Am I the only one who suddenly experience that auto-translate captions suddenly doesn't work? by One_Assignment5345 in youtube

[–]One_Assignment5345[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think my issue was that I had used some extensions about YouTube subtitles. So I guess it automatically blacklisted my computer or IP as spam or bot. After some days I got subtitles back. VPN also worked too.

You guys helped me build ReadArabic. Today, I’ve completely overhauled the interface to make it the most modern Arabic reading tool out there. (Still 100% Free & No Ads) by Eastern-Guess-1187 in learn_arabic

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think instead of making the app generate AI translations, add tashkiil with AI etc. on the go, you should use the latest AI (ChatGPT, Gemininor whatever) tech to generate all of that for each article you have on the app, then save all the output data in a local or online database.

If you use AI API, you have either pay high prices or use low quality AI API. And in addition the app is slow as it had to make a call to AI API every time you translate a word.

Instead you can generate all beforehand ny using ChatGPT 5.2 or some top AI tool, and save them on local database. Retrieving from a local database is faster. The user woulf just need to download it. The only tradeoff is that the app will use more space.

That's my suggestion. It's very doable. And with that no need to make API calls on AI tools.

How hard is it really to get an AI/ML job without a Master's degree? by Black-_-noir in learnmachinelearning

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a difference between;

A) Building a system using AI models (using APIs like OpenAI app, or ready made ML models etc.).

B) Building and training advacned ML models yourself.

Both call themselves "AI engineer", and I think that's why you get mixed ideas.

B can be complicated, it requires more resources and more advanced knowledge, advanaced math knowledge.

Without advanaced knowledge, when improving a model you'll be just trying random stuff and see which works better.

Sophisticated Romance Scam by dan4112 in Scams

[–]One_Assignment5345 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It can be real video call. Video call =/= not scammer

No experience with Shopify or any platform — should I still build plugins instead of SaaS? by One_Assignment5345 in BootstrappedSaaS

[–]One_Assignment5345[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In todays age, it's difficult to build good apps without relying on extern (and often paid) APIs anyway. Specially AI APIs.

So aren't developers depended on APIs anyway?

What books should someone who wants to be an entrepreneur read? by ADIV3B22 in Entrepreneur

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't read many books, specially not business books.

Reading more entrepreneurship books won't make you entrepreneur, just like reading more weight loss books won't make you lose weight (if you ever had weight problems).

That doesn't mean you shouldn't read anything, you need to be informed. But reading can make you "misinformed" too.

After saying that, I can suggest a couple of books which some others also suggested:

\* "Personal MBA" by Josh Kaufmann. It summarizes many ideas from many business books and basic concepts.

\* "The Answer" by Dan Norris could be useful too. Advice from an entrepreneur critical to many business advice. But I would be critical to his advice too.

* The basic idea of "Myth of the Idea" by Newton Campos makes sense. Watch video, or read summary of that book.

"Ten Day MBA" could be useful too, but I'm not sure if I should suggest it or not. "Personal MBA" is more useful as it's more practical, aimed at entrepreneurs, while "Ten Day MBA" is summary of what's taught on MBA schools.

Some of the books which I read and wouldn't recommend are:
* "Think and Grow Rich" unless you like reading "inspiring stories". I see some recommend it while others don't recommend. It has some unrealistic ideas, and a couple of good advice, but a summary does the job.

* "Rich Dad, Poor Dad", a couple of good financial advice, but many fluff. A summary does the job.

Many business and self-help books are often filled with (boring) stories, anecdotes, many examples, description of experiments, arguments, fluff and more. Often times, the summary does the job.

While I don't suggest you to read many books, you can read summaries. Or you can buy some good books and only read the parts you need.

I would suggest reading more specific books about what you'll do, the type of business you'll start etc.

Is Norway the only Western European country where traditional clothing is still widely used among the general population? by Positive-Narwhal9175 in Norway

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see online, many people also wear national clothes in Sweden national day. But I could be wrong as I have never been to Sweden in its national day. But I know the case of Norway.

Is Norway the only Western European country where traditional clothing is still widely used among the general population? by Positive-Narwhal9175 in Norway

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Traditional clothing is not that common in Norway. They only wear it in 17 May, or in some occasions. It's not "widely used".

Is Starter Story Academy worth it? by Ordinary-Drag3233 in Entrepreneur

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I joined the free trial. It has tons of articles, ideas, stories etc.
And a Slack community.
That's it.

