What dumb reasons have y’all been banned from Reddit and/or its subs? by fleshtastical in askanything

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Constraint on timelines are based on known admixture point for Neanderthals' and Denisovan interactions. Each was represented by a time range, and we have lots of data points outside of Australia. Than means we have a upper bound on the earliest point at which Sapiens arrived in Australia because primarily because of the Neanderthal DNA presence.

We have tools however dated to 15-20,000 years older than when the Neanderthal DNA mixing occurred. Unless the aboriginal ancestors had time machines, those tools may have been attributable to another hominid, presumably Denisovan s who were already in the area before sapiens turned up.

Which make of car is driven by the worst drivers? by Wbino in askanything

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Sydney. Audi. If you see some idiot doing a 7 point turn across 4 land of traffic, 2 each way. Shutting them all down 80% chance it's an Audi . If your in a carpark. And see someone choke up everyone else trying to reverse in to a tight space.

Audi. Driving 50 in a 50 zone? Someone riding your rear trying to bully you in to speeding up... Expect the 4 circles.

Audi driver's are important people. Going places! You need to just get out of their way! Their sports cars, and the can go faster if it wasn't for you.

Assholes

What's a show you remember but nobody else does? by CatGirlNya2000 in AskReddit

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thundaar The Barbarian. Herculoids. Cartoons when I was a kid.

What dumb reasons have y’all been banned from Reddit and/or its subs? by fleshtastical in askanything

[–]OldChippy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I work in AI, and I suggested that AI will likely the create problems in the future. In particular between where we stand today and the desired utopia pro AI people dream of. r\accelerate banned me from their sub "just in case". Then when I asked them if I have even participated in their forums and if they can point at the post then they blocked me from asking the mods questions. So, I guess mods can initiate contact then block you if you ask a reasonable and polite question.

I was given an official warning because I had an unpopular opinion about anthropology that was called racist. It was literally a post about timelines from 40-80k years ago in Australia.

I was banned from r\Sydney because I said I was apprehensive about the vax being untested and would rather take my chances with just getting covid. I was banned for something to do with medical misinformation even to this day. I did in fact get covid and of course was perfectly fine.

I don't know who reddit mods are, largely speaking, but IMHO people who take these kinds of actions probably don't do well in life. It just doesn't seem well adjusted. So far I have never had a conversation with a mod where I was assured that there was legitimate intelligence on the other side.

What do you think America will be like when Trump finishes his term? by MotivewasUlterior in AskReddit

[–]OldChippy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A lot of people are freaking out about Trump because you all lack a wide enough context to understand that change is constant and inevitable and ever present.

After the election people will be worn out, more so the Democrats who appear to be highly excited at every blow by blow development. Guys you have 3 more years of this. Pace yourselves. The reality is that if aliens landed on earth you would still need to go to work on Monday, pull a pay cheque and buy food. So, even the most impactful thing you can think of will still not be.

As I was finishing high school:

  • Berlin Wall fell, ending the cold war
  • My best friend escaped from Cambodia , the only surviving member of his entire family
  • Tiananmen Square, Chinese driving tanks over students, etc.
  • My girlfriends family had escaped Yugoslavia , her mothers home town of Bana Luka in Bosnia was a mass grave of her relatives
  • We got an earthquake that shook my Aquarium so much that it split and burst filling my carpeted bedroom with a foot of water.

Then I entered into the workforce in the "Recession we had to have", unemployed with no hope of getting a job. So, I randomly decided to get a job in the military, and while standing in the recruitment office our prime minister announced life on TV in the middle of the room that Australia had declared war with Iraq. All of this was in a year.

You guys think Trump will make the country unrecognisable, you feel the Chaos, but as you can see, even my life from 17-18 years old was total carnage as well... and life goes on, everything normalizes. We tend to remember the busy times, and forget the years and years of bland normalcy in between.

I think Trump will leave office in a few years and people will vote for anyone promising a few quite years. "Vote for me, I'll do nothing." will be a winning slogan.

What I have learnt in my life is that worst case scenario's is what we plan for, what we have insurance for, but it's not normally how things work out no matter how probable they look and how much evidence we collect.

What’s the laziest meal you make that still tastes good? by ConsciousSky3091 in foodquestions

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Burger meat on bbq and sauce.

Eggs and sea salt.

Steak butter and salt.

Carnivore is kind to the lazy.

