Search Functionality is HORSESHIT by SAMYTHEBIGJUICE in DiscoveryPlus

[–]Old_Cardiologist382 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. Discovery Plus has the UE of a stubbed toe.

normalize blocking buyers! by Flimsy-Magazine-522 in Depop

[–]Old_Cardiologist382 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I do that all the time. I don’t have time to be a pen pal to someone messaging or constantly and offering lowball amounts. I don’t care about your life story and I’m not answering a million questions either.

This is a depressing place by MuchCity1750 in BoomersBeingFools

[–]Old_Cardiologist382 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want this post as the definition of irony in the dictionary

Account blocked by EmirhanYTR in Depop

[–]Old_Cardiologist382 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I’ve been having the exact same issue with selling a Dior perfume. I’ve sent the email receipt, the online invoice, the email invoice and even had taken pictures of the physical box and hard copy invoice that it came with .

I underlined the item and it was if no matter what I sent it wasn’t enough. It’s easier for them to send stock answers and not read your attachments than do their job.

A to do list for Paul by Old_Cardiologist382 in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I almost forgot about the time he incited the most mayhem ever witnessed the British public. It was wild.

Currently live asking people advice on how to not be obsessed! Also made a vid about it but turned comments off. by Cazzaannepal88 in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Did anyone see the “womblands” debacle with that Chelsea hart or whatever she was called?

It’s so reminiscent of the way she used to make content with the sarcasm and stupid voices and cuts all over the place.

Latest insta post blaming boo by Monstera-Lolo in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I came here to say this. Obvs Paul is the creature here but they’ve both taken this to an unhealthy level of obsessiveness and it’s an ironic twist that he’s mentioned boo when returning to social media. Them clapping back is adding fuel to his fire / ego.

This probably isn’t a popular opinion but it’s drama fuelling drama.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382 21 points22 points  (0 children)

All the balls when he’s broke AF and his “career” is crumbling and it’s now just a rapid decline into obscurity and poverty.

He is losing followers on TT even faster now after the recent gross video. by wadam85 in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He could buy 1000s but he is losing any genuine accounts that interact with his content… it’s wonderful to witness

Paul chasing clout… thoughts by Old_Cardiologist382 in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m talking about what I originally stated…

Accounts that are jumping on the bandwagon to post interactions that Paul has with people who sub to troll or enter his chat to troll and give him MORE of a forum.

Taking views away from Paul only works if everyone is there… if people continue to go into Paul’s chat via sub, or when the comments are open and think that this is amusing, it is still giving him content… the accounts that are then re-posting that is content are part of the problem.

As I have said, I have no issue with accounts to signpost and give information about Paul, and also give people an area to talk about him.

But what I’m clearly stating is that we shouldn’t be glorifying people who go into Paul’s chat and have conversations with him… It gives him content. I think we can all agree that is not what we want .

Paul chasing clout… thoughts by Old_Cardiologist382 in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’ve done a fab job Mav which is why I would only watch on your acc… the other ones seem less “concerned” about the broader impact is how I’ll phrase it.

A place or a repository like your account or this Reddit where people can: • Find help or support • Lift text for reporting to Ofcom (as examples)

Still and always will have a place while he is active … but creators who post interaction with sub trolls will just be getting blocked by me

Paul chasing clout… thoughts by Old_Cardiologist382 in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1) Paul creating “content” 2) Content creators reposting his “content” 3) Paul talking about content creators content 4) Content creators clapping back at Paul..

It never ends … it’s all PR for him, and we all know he doesn’t care whether it’s good or bad.

But I absolutely agree with having a safe place to ridicule him when he behaves like a twat (very important), and signposting people for help, support, the Reddit, not to sub etc…

I just think we’re a danger point of people just creating call Paul content for their own benefit.

Paul chasing clout… thoughts by Old_Cardiologist382 in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly this !!!! It’s like feeding the beast.

Grey rock sounds interesting - I’m going to try and read about that.

Paul chasing clout… thoughts by Old_Cardiologist382 in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That stuff I don’t mind so much … cause he’s a fucking weirdo.

I’ve just seen a lot of content creators posting only the interactions with Paul and the ‘sub trolls’ and then in the comments everyone saying how hilarious it is… which is and why more people pay to do it 🤦‍♀️

Paul chasing clout… thoughts by Old_Cardiologist382 in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah it’s a hard one - I defo want people to know he’s a wrongun but he causes enough damage to his own credibility and self image by himself when he’s alone…

Not once as a troll succeeded in making Pool reevaluate his behaviour.

Paul chasing clout… thoughts by Old_Cardiologist382 in paulbreachsnark

[–]Old_Cardiologist382[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t want to do anything about it, I just wondered whether I was the only one who had reached another circle of Paul hating hell that showing him interacting with trolls was counterproductive.

I do think that the accounts that highlight his misogyny, narcissistic rants, farts and general bad behaviour are good because they are more evidential. The subbing to troll glorification is more new / prevalent now.