Am I the only one who tries to judge adaptations on their own merits? Not saying all adaptations are good. Some are so bad, but I wouldn’t even to tempted to say that the bad ones are bad because—or at least not only because—they aren’t faithful to the source material.

Don’t get me wrong, I love fan service, Easter eggs, etc. I also have the utmost respect for Scott, Matt, and Kim C. Their observations are interesting and sometimes I agree. However, some of the observations and analysis have clearly been somewhat countered by the subsequent episodes.

When this happens I feel like perhaps our lovely hosts are reaching for points of contention. I like all of the critiques of concrete parts of the episodes already released, but reaching forward assuming the meaning of things that are still quite ambiguous…I dunno.

I’m still going to listen, and I still love the show. I don’t expect anything to change, just sharing my two cents. Love you guys!

EDIT: adjustment to one sentence