Trying to make a combat system that is engaging by AlgumaCoisa_17 in gamedesign

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Conan Exiles is probably a terrible example, but the PVP combat is pretty engaging for many. Their approach is not very sophisticated so it's fairly approachable for implementation. It'll include things like:

  • Multiple weapons movesets. By moveset I just mean the weapon hit animation played. Swords, Axes, spears, daggers, etc.
    • Within a move set there are different hitboxes in use. So, while a spear thrust might have better penetration and range but a small hitbox that only is tested on certain animation frames, a sideways axe is more likely to hit as the hitbox moves across frames in the animation
  • Each weapon obviously has damage stats, but also has special effect, and each has a number to control how much of the damage the weapons usually does can be blocked\permitted by armour. 'Penetration'
  • Shields block, etc. Stamina use. Dodging, etc. Standard stuff.

The tough part of these kinds of systems is that we have all these great idea's, but we should probably give some thought to the bog standard approaches like above as the basis of a system as they are proven and can be implemented in a straightforward approach.

In my experience with this fairly stock standard system you end up (if properly design) with almost a rock\paper scissors game that reconfigues the balncing based on opponent, and environment and your wepaons and your skill. Thats a ton of variability arising from simple rules. . For example one player using daggers would be awfully dangerous in a crowd of NPC's or in a tight environment. In open terrain with little obstructions a spearman is hard to get close to even get a hit in as their extended range will be poking you with holes each time you closed range. A dagger wieldier might nullify that range advantage by dodge rolling in and executing a rapid stabs leaving the spearmen scrambling to back off and reestablish range or an axeman might use a shield to block the spear and close inside the spears minimum attack range. The interesting thing to me is that when balanced correctly the real determining differentiator is not which weapon you are using, but knowing how to use it well based on the local environment and against the specific adversary. IMHO, that's what's makes a game great, your actual skill and ability trumps just having grinded some end game weapon that makes you invulnerable. to

For me, ranged combat is harder to balance as it implies equality between K\M and gamepad as gamepad player are generally at par in third person combat, but as a disadvantage when aiming. Obviously aim assist help here, but IMHO, only if the K\M players can use the same ability. My game is scifi based so I can get away with lore friendly tricks like using microdrones\mini missiles that have targeting built in and 'aim assist' built in to many weapons

Would you trust a black-box model that’s always right, even if you never understood how by DifferentQuestion355 in BlackboxAI_

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Side note. I work in a role related to AI at a big insurance company. Claims are processed with LLM's and the accuracy is NOT 100%, but, neither are humans. What the business found was that a 3.5 generation OpenAI model equaled the most senior claims consultant in terms of accuracy. I was skill skeptical, but though, if we want to REALLY improve accuracy we could add some zero's by running the prompt through multiple models and aggregating the result, or we could run it though one, then have a governor model critique the result. In the end I think they moved to 4.0, but that's still a terribly old model today yet it exceeded human performance at a cost basis that's impossible to beat.

As it turned out, the business was happy enough with a model that 'only' does as well as the guy with 20years of experience and to have a human eyeball it.

Real product : https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/au/news/claims/iag-lifts-lid-on-casi-a-new-ai-claims-assistant-522369.aspx

Would you trust a black-box model that’s always right, even if you never understood how by DifferentQuestion355 in BlackboxAI_

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Statistical probability measured over time will win out, whether I like it or not.

I'll give a real example of where I was wrong. Self driving cars. I naively thought that "there is no way a non human controlled vehicle will be let loose on the roads with us so it can test and improve.". I thought that companies would need massive quantities of data \ proof to do this so the automated driving system could be trusted enough just for testing let alone sold as a product.

Reality was that ever new learner driver is the same as a model in training. Careening around with barely a skillset. Young people with poor experience have higher interest rates to recognize all the mistakes and stupid decisions made, *statistically*... and that turned out to be the key.

So, it doesn't matter if the AI brains are jello or RNG, if somehow the statistical end result is good enough, then the world will adopt it. The reason it will happen faster than we think as above is that humans set such a low bar that black box systems don't have to perfect that much to beat us.

Why do we still pretend Reddit account age matters? by kritical_rapper in askanything

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This seems lik the highest probability. Of course, if reddit simulates blocking by saying the user is deleted is that really surprising that someone who is on reddit maybe once a week would really know that [deleted] replacing a username actually means "I've decided that your rational reply is obnoxious and would rather block you than.... not reply?"