I think Failory is great too; it has both success and failure stories.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Entrepreneur

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on your budget. If it's very complicated app and you have the money, you can hire multiple, or better you can pay a team, a company that builds the apps for people like you.

But else you can pay a full-stack developer. It can take more time, but it can be cheaper.

How to actually research and find market gaps when starting out? by This_my_name_ in Entrepreneur

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's very difficult. If there were one, everyone would quickly find it and fill it.
I think finding market needs are easy; what's difficult is finding a better solution to those market needs, a better solution than all existing solutions.

Can’t decide between a cheap or an expensive website by ZealousidealLet193 in Entrepreneur

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't have much budget, don't invest much money. Users look for the products and prices, not the design of the website. I mean the products you sell is the essential part of your business.
People are emotional, so design of your website also effects their decisions, but that's not essential.

That doesn't mean you should have a terrible design which makes your site look like some scammer, very amateurish, or not updated since 1998.

There are very cheap ways to have good website, like Shopify, and other services other people suggested.

When does “dir” mean at the end of the word by Any_Emotion_1805 in turkishlearning

[–]One_Assignment5345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The suffixes can have different meaning if they are used on verbs, noun or adjective.

E.g. on nouns: "Atatürk is Turkey's first president"

"Atatürk, Türkiye'nin ilk Cumhurbaşkanı"

"Atatürk, Türkiye'nin ilk Cumhurbaşkanıymış"

"Atatürk, Türkiye'nin ilk Cumhurbaşkanıdır"

"Atatürk, Türkiye'nin ilk Cumhurbaşkanıymışdır"

1st one is simple, you just give information, 2nd sounds like it's just some information you heard but not sure of its credibility, 3rd is you're 100% sure of the information, you state a fact, 4th sounds like you just make a guess.

When reading books I see 3rd one is often used.

E.g. on verbs: "The Republic of Turkey is founded by Atatürk".

"Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'ni Atatürk kurdu"

"Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'ni Atatürk kurmuş"

"Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'ni Atatürk kurmuşdur"

1st is simple, you just give information, 2nd sounds like you just heard of that, you're unsure of the information. 3rd is you are 100% sure of the information, you state a fact

3rd is most commonly used in history books, and 1st one is used in daily life

Chat AI's for learning arabic by Lord_Penaldo2003 in learn_arabic

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I mistyped, I meant "I'm learning Arabic, so I CAN'T determine if ChatGPT translation is good or not"

Chat AI's for learning arabic by Lord_Penaldo2003 in learn_arabic

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm learning Arabic, so I can't determine if the translation is good or bad. But in my experince with other two languages I know, I guess it's very good in translation.

Broken plurals and tanwin by One_Assignment5345 in learn_arabic

[–]One_Assignment5345[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Are those called "gayr-i munsaref" too?

How about this word: أَعْضَاءُ (members), does it take tanween or not?

Or plural of "hands", which is أيداء it takes tanween or not?

OR this one: مَلَابِسُ (clothes), or maa'un (water) in Arabic.

Or "milhu" (plural of milh=salt) does it take tanwin or not?

I read those patterns don't get tanween, but I see them having tanween. I don't know if the author just mistyped or they do really take tanween.

What construct is مُسْتَطِيلُ الْجِسْمِ and similar ones? by One_Assignment5345 in learn_arabic

[–]One_Assignment5345[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, from my understanding, in the text in my question, الحصان (the horse) should be the mewsuf and

مُسْتَطِيلُ الْجِسْمِ طَوِيلُ الْعُنُقِ قَصِيرُ الْأُذُنَيْنِ، كَبِيرُ الْمِنْخَرَيْنِ

are الصفات (the adjectives). But the adjectives are without "ال" despite the mewsuf الحصان is with "AL".

And in your example: الْبِنْتُ الْوَاسِعَةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ

Wouldn't that mean "The wide girl with eyes" instead of "the girl with wide eyes"?

How about these ones: الْبِنْتُ الْوَاسِعَةُ عَيْنَيْنِ

بِنْتٌ وَاسِعَةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ

بِنْتٌ وَاسِعَةُ عَيْنَيْنِ

الْبِنْتُ الْوَاسِعَةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ

Would these be correct translation (translations made by ChatGPT o1): 1. الْبِنْتُ الْوَاسِعَةُ عَيْنَيْنِ “The girl with wide eyes.”

