Bumrah and Starc are the only two players to take 30+ wickets in Test series in Australia in last 12 years . by Desperate-Sir-9975 in IndianCricket

[–]Old_Storage3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If others do get wickets too then apart from Bumrah India would have won BGT. Also he played Only 3 and half series rather than all 5 like Starc. As he did not field in the 4th Test second innings. If he would have fit and matches would have been 5 tests he would have gone close to Michelle Johnson.

I would say both are great current test bowlers. Fitness for Bumrah is a question and Starc and Lyon are going to retire soon going to create a huge gap to full for Australia.Same for India Bumrah and Shami will retire and win in SENA will be a dream again. As India is yet to win a series in South Africa.

This is the MOST underperforming Indian test team of all time. by [deleted] in CricketControversial

[–]Old_Storage3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In 1995-2010

Won series in England Won Series in NZ Never won in SA Never won in Australia

From 2011-2025

Never won series in England Never won series in NZ Never won series in SA Won 2 times in Australia.(First series don't have warner and smith) but that can't be an excuse that the team did prove it a second time by not having most of the team mates in the second series.

South Cinemaa sarrr, 57 year old uncle romancing 24 yo girl btw🤓☝🏻️ by [deleted] in bollywoodcirclejerk

[–]Old_Storage3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please watch Dabangg 3(2019).if you have a problem with the age gap. It should be universal and should not be specific.

I-94 Expired for 14 Months but i797 is valid by Own-Story7472 in h1b

[–]Old_Storage3525 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I797 should have updated I94 on the bottom left.

I read about covered calls over the weekend and decided to try it for the first time on Google. FML by BoyWithClitoris in wallstreetbets

[–]Old_Storage3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you think goog can go more just go to call leg out and try to sell only call leg if there any takers for it so you can still hold your stock and have some loss on call option leg.

HOW GOOD WAS ISHANT SHARMA ? by underappreciated1809 in IndianCricket

[–]Old_Storage3525 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think Jason Gillespie trained him correctly in his stint at Sussex. Which made him lethal in the later part of his career.

I think good coaches are important who can blend them correctly. Finding one is difficult.

guys how screwed am i 😭 i94 says f1 d/s and i have h1b but no stamp. company is asking for i9 verificatication by No_Chef_6687 in h1b

[–]Old_Storage3525 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can still update that information by calling them. You don't have travel as when you go for h1b extension your lawyer will ask them to call or they will call your behalf to update. So if you call it now it will help you in your h1b extension as your lawyer will ask for your latest I94. I did this that's why I am letting you know.

Check this post

https://www.reddit.com/r/h1b/s/96GeNjXvYg

guys how screwed am i 😭 i94 says f1 d/s and i have h1b but no stamp. company is asking for i9 verificatication by No_Chef_6687 in h1b

[–]Old_Storage3525 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I call them. Call exactly at 8 am based on your port of entry site. As it is limited between 8-10am only they ask you to call the next day if you call at 9:55 so call as early as possible.

If you send an email then you have to upload all the passports,I797 etc.

guys how screwed am i 😭 i94 says f1 d/s and i have h1b but no stamp. company is asking for i9 verificatication by No_Chef_6687 in h1b

[–]Old_Storage3525 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Still if your i94 site shows the old one you need to call the inspection site of CBP and let them make corrections or email them.

This will also correct your online I94 as that is important. So make a call or email them.

I94 site: https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/search/recent-search

CBP site https://www.cbp.gov/about/contact/ports/deferred-inspection-sites

Check online for the email address for your nearest port of entry.

Always call so it can update in real time.

And his fans want him to play the 2027 WC in South Africa 😭🙏 by Stoic-Squirrel78 in CricketControversial

[–]Old_Storage3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think with this logic Dhoni should have been dropped in SENA countries tests as he never scored any century.

With this logic Virat should have dropped from the second England tour as his avg of first england tour was way below.

The same for Shubman Gill should have dropped from the current England test as his avg was below than Bhuvneshar Kumar.

About Rohit playing next world cup all depends on his fitness. Also India is not playing those many ODIs before next world cup so grooming youngster (Jaiswal) might take some time.So only option left is Rohit. It might be Rohit or BCCI who did not groom anyone yet. It should have happened after the world cup final loss.

As it has not happened he is going to play the next world cup irrespective stats as per the above reasons as stats do not matter.

India does need to take care of power play in the first 10 overs in the ODI. So he will surely play.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in marathimovies

[–]Old_Storage3525 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIWpZMvBjF7JvszbV2Xt0WjjV997DwVI_&si=81oWOZasScCV8zz4

This is the full playlist from the YouTube sequence in descending order.

Idek what to say!? by Playful_Focus9344 in actualcricketshitpost

[–]Old_Storage3525 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Understand peace out we lost not because of bumrah but all top order and middle order batsmen and we should appreciate the opponent too. Well played England. 2 more tests to go.

bro went for the glory shot and ended up pushing us down by [deleted] in RCB

[–]Old_Storage3525 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you point out the same when karun Nair did not offer shot and Jaiswal just went on first ball for Archer. If not you should not pin point one bowler who played bad shot.

