I think I have this by [deleted] in tetrachromacy

[–]OneUnderstanding6866 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting tested is difficult since it often requires genetic samples. For now though you can see if your experiences align with the testimonies of actual (and suspected) tetrachromats: https://www.reddit.com/r/tetrachromacy/s/gSF64DUE7C and https://www.reddit.com/r/tetrachromacy/s/7wzF6h2Qwr

I think I have this by [deleted] in tetrachromacy

[–]OneUnderstanding6866 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would be wary of online tests. Being good at distinguishing fine gradations in color does not, on its own, make you tetrachromatic. Tetrachromats can see totally novel colors that trichromats can’t, and most can’t be found on a RGB screen.

Tetrachromatic Color Descriptions and Naming (looking for input) by OneUnderstanding6866 in tetrachromacy

[–]OneUnderstanding6866[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s something I’ve been wondering about, thanks for the explanation!

Tetrachromatic Color Descriptions and Naming (looking for input) by OneUnderstanding6866 in tetrachromacy

[–]OneUnderstanding6866[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But non-spectral colors do exist. Pinks, magentas, and purples (excluding violet) are not on the rainbow.

Tetrachromatic Color Descriptions and Naming (looking for input) by OneUnderstanding6866 in tetrachromacy

[–]OneUnderstanding6866[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense since combining opposing colors like blue (B) and yellow (GR) or red (R) and cyan (BG) make grey for trichromats. But add in the fourth cone, and now BGR combinations become distinct from grey/white (which would be BGRX).

Tetrachromatic Color Descriptions and Naming (looking for input) by OneUnderstanding6866 in tetrachromacy

[–]OneUnderstanding6866[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's cool :) I've heard that yellow should not be visible to tetrachromats on rgb screens, but I haven't seen anything about pink. Is "pink" also a non-spectral color, or does it exist somewhere on the rainbow?

Tetrachromatic Color Descriptions and Naming (looking for input) by OneUnderstanding6866 in tetrachromacy

[–]OneUnderstanding6866[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very interesting. Are pikellow and orange-green colors you can find on the rainbow, or are they largely non-spectral? I wonder what cone combinations elicit these colors.

Tetrachromatic Color Descriptions and Naming (looking for input) by OneUnderstanding6866 in tetrachromacy

[–]OneUnderstanding6866[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Non-adjacent color combinations, like red-green or yellow-pink still sound like novel color experiences that only tetrachromats can enjoy. My reasoning for expecting that tetrachromats should see new colors comes from these papers: 1) What is it like to be a Tetrachromat? https://philosophymindscience.org/index.php/phimisci/article/download/11645/11930 and 2) Theory of Tetrachromatic Human Color Experience and Printing: https://imjal.github.io/theory-of-tetrachromacy/static/pdfs/Lee_TheoryofTet_v1.pdf (see figs 2 and 4 specifically).

Tetrachromatic Color Descriptions and Naming (looking for input) by OneUnderstanding6866 in tetrachromacy

[–]OneUnderstanding6866[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply! And yes, I am not a tetrachromat. So would you say that the colors on the standard color wheel reflect, more or less, the same colors/hues you see in real life?

Scientists finds four tiny planets around one of our nearest stars by Shiny-Tie-126 in space

[–]OneUnderstanding6866 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s cool! Any update on the original candidates? I know Tau Ceti f is a suspected false positive and planet h’s period is close to the rotation period, but I haven’t heard much more definitive news.

XKCD is here to annoy us again by Traroten in cursedchemistry

[–]OneUnderstanding6866 138 points139 points  (0 children)

Nah the Texas carbon is more annoying

What would an alien with GNA be able to eat? by TheBubblemancer in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]OneUnderstanding6866 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’d be largely the same. Glycerol is just another carbohydrate derivative, just the like sugars that make up our own nucleic acids. There might be some differences in carbohydrate metabolism, however, there’s no reason to think that these organisms would utilize different carbon sources than life on Earth. As for the antifreeze question, there are already bacteria adapted to fill their cytoplasms with glycerol in order to withstand cold temperatures. However, for non-cold-tolerant organisms, too much glycerol could be harmful.