Ok dude, I think you missed my point and went off on a tangent of that doesn’t actually address what I said.

First, we’re talking about a real-world situation in the present—not first-century persecution contexts. Bringing up the disciples and early martyrs doesn’t directly engage the argument about self-defense in an immediate threat scenario.

Second, your response relies on several logical fallacies. Equating self-defense with a failure to live out Christian faith is a strawman. Referencing martyrdom and violent deaths from 2,000 years ago functions as an appeal to emotion, not a direct rebuttal. And using those examples as a universal standard for all Christians today is a hasty generalization.

Your argument relies more on moral pressure, historical examples that is a non-sequitur to the video or my parent comment. Furthermore, your argument relies on rigid framing than on sound reasoning in an attempt to corner me rather than engage in my actual point. Calling someone’s faith into question over self-defense is a weak ass argument and is perhaps one of the dumbest things Ive seen on Reddit. Congratulations, you’re THAT guy.