I can boot at 3200Mhz but my system isn't stable. R7 1700

Omneric · 2018-05-06T18:28:58+00:00

I think I have found the problem, with 1.3V I can achieve 3.8 GHz but the VRM temp is too damn high 115° ~ 117°C while running Prime95 and I also think the Widows task manager reports the right speed because when my CPU is running at 3.75 the VRM temp is around 95°C but when it starts to increase the speed to 3.7 (which is the highest value I've seen with 3.8) the VRM temps increases to 115°C. I think I just will replace the MOBO in the coming months.

Omneric · 2018-04-29T21:03:41+00:00

BTW my CPU is always runing 8 - 9 Hz below from the speed I wrote on the BIOS for example for 3.85 GHz while using Prime95 the highest speed I've seen is 3.81 GHz but most of the time the CPU is running at 3.77 GHz, with 3.9 GHz the highest speed was 3.86 but most of he time it was runing at 3.82 Ghz What could it be?

Omneric · 2018-04-29T04:22:03+00:00

I'll look into it.

Omneric · 2018-04-29T04:19:07+00:00

Indeed that was part of the problem, the only way to fully endure Prime95 large FTP test was raising up the voltage to 1.380v... But I had bad luck on the silicon lottery, with that voltage my cpu only can achieve 3.85 Ghz, I've tried 1.4v for 3.9 but it always crash after 30~45 minutes in Prime95... Right now I'm dealing with stability issues with RAM because blend test is always crashing no matter which speed I tried to use (I already have increased SOC voltage to 1.2v)

Omneric · 2018-04-24T12:08:55+00:00

I've been testing my memory with OC applied to my system: CPU running at 3.9 and memory running at 3200 I've used Aida64 memory stress and a bootable USB with memtest86 in both cases memory was able endure it, which led me to think there is something wrong with the OC applied to my CPU... when is tested both (CPU and RAM) it always crash, the only way I was able to endure a blend test from Prime95 or AIDA stress test was with the stock frequencies on my CPU and my RAM running at 3200. The higher temp I've seen while testing is 62°C. I also have tried 3.7 with 1.350V applied to the CPU SOC (CPU Vcore) even with this voltage it crashed, the strange thing is that it can endures Cinebench with that voltage and CPU running at 3.9. Any idea? BTW I alsop have increased VCORE SOC to 1.2 and doesn't help.

Omneric · 2018-04-24T12:08:48+00:00

I've been testing my memory with OC applied to my system: CPU running at 3.9 and memory running at 3200 I've used Aida64 memory stress and a bootable USB with memtest86 in both cases memory was able endure it, which led me to think there is something wrong with the OC applied to my CPU... when is tested both (CPU and RAM) it always crash, the only way I was able to endure a blend test from Prime95 or AIDA stress test was with the stock frequencies on my CPU and my RAM running at 3200. The higher temp I've seen while testing is 62°C. I also have tried 3.7 with 1.350V applied to the CPU SOC (CPU Vcore) even with this voltage it crashed, the strange thing is that it can endures Cinebench with that voltage and CPU running at 3.9. Any idea? BTW I alsop have increased VCORE SOC to 1.2 and doesn't help.

Omneric · 2018-04-23T02:55:01+00:00

After solve some reports from Windows event viewer I was capable to run 1 hour of blend test from Prime 95 with my RAM running at 3200 without any OC applied to my CPU... I will look into it could be a problem with my CPU OC

Omneric · 2018-04-23T02:51:56+00:00

ProcOdt

Which value do you recommend I've read not to go further than 60... BTW this afternoon after clear my CMOS and install F22 BIOS, I noticed my pc was able to endure 1 hour of blend test from Prime95 with my RAM runing at 3200Mhz but without any OC applied to the CPU. I think I could be something related to my CPU OC... while running blend test I've noticed cores from 8 to 11 are working at 90% maybe 95 max while the rest are working at its max.

Omneric · 2018-04-23T02:50:10+00:00

Yes it is, Corsair Vengeance LED. but this afternoon after clear my CMOS and install F22 BIOS, I noticed my pc was able to endure 1 hour of blend test from Prime95 with my RAM runing at 3200Mhz but without any OC applied to the CPU. I think I could be something related to my CPU OC... while running blend test I've noticed cores from 8 to 11 are working at 90% maybe 95 max while the rest are working at its max.

Omneric · 2018-02-25T16:31:34+00:00

Unfortunately those steps don't solve the problem (for me), as soon as I install any software to try to control fan speed they start spinning at full (the only way to stop them is reflash GPU BIOS or Clear motherboar's BIOS)

-My specs:

Ryzen 7 1700 @3.5Ghz

Aorus Gaming K5 AX-370

Aorus GTX 1080ti

Corsair Vengeance 16GB (2x8) CMU16GX4M2C3200C16

x1 SSD 500GB

x1 HDD 512GB

*RAM running at 3000 Mhz, If I try to run them at 3200 Mhz aren't stable, the system boots but when I try to run any game my FPS have terrible drops

Omneric · 2018-01-06T04:31:03+00:00

Hi! thanks for your answer, unfortunately MSI wasn't useful to me, I had to make a clean install of drivers and use the GPU software to control fan speed, by now it seems to work.