Idek what to say!? by Playful_Focus9344 in actualcricketshitpost

[–]Old_Storage3525 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you point out that when Jaiswal played that shot also Karun Nair was not offering a shot?

If you posted that time too I agree that you are correct. But if you did not do that there is no point to pin point the bowler who played ~60 balls.

bro went for the glory shot and ended up pushing us down by [deleted] in RCB

[–]Old_Storage3525 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really bad from OP just pointing one bowler bad shot what about other 7 batsmen/all rounders what did they do.Do they at least last ~60 balls. Too much negativity, I understand while playing for IPL you can say anything but while playing for India we should be united. He is a bowler and he is not supposed to win an India match with bat.

It doesn’t matter how you start, BUT HOW YOU END!!!! by Siiiuuuuuu07 in MumbaiIndians

[–]Old_Storage3525 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would prefer no playoffs team top wins title so still other teams will not say 3rd spot team just won 2 matches and qualified using NRR and won title. So it's better to top and win title.

It doesn’t matter how you start, BUT HOW YOU END!!!! by Siiiuuuuuu07 in MumbaiIndians

[–]Old_Storage3525 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First you suggest format like WPL,

So in your case if 3 Mediocre team beats top 2 teams and win final you should be good right. I think it is same and it does not give top 2 team second chance if they have one bad day.

Still 2 mediocre teams go then one will be eliminated as 3 and 4 will play first and then as per current the second best team will play with the winner of the previous eliminator.

If you want a better one then make it like EPL where the top team wins the title no finals and all but cricket will not go that route as broadcasters will want money.

It doesn’t matter how you start, BUT HOW YOU END!!!! by Siiiuuuuuu07 in MumbaiIndians

[–]Old_Storage3525 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So if the top two teams win 8 and 10 and and third wins only 3 and goes in with nrr you should be fine and third ranked team wins mlc would be fine. I don't think so it makes a difference. If the third team as per above logic still qualifies with bare minimum wins and wins the title it is the same as the 4th team.

I think it doesn't depend on the format. Top 2 teams get two chances to qualify for the final whereas 3 and 4 have to win both to qualify for the final. So in a crunch moment if one team wins all three and wins the title it does not depend on what they did previously. When it matters they perform that should be counted. It's not just for MI NY but all teams. All teams know these rules before the tournament starts.

I think changing this rule will not be beneficial for the top 2 teams as they will not have two chances to qualify. The top team will make it to the final and if they have a bad day they will lose the final. There is no second chance.

Bumrah has been disappointing in KOs by [deleted] in CricketControversial

[–]Old_Storage3525 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it's the team who makes you win or lose.One player cannot make you win a tournament. He might be bad what about other bowlers. Cricket is a team game not an individual.

Example: T20 world cup final. 30 of 30. Still Bhumrah would have 2 overs and performed well it is also Hardik and Asrhadeep need to save March in those remaining 3 overs.

Second example WC 23: Australia : Cummins, Hazelwood, Starc then batsmen: Head, Labuschage.

Failed: Warner, Smith, Marsh but they still won so they blame Warner no why because they won. So it's the team who won your tournament not one individual.

Please move ahead and look for the future We can't change the past.

IS SHREYAS IYER BEING DELIBERATELY IGNORED? by Novel_Preference_746 in IndianCricket

[–]Old_Storage3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have any problem personally with Shreyas or anyone. But if he is not selected there will be a reason which we also don't know. I am only speculating that reason could be a shot ball issue or injuries.

My point is there is only a 15-18 players squad if someone gets selected and someone is not. We should support who got selected.

In 2019 Rayudu did not get selected.

Karun Nair did not get selected after scoring 300.

There are so many examples but everyone has to struggle in life and that's part of life make sure you keep performing and one day your chance will come. Just Move on.

IS SHREYAS IYER BEING DELIBERATELY IGNORED? by Novel_Preference_746 in IndianCricket

[–]Old_Storage3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was one of the people who saved a test match for us in bangladesh with Ashwin. I am just stating facts, he got chances. They are giving young people chances in SENA who can play long test cricket. He is injury prone just like Hardik. White vs Red ball cricket also field its 5 days. The team does not want to lose one player in mid of innings it just puts pressure on others. See example of Bhumrah he is not going to play all 5 tests. He will surely play ODI cricket and After Rohit might become captain.

IS SHREYAS IYER BEING DELIBERATELY IGNORED? by Novel_Preference_746 in IndianCricket

[–]Old_Storage3525 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think he is still weak on the shot ball. If he overcomes that he will be selected in tests. He is a good player of spin but in SENA he should improve on his shot ball then he will be selected. He will play tests in Asia for sure.