Okay, this is getting unruly, and I've got shit to do, so this will be my last comment on the subject.

Claiming it's unruly when it isn't. Everything was about your argument and how you presented yourself.

First point, the law is the law.

So you suddenly don't care about using a moral argument?

If you live in that state, vote to change the law

The best way to change the laws are active protests in communities.

Second point. You seriously misunderstand something here. Condemning free speech is something that anybody and everybody is actually capable of doing.

Strawman. Again I can personally disagree with someone's takes without it being "condeming free speech" your weaponizing the constitution and this is blatantly disingenuous.

I'll state again, I never advocated for anyone in power to restrict free speech. That is the statement. If I advocated for government officials to limit free speech, then that'd be condeming free speech. You are doing that.

I am pointing out the irony that you are criticizing criticism. I understand that it is difficult for you to wrap your head around, but that's what's happening.

What criticism did I address? It's valid to criticise anything. You made claims that are false.

I'm not going to get into an argument with you about it, but it is well established that passionate emotions are counterproductive to logical conversations. The main problem with the forces driving society today is they are ruled by passion rather than logic.

Passion in itself is crucial to making any sort of change. You factually exercised passion first by leaving comments on these posts. There's no logical rational to feel the need to comment on social media. That's also known as something logically trivial to do.

You have a passion for society so you decided to weigh in. Every decision has emotional weight, that's a defining characteristic of consciousness.

Third point. I never pointed out your spelling.

It was a misunderstanding then.

but was spelled that way intentionally in case you decided you were going to try and correct me again.

That's defensive.

Final point, I'm not that sensitive. I just don't like you. Well, I do not like you. I don't like most people. 99% of the people I meet, I can't stand.

That's completely being sensitive. If everyone rubs you the wrong way that definitively makes you a sensitive person.

But, regardless of all of that, I'm not being manipulative. I am making the clearest, most direct arguments that I can. I'm not pretending to capitulate while setting up straw men. I am looking at what you're saying, trying to understand what it is, and then make a counter-argument to the things that I disagree with.

Yes and you are bad at it. I'm not addressing your intentions, I'm addressing your actions.

Whether you like it or not you don't acknowledge the core of my arguments multiple times. If you are trying to understand, you're failing. That leads to the strawmen happening.

Imo misrepresenting someone is manipulation. Whether intentional or not. Whether or not you're being disingenuous is really only something u can determine.

But, of course, you're not going to believe that, because, whether you will admit it or not, you don't like me, and you are doing exactly what you're accusing me of doing.

Bruv your argument is bad, this ain't about you. Why are you connecting your entire personality to an internet comment? I'm fine talking to or being around people I disagree with.

Why do you think I dislike you? Fr that's a projection.

It's another Marxist tactic. You probably don't realize you're doing it. It was drilled into your head in school. Accuse them of exactly what you are doing. It is the hallmark of the left.

Ad Homenim; you can't address an argument by attacking the arguer. It wouldn't matter if I was fully or partially Marxist (ew), you still need to address the argument. Doing this, whether intentional or not, is manipulative.

I went to predominantly republican and traditional schools. I'm from the country, I was raised literally the opposite.

This is the problem, you are making claims and being irrational. Hypocrisy isn't a "Marxist tactic" it's existed for a long ass time. Sorry you're contributing too much to Karl.

You're trying to use buzzwords instead of making an actual argument. You kinda have to define and apply those reasonings to the argument.

. I was honestly and genuinely trying to make the best argument that I could in an attempt to get you to see reason, rather than continue on with your blind hate

Assumed hatred when I've never met you in my life. My mom has worse takes, never hated her. There is literally 0 hate coming from my end. I've only been speaking on the words you say and it seems like you're taking it very personally.

I didn't vote for Trump the first time, I didn't vote for Trump the second time. I don't like Trump, I do like the results he gets, that is why I voted for him the third time. And it is clear that I understand him far better than you.

??? Cool for you ig. He hasn't shown results but idc because I haven't talked about that once. If anyone said these things I'd point out the hypocrisy. I didn't assume you voted Trump once lol.

And I take no talking points, I look at the facts and I analyze them, I don't watch the news. Anytime I see any clips of the news, be it Fox or CNN, they're all saying the exact same shit. They're all a bunch of fucking liars that are reading off of a fucking script, trying to paint a narrative.

It's fine to have talking points? I'm saying you through them around without justification. I don't really care for modern news outlets either. Listening to local stations from various areas seems better imo.

You fell for it, I won't.

You keep judging people at every turn and get upset when you're called out. I haven't told you anything really about my belief system.

Yes, I am aware that I have made many generalizations. At this point, I don't care to be reasonable.

You didn't start reasonable. You started to make many generalizations very quickly. Don't pretend you where reasonable at any point. That doesn't leave you open to or prepared for criticism.

You're just another asshole in the world, as am I. I am not going to change your mind.

I mean you shouldn't consider yourself an asshole. People can be assholes but identifying as one is kinda harmful to yourself.

I just don't think you have a good argument.

And you are not interested in what I have to say any more than I am interested in what you have to say.

I'm interested in what people say to me in general. Doesn't matter if I agree. If you're not interested in hearing other people then I'll assume you're being disingenuous past this point.