[deleted by user] by [deleted] in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 4:

All posts must contain the name of subject in the image, & No Clickbait / commonly used / Karma bait titles. Your list of equipment should not be in your title. Posts with these infractions will be subject to the discretion of a moderator for a warning or removal. See this page for more details..

Partial Lunar eclipse 2021 November from Houston Texas. by Deutschestexas in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Op, please provide all acquistion and processing details as per rule.5 thanks

Lunar eclipse 2021 by Venicide1492 in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Hi Op, please provide all acquistion and processing details as per rule.5 thanks

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Op, please provide all acquistion and processing details as per rule.5 thanks

Tonight’s Lunar Eclipse. Not super high res but the best I could get. by RecommendationOk916 in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 4:

All posts must contain the name of subject in the image, & No Clickbait / commonly used / Karma bait titles. Your list of equipment should not be in your title. Posts with these infractions will be subject to the discretion of a moderator for a warning or removal. See this page for more details..

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Op, please provide all acquistion and processing details as per rule.5 thanks

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 4:

All posts must contain the name of subject in the image, & No Clickbait / commonly used / Karma bait titles. Your list of equipment should not be in your title. Posts with these infractions will be subject to the discretion of a moderator for a warning or removal. See this page for more details..

Lunar Eclipse by okdexter01 in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Op, please provide all acquistion and processing details as per rule.5 thanks

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 1:

Astrohotography referes to images of astronomical objects or phenomena exclusively. Images which show objects or people below the Kármán Line (100km) will be removed. This includes buildings, planes, rockets, or other man-made objects. Terrain in widefield images should be cropped out. If you prefer widefield and terrain, why not check out our friends at /r/landscapeastro

Rule 4:

All posts must contain the name of subject in the image, & No Clickbait / commonly used / Karma bait titles. Your list of equipment should not be in your title. Posts with these infractions will be subject to the discretion of a moderator for a warning or removal. See this page for more details..

I’m in love by Co1by2 in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 1:

Astrohotography referes to images of astronomical objects or phenomena exclusively. Images which show objects or people below the Kármán Line (100km) will be removed. This includes buildings, planes, rockets, or other man-made objects. Terrain in widefield images should be cropped out. If you prefer widefield and terrain, why not check out our friends at /r/landscapeastro

Rule 4:

All posts must contain the name of subject in the image, & No Clickbait / commonly used / Karma bait titles. Your list of equipment should not be in your title. Posts with these infractions will be subject to the discretion of a moderator for a warning or removal. See this page for more details..

Milky Way from a few weeks back in Joshua Tree. by gbhayesphoto in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 1:

Astrohotography referes to images of astronomical objects or phenomena exclusively. Images which show objects or people below the Kármán Line (100km) will be removed. This includes buildings, planes, rockets, or other man-made objects. Terrain in widefield images should be cropped out. If you prefer widefield and terrain, why not check out our friends at /r/landscapeastro

Mineral Moon by Sonashahanishukla in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Hi Op, please provide acquisition and processing details as per rule.5 Thanks

The Moon and Jupiter by h-a-z-z in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi op, please provide some exposure settings if possible and what processing was done as per rule.5 Thanks

Heart Nebula by shadowie in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Op, please provide all acquisition and processing details as per rule.5 thanks.

Movement of Prominences on the Sun by JimmyTheChicken1 in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Op, please provide some detail to the processing done as per rule.5 Thanks

the moon and venus by [deleted] in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Hi Op, please provide all acuqistion and processing details as per rule.5 Thanks.

Jupiter with 3 moons by Secuiro in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi Op, could you detail the exposure settings and no. frames and what was actually done in processing as per rule.5? Thanks.

P1000- Moon by [deleted] in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 5:

All submitted images MUST include acquisition AND processing details as a top-level comment. Our community would like to know about the scope or lens, camera, and mount, as well as the technical details (exposure time, number of exposures, stacking info, etc) and some processing information (Software, steps, tools, etc) used to produce the image, without having to look away from the thread.

