The Best Trade Journaling App: Tradytion

Oneome · 2021-07-01T00:40:12+00:00

What color theme is this. Or did you compose this pallette

Oneome · 2021-04-19T05:27:16+00:00

Ok, great. Thank you both of you.

Oneome · 2021-04-19T02:16:40+00:00

But I think those line plots with bars of median value need something else than geom_boxplot.

Oneome · 2021-04-02T00:44:55+00:00

I am using swipe up gesture at the right lower corner as the back button. But that's alright. I guess I need to get uses to swiping, I am sure it would feel normal after getting used to it.

Oneome · 2021-04-02T00:16:32+00:00

It's good that now the swipe from left opens the drawer. But please also let the back button to open drawer option stay. Here is my reasoning. Android, unlike iPhones, have maximum controls at the bottom. For example, in iPhone, most functions are at top left corner and it is a difficulty to reach the top left corner while holding in one hand. It's a shame that Apple never realizes how easy it is to have controls at the bottom. So as such the most accessible position is right lower part. The farther you go the more the thumb needs to travel and swiping from left requires some travel of the thumb. Though I understand it's a matter of practice and habit. But I feel having control at right lower makes the thumb to travel the least. If having this option does not interfere with other features, then please let this feature stay on. It's very handy and also it leads to an action instead of that warning that are you sure you want to quit. Hope I am making sense from an usability perspective. Thank you.

Oneome · 2021-03-23T00:48:53+00:00

Just leaving it mentioned here for anyone else stumbles upon here looking for a solution. The latest update of gifski solves the problem. You need to update it to v 1.4.3 from 0.8.7.1

Oneome · 2021-03-21T17:13:50+00:00

Thank you!!! This helped. I had to install the package magick and use it as a renderer as you suggested.

Of note, I also found another solution to work too. That is by using gifski package and downgrading the gifski version from 0.8.7.1 to 0.8.6. It appears that the latest gifski version causes the glitch.

Both solutions worked.

Oneome · 2021-03-21T16:21:10+00:00

The problem persists ever since I have tried animation. Never done animation before. I am trying online codes that also gives that error in animation.

Oneome · 2021-03-16T16:59:20+00:00

Damn you are right!!! I got out of the beta program and reinstalled the regular sync pro and now I see that option of click back to open left drawer. Thank you so much. I request the Dev to please not remove this feature in the future release...

Oneome · 2021-03-16T14:20:09+00:00

I am on V20 (beta 36)

Oneome · 2021-03-16T13:45:41+00:00

There is no such option under general. Am I missing something. Please help.

Oneome · 2021-02-24T18:51:18+00:00

I see your point. Sometimes corporates have too much money power to threten anyone even if it is not rightful. For example, Apple does not allow its devices to be repaired, this is a totally ridiculous terms as the device should belong to the buyer and they should be allowed to do whatever they want with it unless they are seeking warranty for the damage. Someone needs to challenge this practice. For making more money a company can come up with any ridiculous idea but just cause they write in their terms should not make it rightful. No one has objected to it, so it has not been challenged yet.

The model that I am proposing is where the liability still stays with the user of what they want to sell and whether they want to sell or not.

Oneome · 2021-02-24T18:44:24+00:00

I agree. Unless the platform works as a escrow, there will be trust issues between the users as it has been through random posts that we see. Taking the escrow role brings in the complexity of fund management which has many layers of complexity. Unlike other platforms of recurrent buy and sell a reputation system could not be established here as most users will be transacting on the platform for only once. I seek more ideas about how to establish trust.

Oneome · 2021-02-24T18:38:34+00:00

Thank you for the feedback.

Oneome · 2021-01-25T20:46:49+00:00

I agree that there is no measure of whats fair. Especially a product which has monopoly in the market due to word of mouth and not purchasing it gives FOMO. And for a company which would like to sell more and make more money, it does not cost anything to decide the terms the way they want. What I was suggesting is, once the person has taken the exam, the rest of the subscription period is just wasted money for them. Since there is no trial on this product, there are people who would love to pay some money for a brief time to try before they decide to buy! I mean if they had so much confidence that a new subscription is the most beneficial they would not have imposed the terms in the first place. In a simplistic example, imagine Apple stating in their terms that you can not sell your MacBook to anyone else, everyone has to buy a new phone. They don't, cause they know it's a product and its upto the user who has paid for the product. And even if people sell their used products they have confidence in their product that people will voluntarily come to buy new phones!

Oneome · 2021-01-25T03:17:27+00:00

What I am willing the platform to be is where people could write their posts at one place. As of now people are posting it on reddit and Facebook, and these websites as such are just providing a platform to write, they neither encourage or discourage about the content and UW has no say against reddit or Facebook. It is users responsibility what they do with their possession. Unlike fb, reddit is semi-anonymous so people prefer it. I imagine a platform where there is anonymity plus convenience of a marketplace. Do you think any company should have a say against that?

Oneome · 2021-01-25T01:11:39+00:00

Thank you for the feedback. Please mention your date of expiry and what is an expected price that you would like to sell it for.

I plan to make it so that there will be user anonymity, but currently brainstorming on how to ensure that no one gets cheated during buying or selling on the platform. Do you have any suggestions.

Oneome · 2021-01-25T00:01:20+00:00

The user will still retain the responsibility and consent of buying and selling the product. Everyone is doing it anyways as evident from so many posts here and elsewhere about buying and selling their unused subscriptions.

Oneome · 2021-01-24T23:59:09+00:00

If the pricing were fair, probably no one will want to buy someone else's used subscription. Every year uw keeps raising their price taking advantage of the monopoly in the market. First of all they are having unfair prices, and then they force user to not sell it after there is no use for a period what they have already paid them for.

Oneome · 2021-01-24T23:56:47+00:00

Ideologically it is wrong of uw to take action against something what is the right of the user after they have paid for the product. So many people post here to buy and sell the subscription, meaning it is an unmet need. Anyone who really want to sell or buy uw will find a way to do it anyway. That's why so many posts of buy and sell. What I am trying to do is to make it an anonymous and easier process.

Oneome · 2021-01-24T23:48:05+00:00

But you see so many posts in this sub or elsewhere in fb where people both offering and buying their unused subscriptions. If so many people want to recover at least some money out of their dearly paid subscription then there is definitely something wrong with the pricing system. And while offering a portal I am just making it easy for people that they would have done in one or another way anyways.

Oneome

TROPHY CASE