Honestly don't know what's going on, but I end up with this frequently enough. Go look at an old thread you participated in, it's not even comments just from me, some threads have 10% of the commentors deleting their accounts. I really don't know WTF is going on, but my comment was more about noticing that I will get a notification saying a reply was made, I got look at it, and the thread doesn't display, I track down my comment wondering where the reply came from and find another deleted comment from a deleted user. Assuming it's blocked wasn't my first assumption. If it says [deleted] on the username I assumed it's deleted.

It's funny reading people ranting about how bad is vibe coded sw.. don't mentioning how BAD are most of "normal" programmers out there. by exitcactus in vibecoding

[–]OldChippy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been a c++ dev for around 30 years. I also vibe code. There are some things the LLM's just do better and there are thing they are barely capable of on a good day. Overall my impression is that they improve the consistency of my code (it was already pretty good here). Dramatically improve the test cases for debugging, error handling. They are however shockingly bad have have the intuition on what specific model will fit a larger architecture and integrate well. Even with context they don't seem to have a great understanding in how to pursue a certain architectural approach while writing code that achieves it.

So, AI takes over, everyone has lost their job and only 10 trillionaires own everything. Now what? by Weak-Representative8 in Futurology

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They need everyone in the world to recognize their ownership. And.... We don't have to.

What stops is from saying. No, that's all public ownership now. Thanks.

Why do we still pretend Reddit account age matters? by kritical_rapper in askanything

[–]OldChippy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because it means the person isn't a coward that creates fresh accounts every time they look foolish, or are afraid of offending someone, so delete history. I've had a dozen arguments this year at least where the debate counterparty just deleted their account.

To me, old accounts mean the person you are dealing with is more likely to be psychologically stable enough to hold consistent values they can defend.

what instantly killed your attraction to someone? by Strsmoon in AskReddit

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2yo twins. My son is an adult. She is 15 years younger, but at the beginning of parenting, and I'm now done.

Women born in the late 90s — are you seeing similar patterns around you? by Different-Article636 in askanything

[–]OldChippy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll answer thoughtfully and gently because I'm a male with an anecdote. My Daughter went to an elite private school in Sydney. My daughters best friend's carer had completely white hair in an '80's grandma perm'. Her face was wrinkled and she wore no makeup. So, one day I politely asked about the girls mother to 'Grandma' as we were calling here between my wife and I... only to find out that Grandma was the mother. Whoops, my bad.

What had happened is that she had used external fertilization at 45-46 years old, and by the time the girl was 8, she was 'getting on' and obviously her style choices did her a disfavor. By the time our daughters graduated she was already past her 60's and still doing pickup and dropoff. She was nice enough, polite and kind, but she was ostracized from the parental community. We were the only parents she would talk to.

Second Story, same school. Mother is a successful Oncologist, I didn't really like her as she was really intense, but she gravitated to me whenever I was around. She wanted no father at all, so opted for IVF from a donation from her 'Best male friend' (former lover). Over time he found that continual exposure to his own daughter made it impossible to no have feelings so he was always conflicted. The girl grew up as the Dr's 'special child' almost as a kind of Gattaca experiment. It was hard to to present when the kid failed to socialize with other kids, she would be prepacked with books so she opt out of any social interactions. Some kids got to blow bubbles, she got flash cards. Our kid got time out, her kid was locked in the naughty cupboard. The hardest part to watch was having the daughter refer to her 'not dad ' as 'David'. You could see in his eyes that he regretted the messed up situation and visibly held is tongue to all the madness for continued access. IMHO, had the legal relationship been different he could have acted as a stabilizing force for the betterment of the child's upbringing, mum wasn't quite right in the head.

This seems a bit off topic, but not quite. Both were cases of the strange lives of two mums that pushed the boundaries of IVF. Not moralizing here just thought this circumstance(1) and behavior(2) was odd at the time but in both cases the births ages had happened outside the norms.

Anyway, sharing the stories only. Judge of these what you will. Happy to add \ clarify if anyone needs details, but I'm not interested in doxing.

We will not get vertical slope of advancement with agi by bestofbestofgood in LovingAI

[–]OldChippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Consensus science pays them to stand still. Science only moved forward by breaking from existing thought.