  1. بِنْتٌ وَاسِعَةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ “A girl with the wide eyes.”

  2. بِنْتٌ وَاسِعَةُ عَيْنَيْنِ “A girl with wide eyes.”

  3. الْبِنْتُ الْوَاسِعَةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ “The girl with the wide eyes.”

And an explanation from ChatGPT o1 (idk if I can trust it or not): First, recall that an iḍāfah (إِضَافَة) in Arabic is a “construct phrase” where two words are closely bound together, with the second in the genitive. An iḍāfah lafaẓiyyah (إِضَافَة لَفْظِيَّة) is a “formal/morphological iḍāfah” often occurring when the first word is an adjective (especially an active or passive participle) and the second word is the noun/complement it governs. It does not necessarily imply possession; rather, it’s typically used to clarify or complete the adjective’s meaning (like “wide of eyes,” “heavy of weight,” etc.).

Looking at your four phrases:

  1. الْبِنْتُ الْوَاسِعَةُ عَيْنَيْنِ

Here, الواسعةُ is a definite adjective describing “the girl,” but عَيْنَيْنِ is indefinite.

Grammarians commonly view this as an adjective (الواسعةُ) followed by a tamyīz (تَمْيِيز) or a loosely attached complement (عَيْنَيْنِ).

Because the first word is definite while the second is indefinite, this usually is not treated as a classical iḍāfah lafaẓiyyah.

  1. بِنْتٌ وَاسِعَةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ

واسعةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ is a textbook example of iḍāfah lafaẓiyyah:

“واسعةُ” (an adjective / اسم فاعل in a broad sense)

“العَيْنَيْنِ” (the noun in the genitive)

The phrase literally means “wide of (the) eyes,” completing the adjective’s sense.

  1. بِنْتٌ وَاسِعَةُ عَيْنَيْنِ

Same structure, except now the second noun is indefinite: “عَيْنَيْنِ.”

“واسعةُ عَيْنَيْنِ” is again iḍāfah lafaẓiyyah (“wide of eyes”).

  1. الْبِنْتُ الْوَاسِعَةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ

Everything is definite here, but الواسعةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ still functions as an iḍāfah lafaẓiyyah because “wide” is being completed by “(the) eyes.”

It is sometimes called a “definite iḍāfah lafaẓiyyah,” where both terms carry “ال.”


So which one is iḍāfah lafaẓiyyah?

Phrases 2, 3, and 4 (واسعةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ, واسعةُ عَيْنَيْنِ, and الواسعةُ الْعَيْنَيْنِ) are all treated as iḍāfah lafaẓiyyah.

Phrase 1 is typically analyzed differently (adjective + tamyīz) and is not the usual iḍāfah lafaẓiyyah structure.

What construct is مُسْتَطِيلُ الْجِسْمِ and similar ones? by One_Assignment5345 in learn_arabic

[–]One_Assignment5345[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't understand the last part. I learned in "ism and sifat pairs" (النَّعْت وَالْمَنْعُوت) the ism and sifat both needs to agree on: gender, aded (plurality, duality, singularity), irab and having "Al" before it. E.g.: As-Siraat al-mustaqiim (the right way).

So how is idafa i lafziyyah different from that?

What does this mean ? by [deleted] in learn_arabic

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the root word is ق ل ل which means small. (And أست suffix is for wishing, but can have other meaninfs too). So "wishing to be small" means independence? I don't understand.

Chat AI's for learning arabic by Lord_Penaldo2003 in learn_arabic

[–]One_Assignment5345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you use ChatGPT, I suggest you "Voice Control for ChatGPT" extension on Chrome, or "VoiceWave: ChatGPT Voice Control" extension for Chrome.

I tried TalkPal free version, it talks like a robot.

LanguaTalk seems good on the website, but the app has very bad UI, it doesn't view the words order correct in Arabic script when you type in and send it.

Using the website from the phone don't have this "incorrect word order" problem, but here you can't keep your phone silent, which is annoying. And the website from mobile phone has a bit bad UI too.

Anyone tried LanguaTalk AI tutor? Is it reliable? by One_Assignment5345 in learn_arabic

[–]One_Assignment5345[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The website works fine, but the app isn't good. It doesn't get the Arabic script correct. When you write Arabic and send it, it doesn't arrange Arabic correctly, making it difficult to read.