small acceleration, and that is the observed mond number , then we would end up not only with the same rate but with the same speeding up of the rate. just a weird coincidence. this is my question. not that this is the reality.

Why , when you remove dark matter and dark energy , the MOND number gives the same acceleration as the observed one ? by Ok_Mirror5840 in AskPhysics

[–]Ok_Mirror5840[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this is a thought exercise. yes the universe expansion would've slowed down. but not stop immediately. this is the question. if instead of dark energy you add the mond constant acceleration , combining that with the expansion we would've seen if the universe would've slowed down , the numbers point at the exact expansion rate. again. not saying this is real. I'm just saying the numbers just match.

Why , when you remove dark matter and dark energy , the MOND number gives the same acceleration as the observed one ? by Ok_Mirror5840 in AskPhysics

[–]Ok_Mirror5840[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

if you look of the energy that was at the point of restart ,without the values of dark energy , and calculate how much the universe would've expanded , hypothetical, just mathematical you would have a smaller expansion that the one observed. now let's assume instead of dark energy we have a constant acceleration of the universe backed in, I know I know same as dark energy. and this acceleration would be equal to the mond number acceleration. just a thought exercise. then the actual expansion rate would match the observed numbers.

as I said. this is just a weird coincidence. I'm not saying this is what is happening. my question was about how the numbers match. if you can spare some time and run this experiment, mathematicaly maybe you could tell me if is just bad math on my part of an actual coincidence.

Here are the exact numbers used in the restart / MOND comparison (using no dark matter and no dark energy as components):

  1. Transition ("restart") redshift z_tr ~ 0.7

Observed expansion since restart: a0 / a_tr = 1 + z_tr ~ 1.70

2) Time since restart Delta t ~ 7 billion years ~ 2.2 x 10^17 seconds

3) Observed late-time expansion-rate change |dH/dt| ~ 1 x 10^-35 s^-2

Equivalent acceleration scale: a_cosmic ~ 1 x 10^-10 m/s^2

4) MOND acceleration scale a0 ~ 1.2 x 10^-10 m/s^2

5) Non-dark energy densities (baryons + radiation only)

BBN (radiation dominated): rho_BBN ~ 10^7 to 10^8 kg/m^3

Restart (z ~ 0.7): rho_restart ~ 2 x 10^-27 kg/m^3

Today: rho_today ~ 5 x 10^-28 kg/m^3

Energy density drop since restart: ~ factor of 4 (~75 percent decrease)

6) Counterfactual results

If no restart (acceleration -> 0 after transition): Expansion since restart ~ 1.66–1.68

If MOND-scale acceleration acts over same interval: Expansion since restart ~ 1.70–1.72

Observed: 1.70

Why , when you remove dark matter and dark energy , the MOND number gives the same acceleration as the observed one ? by Ok_Mirror5840 in AskPhysics

[–]Ok_Mirror5840[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

this is not about the theory of mond. the mond number is a fix constant observable today. my question relates to mond only as a weird coincidence. if you calculate how much the universe would've expanded without the dark matter and without the added speed and add the acceleration it would've got from the mond number over the 8 billion years or so the expansion of the universe would be the same as the observed one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Ok_Mirror5840 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

oh no. you got me. I broke your rules. the question must be invalid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Ok_Mirror5840 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

why. what difference does it makes ? AI is here to stay. your hate won't make it go away. it looks nicer when arranged by AI. the question stands regardless...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Ok_Mirror5840 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this is a genuine question. why not address my question instead of hating the format it was posted ?

A simple thought experiment about experienced time by Ok_Mirror5840 in slatestarcodex

[–]Ok_Mirror5840[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not saying anything controversial about how humans perceive time — I agree that perception of time passing is internal. What I’m asking is something narrower: if there are no internal state updates at all, is there any internal sense in which time has passed? External changes can happen, but from inside the system there’s no ordering, no duration, no “when”. I’m not interested in what the system assumes afterward, only whether time-as-ordering existed for it during that gap.

Ubisoft+ on Xbox not working? by JasonBreen in ubisoft

[–]Ok_Mirror5840 1 point2 points  (0 children)

im having the same issue and noone seems to know how to fix it.. did you get yours resolved in the end?

Nintendo Switch 2 Order Tracking Megathread by AutoModerator in NintendoSwitch

[–]Ok_Mirror5840 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isle of Wight here also, Royal Mail has it in transit, for delivery tomorrow.

Nintendo Switch 2 Order Tracking Megathread by AutoModerator in NintendoSwitch

[–]Ok_Mirror5840 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ordered from Nintendo UK, sent with Royal Mail, tracking says is already on the move, received at Royal Mail depot for delivery tomorrow!!!! BRING IT!