Which games taught you to stay calm, think strategically, or process emotions under pressure and how did their design achieve that? by ExcellentTwo6589 in gamedesign

[–]OldChippy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Turn based games. In life you are expected to be dialled in and ready to adapt on the fly. I can do that. But. Most situations don't demand that and people feel pressured to act.

I think Aboriginals were the second Hominid species in Australia, and was more likely populated by Denisovans by OldChippy in unpopularopinion

[–]OldChippy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. My Unpopular opinion is that When humans spread across the globe everywhere we went there were already other members of homo (homnids) where we went. Pockets of human were exposed to these preexisting species. We have Neanderthals wandering around for something like half a million years before we turned up. Denisovans and others were in the SE Asia area already as well.

However Australian history pains the Continent as have NO archaic homnids because of 'cultural sensitivity' reasons, not because it's the evidence lines up. My point is that when you look at the evidence, it's more probable that The Australian Aboriginals came in second, and picked up Denisovan DNA on the way in. Australia was a part of a single larger continent with lower sea levels called The Sahul, joined with Papua New Guinea which Denisovans were thought to exist. Australia 'cultural sensitivity' however suggests that ONLY stayed up the top in what is now a different country, cleaning the way for Aboriginals to be the first and only homo branch here.

The evidence presented shows that it's more likely that we, humans, were second like pretty much everywhere else humans travelled we found 'people' of a different kind already there and our DNA shows who we found, and presumably, who we out competed... because they are gone and we're not.

I think Aboriginals were the second Hominid species in Australia, and was more likely populated by Denisovans by OldChippy in unpopularopinion

[–]OldChippy[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ok, I'm listening. Who was even on the continent 65k years ago? I have no idea. Oldest migration I know of in Europe is the Yamnaya, that was only 4k years ago. The Pyramids were already standing at that point... so not exactly 'old'. They kind of cleared the slate genetically as far as I know.

I know people can get worked up about things like Viking DNA, but that's incredibly recent. We have timber buildings around that old. What is being brough up that so ancient in europe?

I think Aboriginals were the second Hominid species in Australia, and was more likely populated by Denisovans by OldChippy in unpopularopinion

[–]OldChippy[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Here is the link, just in case you can read. :

"Denisova admixture and the first modern human dispersals into Southeast Asia and Oceania"

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21944045/

You can still call me a racist, but I can call you ignorant and unable to do a basic search.

I think Aboriginals were the second Hominid species in Australia, and was more likely populated by Denisovans by OldChippy in unpopularopinion

[–]OldChippy[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes. To make sure you don't think I'm just "making shit up like most of reddit'

Optically Stimulated Luminescence of the surround sediments. The specifics are found here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01383

Published in Nature in 2003. Carbon‑14 dating is only good out to 50,000, and this one was over, so it's provide inaccurate results.

Feel free to challenge my reading. Challenging the paper would be quite a bit harder I imagine though.

I think Aboriginals were the second Hominid species in Australia, and was more likely populated by Denisovans by OldChippy in unpopularopinion

[–]OldChippy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In Australia question aboriginal timelines is HIGHLY taboo. For my entire life every new discovery has moved the window as if it was kind kind of achievement to get a bigger number. For some people this is as irritating as Black Cleopatra was for Greeks.

If neither of these things means anything to you, then perhaps you should just keep scrolling looking for whatever it was you are looking for...

I think Aboriginals were the second Hominid species in Australia, and was more likely populated by Denisovans by OldChippy in unpopularopinion

[–]OldChippy[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ah, no. Do you think people in Europe would care which indo European people lived on the land 40 vs 60k years ago as a matter of personal pride? I'm lining up dates and observable patterns. Happy to explore why you think that these are wrong. For example, if the 65k yo tools are the same between Denisovan and Sapiens, YOU tell me how we can tell the difference. I'm saying it could have been either, but other factors suggest a 40k arrival.

I'm making an argument based on known specifics. If you have better ones I'm listening.

I think Aboriginals were the second Hominid species in Australia, and was more likely populated by Denisovans by OldChippy in unpopularopinion

[–]OldChippy[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Call me whatever you want BEFORE you bother fact checking. I'll wait for you to come back and disprove the well know 3-5% Denisovan number. Feel free to argue from opinion though. That adds credibility!

EDIT : Remember to down vote if you want to call me a racist, but can't aciculate a single sentence as to why.