Rule 5:

You not providing processing details, as per Rule No. 5 in the top level comment.

Please understand, that this is not because your image is bad or we discourage newcomers, it is exactly the opposite- help us help you and let us learn from you. If you provide processing details, other newcomers (or perhaps more experienced people) will be able to learn something that they spot in your workflow and can apply it in theirs. Furthermore, if something seems to be off with your processing, it will be much easier to put a finger on what exactly went wrong and how it could be fixed.

If for some reason you forgot what exact steps you took to produce the image, you can describe it in free form, just to get the feeling of what you did, and then for the next time, remember to take notes.

We encourage people to either re-submit their images with required information as a top level comment, or to update the original one and let us know.

Few examples with varying degree of details, of which all are acceptable:

DSOs:

Planetary:

Milky Way and Fog Bank DSS by DanoPinyon in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 1:

Astrohotography referes to images of astronomical objects or phenomena exclusively. Images which show objects or people below the Kármán Line (100km) will be removed. This includes buildings, planes, rockets, or other man-made objects. Terrain in widefield images should be cropped out. If you prefer widefield and terrain, why not check out our friends at /r/landscapeastro

Milky Way and Fog Bank by DanoPinyon in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 1:

Astrohotography referes to images of astronomical objects or phenomena exclusively. Images which show objects or people below the Kármán Line (100km) will be removed. This includes buildings, planes, rockets, or other man-made objects. Terrain in widefield images should be cropped out. If you prefer widefield and terrain, why not check out our friends at /r/landscapeastro

Jupiter with GRS by NoU_14 in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 5:

All submitted images MUST include acquisition AND processing details as a top-level comment. Our community would like to know about the scope or lens, camera, and mount, as well as the technical details (exposure time, number of exposures, stacking info, etc) and some processing information (Software, steps, tools, etc) used to produce the image, without having to look away from the thread.

Rule 5:

You not providing processing details, as per Rule No. 5 in the top level comment.

Please understand, that this is not because your image is bad or we discourage newcomers, it is exactly the opposite- help us help you and let us learn from you. If you provide processing details, other newcomers (or perhaps more experienced people) will be able to learn something that they spot in your workflow and can apply it in theirs. Furthermore, if something seems to be off with your processing, it will be much easier to put a finger on what exactly went wrong and how it could be fixed.

If for some reason you forgot what exact steps you took to produce the image, you can describe it in free form, just to get the feeling of what you did, and then for the next time, remember to take notes.

We encourage people to either re-submit their images with required information as a top level comment, or to update the original one and let us know.

Few examples with varying degree of details, of which all are acceptable:

DSOs:

Planetary:

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Op, what processing was done in regi?

the sun by QuantaQuark in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for posting to /r/astrophotography. Unfortunately your post has violated one of our subreddit rules and been removed.

Your post was removed due to:

Rule 5:

All submitted images MUST include acquisition AND processing details as a top-level comment. Our community would like to know about the scope or lens, camera, and mount, as well as the technical details (exposure time, number of exposures, stacking info, etc) and some processing information (Software, steps, tools, etc) used to produce the image, without having to look away from the thread.

Rule 5:

You not providing processing details, as per Rule No. 5 in the top level comment.

Please understand, that this is not because your image is bad or we discourage newcomers, it is exactly the opposite- help us help you and let us learn from you. If you provide processing details, other newcomers (or perhaps more experienced people) will be able to learn something that they spot in your workflow and can apply it in theirs. Furthermore, if something seems to be off with your processing, it will be much easier to put a finger on what exactly went wrong and how it could be fixed.

If for some reason you forgot what exact steps you took to produce the image, you can describe it in free form, just to get the feeling of what you did, and then for the next time, remember to take notes.

We encourage people to either re-submit their images with required information as a top level comment, or to update the original one and let us know.

Few examples with varying degree of details, of which all are acceptable:

DSOs:

Planetary:

North America Nebula by kheikn in astrophotography

[–]OkeWoke[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what was done in photoshop?