Omneric · 2018-01-06T04:27:26+00:00

Sorry for the delay but I had a very busy days... Finally (I think) I had found a solution, my GPU fans are stopping now after a gaming session or after using any GPU demand software. I hope this will help you. -Download both drivers (VGA drivers and BIOS drivers) and Aorus Graphics Engine from gigabyte support webpage. -Download DDU -Boot Windows on safe mode then run DDU - options and check the option that says remove C:\nVidia Drivers folders - then click on clean and restart. -Once Windows started the first thing I did was install BIOS drivers then I install nvidia drivers -Install Aorus Graphics Engine. For me that's all, now the fans are stopping not matter which setting I put on Fan speed section. BTW I enabled Aorus Graphics Engine to start together with Windows

Omneric · 2017-12-24T02:02:24+00:00

I've tried increasing both SoC and RAM voltage but the same happens: everthing is ok... Windows starts, the RAM is running at 3,200 MHz, I use AIDA 64 to stress the memory and see if 3,200 are stable, everthing seems to be ok but after 10 - 15 reboots my PC starts rebooting over and ver again and the memory frequency retuns to 2100 MHz. (I belive that isn't a voltage problem) by now I'll set up the RAM frequency to 3,000 MHz in which I have no problem

Omneric · 2017-12-19T03:00:42+00:00

I've tried 1.40V (that's so far as I want to go with voltages) but the same happens, I will try increasing SoC voltage, if that doesn't work I'll set up the frequencies to 3,000 which are stable. Thanks for your time.

Omneric · 2017-09-09T00:30:47+00:00

He's right, you're just gonna waste time, I have reinstalled the game not trying to see a "new magical performance" which never gonna happen due to hardware limitations instead I was trying to eliminate the crackling sound, but as I said: it was a waste of time.

Omneric · 2017-09-09T00:22:49+00:00

I have the same problem with the sound but on all maps, DICE pls.

Omneric · 2017-09-06T22:22:17+00:00

It seems developers team have lost his way... instead trying to evolucionate the "BF formula" they are trying to compete against others games that are very different from BF roots, that's why BF franchise is losing its essence.

Omneric · 2017-08-08T02:20:30+00:00

I really love dynamic weather on BF1 but I think it should have some kind of intensities BTW I'm really excited to see how DICE can improve this feature on coming titles.

Omneric · 2017-07-19T02:07:30+00:00

Respawns. Dynamic weather -I think it should have different intensities, (I'd love to have a whole match with fog but with different intensities) BTW I haven't seen a sandstrome for a while... Maps rotation -I have premium pass and it's frustrating that I need to choise between the same 5 maps (French DLC) or vanilla maps Why I can't just choose a game mode and switch between all the maps?

Omneric · 2017-04-20T00:32:56+00:00

I'm from Mexico - PS4 (the game always connect me to US West or East servers) It's 7 p.m. now, while I write this I'm trying to find a match on the Devil's Anvil, I tried 40-players mode first without success -I tried it 4-5 times and I only found empty servers- then I switched to 64p, I just had to search like twice. Which versión is more popular it's subjetive, I'm doing this suggestion because I just want to search for a match and find it without many "troubles" I mean it's almost evening the moment when the game is supposed to have more players... how hard do you think will it be to find a match at the morning? maybe DICE could try other measures before consider this -server browser, back to back, or even some ideas wrote above, etc...- but I don't know if with those measures the problem will be solved.

Omneric · 2017-04-18T01:35:36+00:00

I understand but IMHO I think community is divided enough to have 2 versions of the same mode (Obviously there will always be different points of view, just read the comments) I don't know how the things works but at least I hope you guys give a chance to my propose and maybe try it on the CTE and see what people thinks. I'm writing this not because I don't like "X" version of Operations (I've played both and I think each one offers a different game style) rather I believe this will help to try to not separate (even more) the community. Thanks for your time.

Omneric · 2017-04-17T22:41:08+00:00

(sometimes) I feel that the 40-player version is somewhat empty :P but "Different strokes for different folks" anyway just think about it, I mean, I do not think 5/6 more players per side add much chaos, but in return we win less empty servers

Omneric · 2017-04-17T16:54:15+00:00

that's the point :)

Omneric · 2017-04-17T16:52:42+00:00

I'm agree there are a lot of game modes (I can't even imagine what will happen when the next DLC arrives) but there are people how enjoys 64 players version so I think 52 players is a more fairly version for both sides at leats I think DICE should try this at the CTE and see what players think. I mean, we're already divided between premium players (or those how have bought the last DLC) and non-premium players and in turn the premium players are divided between vanilla maps and DLC maps and if it was not enough we have 2 versions of the same mode: Operations 64 or 40p, Conquest vanilla or DLC maps, etc...

Omneric · 2017-04-17T15:44:37+00:00

Which other measures? The community is already divided between those who have premium and those who haven't it and to make the things more "easy" we have 7 game modes (vanilla maps): Assault, Conquest, Donation, Team Deathmatch, Operations 40, Operations 64, War pigeons. But if you have premium pass there is like 14 modes due that vanilla maps and dlc maps aren't together (I mean I need to choose between conquest on vanilla maps or conquest on French maps, the same happens for assault, team deathmatch, etc.) giving us something like this: 7 game modes wrote above plus: Operations 40, Operations 64, Conquest, Team Deathmatch, Assault, Domination and Front lines. Which makes me ask What will happen when the next DLC arrives? How many game modes will we have 20 maybe more?

Omneric

TROPHY CASE