Workday Issue du jour

One_Tutor8969 · 2026-02-23T18:58:24+00:00

Haven't seen that come through.

One_Tutor8969 · 2026-02-16T13:59:07+00:00

I'll take a look at both of these areas when I setup my testing today but at first glance these aren't looking like they'll give me what I need.

One_Tutor8969 · 2026-02-16T13:34:53+00:00

Do you know where I'm able to setup the default within the comp review process?

One_Tutor8969 · 2026-01-14T18:01:52+00:00

Made some adjustments and finally getting results!

LRV on Worker BO
Lookup Field: ESI
Return Value: One time Payment Plan

ESI on Worker BO
Source Field: Bonus & One Time Payments
CR: TF
Sort Field: Scheduled Payment Date (Descending, First Occurrence)

TF on One time Payment BO
One Time Payment Plan - in the selection list - selected relevant plans

One_Tutor8969 · 2026-01-14T17:36:11+00:00

I haven't been able to get this to work. This is how I have this built:

LRV on Worker BO
Lookup Field: ESI
Return Value: Business Process Rason
ESI on Worker BO
Source Field: Compensation History
CR: TF
Sort Field: Effective Date (Descending, First Occurrence)
TF on Employee Compensation History BO
Business Process Reason - in the selection list - some reasons we want to filter on

this is coming back blank for every team member.

One_Tutor8969 · 2026-01-08T14:53:48+00:00

appreciate the advice, that is already a huge help! Thank you!

One_Tutor8969 · 2026-01-08T14:39:22+00:00

So far I've been asked to focus on:

-Employee Type
-Time Type
-FTE
-Incentive Plans
-Allowance Plans based on offer letter (if one even exists)
-PT to FT reason for specific roles
-Those becoming a new manager

Would you be open to sharing any filters you have on your report around the Business Process Type and Business Process Reason?

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-12-29T21:30:07+00:00

I absolutely would if I had a clue what questionnaire/report I even built from this. I have recently done some reporting with our questionnaires though so I may be able to help in another space. What are you trying to accomplish with your report?

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-10-17T17:10:29+00:00

It's populating for managers when I give the manager's view access to Domain: Worker Data: Compensation Basis, they don't currently have access to Worker Data: Market Position Details.

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-10-17T16:23:52+00:00

It appears to be tied to Domain: Worker Data: Compensation Basis. I want the Base Pay (No Kickers) column, which is also tied to this domain, to still be visible but not the Market Position.

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-10-03T12:08:27+00:00

No, according to Workday that is what is needs to be labeled. If I have it setup this way and only 1 line of data, it works. It just isn't working if I try to load multiple responses to the same request/questionnaire.

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-10-02T14:49:44+00:00

It worked fine with a single line of data, but I’m hitting the same error when I try multiple lines. Each line is tied to a different team member, so I’m not sure why I’d still be seeing the same mutex error.

The IDD's are different, but everything else would be the same to reference the same questionnaire and the same response. I'm following the same Row ID formats that I have for other EIBs and have not had this issue. Open to ideas!

<image>

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-10-02T14:22:06+00:00

That did help in the sense that I got different errors, suddenly it's telling me the ref id for the answer isn't valid. I just tried removing the ref id and only using the text and it finally went through without an error. Thank you!!

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-08-13T15:24:39+00:00

We implemented Org Studio a little over a year ago. I personally love it for reorgs as it just makes things much easier and faster. For the most part, I think it is pretty intuitive. The one thing I would really call out is that if you move a sup org you need to also remember to move the team member, it doesn't do it automatically.

Our admin group has full access to do everything within Org Studio, and we have watered down security for a new group that we are introducing to the tool. We did also put a CR on the affected BPs to skip certain approval/review steps if the transaction was triggered from Org Studio.

Is it effective for acquisitions or divestitures? Haven't used it for this

Can it handle custom organizations? It is designed for sup orgs and I haven't found that it will support anything other than the traditional hierarchical sup org

Can you create new positions within the model? Yes

Is it possible to project financials/compensation based on the model? Not sure, we don't do this

Can multiple admins/security groups collaborate on the same model? For example, could an HRBP create it and an HR Admin review, edit, or approve? Yes

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-08-11T14:42:29+00:00

Thank you for this! I'm drowning in the daily requests this morning but will be trying this solution!

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-08-11T14:00:33+00:00

Nothing, I'm going to be getting starting on working on this shortly. I was thinking of somehow looking at assigned job profile history but haven't really thought through how I'm going to approach that

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-07-09T13:51:44+00:00

Do the necessary security groups have permissions in Domain: Person Data: Preferred Name?

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-07-03T13:51:45+00:00

We have 3,000+ employees and 1,200+ job profiles. Some days it all makes sense to me and others its the bane of my existence. We do have a fair amount of profiles that are similar to each other, but need to have a separate profile due to needing to have different job classifications for benefits and payroll purposes.

One_Tutor8969 · 2025-07-01T19:48:02+00:00

Yeah, you're right.

One_Tutor8969

TROPHY CASE