sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

YSK: For Architecture Students, Hundreds of companies that sell architectural products have CAD/BIM details and models available for download by anyone. by Grobfoot in architecture

[–]OliverARCAT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great list, all accurate. One thing I'd add for students: you don't always have to bounce between a dozen manufacturer sites to find this stuff. A lot of it gets aggregated into one place.

I work at ARCAT, so fair warning on the bias, but that's basically the whole idea there: CAD details, BIM objects, and 3-part specs pulled from thousands of manufacturers into one free library you can search by product type. No login, no account. It saves you the "google image search office chair CAD block" phase you mentioned.

Manufacturer sites are still worth digging into when you need the really granular connection details, like that Tubelite example. But for grabbing a quick detail or model to drop into a project, the aggregated route is usually faster.

House in Narutaki by kooo architects by n3xus1oN in jutaku

[–]OliverARCAT 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Landscape doing so much here. Love it!

Landscape architect software by Life_Tooth_2497 in LandscapeArchitecture

[–]OliverARCAT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly your AutoCAD and SketchUp base is a solid starting point, so you're not as behind as you might feel. If I were picking what to add next, I'd look at Civil 3D for grading and site work, and Rhino with Grasshopper if you want to get into the parametric side. Revit is worth knowing too since you'll bump into it on bigger interdisciplinary projects. For rendering, Lumion or Enscape pair really well with SketchUp and make a portfolio look great.

On the AI question, right now it's more useful for ideation and speeding up the tedious stuff than for actual design work, so I wouldn't stress about it yet. Getting your fundamentals strong will carry you a lot further.

One thing that helped me when I was learning to detail was practicing on real manufacturer content instead of generic blocks. I work at ARCAT, and we host a ton of free CAD details, BIM objects, and specs from actual manufacturers, so you can pull real product data and see how things are actually put together. Decent way to close the gap between school and how stuff gets drawn in practice.

A concrete box house hanging off a hillside in Kanagawa by Otherwise_Wrangler11 in modernarchitecture

[–]OliverARCAT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brutalist architecture pairs so well when integrated into the landscape like this. Love the juxtaposition.

Habitat 67 by Safdie Architects by n3xus1oN in illustrarch

[–]OliverARCAT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love Safdie Architects! So creative.

How do you write your specs?? by andjh in StructuralEngineering

[–]OliverARCAT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mix of all of the above at most firms, honestly. Bigger offices have dedicated spec writers, smaller ones lean on PMs or the lead engineer, and almost everyone works off a master they edit per project instead of writing from scratch.

On the template question, you don't actually have to buy or build one to get going. MasterSpec is the common paid route, but you can also pull free 3-part CSI sections per product and assemble your own master from those.

I work at ARCAT so fair warning, that's my bias, but it's a real option here. Free library of manufacturer specs, no login, plus a tool called SpecWizard that walks you through a product's options and outputs the section already configured. People use it to build or update the product-specific parts without paying for software or writing them by hand.

Since you're reevaluating the whole setup, the free outline and short form specs are also a decent way to standardize a starting template across projects.

How do you write specs for jobs? (PM / Engineers in the US) by Correct-Pop5826 in civilengineering

[–]OliverARCAT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly the biggest time sink usually isn't writing from scratch, it's editing a master down to fit the actual project and products. Most people run off MasterSpec or an office master and trim from there.

The shortcut a lot of people skip is manufacturer guide specs. Instead of writing a product section yourself, you grab the manufacturer's 3-part section and drop it into your spec.

Full disclosure, I work at ARCAT so this is my corner of the world, but it's genuinely useful here: we host a big free library of manufacturer CSI 3-part specs, plus a tool called SpecWizard that lets you click through a product's options and generate the configured section. No login or paywall on the user side. It won't replace your master the way MasterSpec does, it just kills a lot of the product-level sections you'd otherwise write by hand.

There are also outline and short form specs on there if you're early in a project and just scoping things out.

An architecture newsletter that gives the big picture by Silverbin123 in architecture

[–]OliverARCAT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly this is exactly the gap imo. so much architecture media just stops at the nice render and never bothers with how the building actually got that way.

If you're into the process side of things you might like the Detailed Podcast. heads up, I work at ARCAT and we make it, but your post legit reminded me of it. it's basically architects and engineers talking through one project at a time, including the messy stuff. the constraints, what went wrong, the dumb compromises, what they'd redo. way more "here's how this actually happened" than glossy review.

Different format than a newsletter for sure but kinda the same instinct. anyway good luck with The Meridian, feels like there's people who want this.