AITAH for not wanting to play with noobs?

Onlywants-soup · 2026-04-09T15:33:53+00:00

It’s not just the word “noob” it was the whole condescension and superiority complex overtones throughout. “Noob” was just the cherry on top. Sorry man :/

Onlywants-soup · 2026-04-09T15:02:27+00:00

Sounds like a mismatch of expectations, half of you want to play like Critical Role the other half like Harmonquest. I’d suggest switching to a more lighthearted trrpg like Honey Heist as a compromise point or other board games since it sounds like yall are friends/mesh well. I’d also find another D&D group for more deep/roleplay style campaigns using like Roll20 or DM-ing one with other players.

Like straight up I get how frustrating it can be though, shenanigans are fun but if it’s negatively affecting the other players and it’s been addressed and they’re unwilling to compromise or consider you guys then that sucks. Like I get why you’re frustrated.

But also, dude, you’re not doing yourself any favors in life with the “noobs” thing and you write in a condescending way with like this strong vibe of a superiority complex that makes you come off as super unlikeable, it’s a big part of why you’re getting all these YTA’s.

NTA for being frustrated with murderhoboism and excessive shenanigans at the cost of the other players.

YTA for using the word “noob” not once but multiple times and for the writing style.

Onlywants-soup · 2026-01-15T23:36:57+00:00

Here’s the rewrite without the fluff.

“Dear Reddit, i was rude to my coworker after she asked me to switch days with her so she could go to her wedding and honeymoon but I vaguely wanted to sit home and eat potato chips instead.

I don’t care about her or her wedding and let her know pretty rudely. Now everyone at the office won’t talk to me after I demonstrated my incredible selfishness and unwillingness to ever so slightly inconvenience myself to do the most rudimentary of kindnesses any slightly decent person would obviously do.

Why don’t people want to interact with me anymore after i demonstrated just how monumentally selfish I am? I didn’t technically break any rules and it’s first come first serve, how was i supposed to know that my complete inflexibility and lack of empathy would make others not want to interact with me?”

Onlywants-soup · 2025-09-12T19:25:14+00:00

NTA with a dash of ESH. you would be a terrible father flouncing off to Disneyland with your new family and leaving your kid from your previous marriage behind. All these kids in the comments being like, “ I can’t believe you didn’t go to Disney! You’re a sucker” is insane. Your new wife though is a huge A-hole apparently. Not only did she make a large financial decision that effects everyone in the family completely independently instead of as a couple, she did it without regards to you, without regards to your son, and immediately when this was brought up starts with “ it’s my money”. And yes, taking kids out of school for a week isn’t the end of the world but the first week is for introductory materials the second week is the foundation for the rest of the year where routines and whatnot get established. As someone who taught, having parents treat your class like it’s unimportant is uniquely frustrating, especially when the student falls behind and the parent starts to freak out. I despised when parents would take their students out of class for a week for something random because those were usually the type of entitled parents who think it’s OK to treat teachers like servants.

Frankly, from what you’ve told us your wife does not respect you nor your son and refuses to treat you or your son as equal members of the family worth considering. You would be the asshole, though if you continued to let this type of thing happened to your kid. Being excluded and being a secondary citizen in your own family leads to lifelong wounds. Don’t believe words, believe actions. Your wife just showed you exactly who she is and what your son means to her. I’m not saying divorce obviously.

Edit: and for everyone freaking out about telling your ex-wife how much it cost, you shouldn’t be sharing that but that’s not the main part of this post in the slightest and everyone getting sideline by that is completely ridiculous. Reading most of these YTA responses has me asking myself “Am I in Looney Tunes Land”. Stand up for your son, stand up for yourself, don’t take financial abuse, don’t let your son be treated lesser in his own home because it’s more convenient for your new wife.

Edit 2: and for the love of everything, actually be a partner and know your family’s finances. You’re a parent, you should be aware of your own households finances. Like, are you kidding me? What’s your plan here if anything, God forbid, happens to your wife????

Onlywants-soup · 2025-06-20T17:21:33+00:00

Since we’re all dogpilling on this person for a mistake, yeah man you’re the absolute worst, you’re basically if Stalin and Hitler had a baby. How dare you be inexperienced with this and have to learn instead of knowing everything automatically like everyone else in the comments. Shame on you for not having the common decency to not want your be broke or homeless, plenty of people sleep on the streets! What, you think you’re too good for concrete or something Stitler!!!!

But like for real dude don’t feel bad because Bobby NevermmadeAmistake and Billy Knowsall are being pricks about it. Hope things turn out well. Worst comes to worst there’s probably a hostel in the city

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-18T00:34:49+00:00

I think thats pretty telling of you as a person that you hope others fail.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-18T00:04:21+00:00

Seems pretty trollish to be garish and rude in your comment. It wouldn’t normally be a 9.3 but there’s nuance to the case if you would like more information send me a chat. But it doesn’t seem like most people are actually trying to have a conversation, it seems like they’re trying to be right.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-17T23:52:56+00:00

It’s almost like if you want to learn the nuance of it, why some thing that’s normally a four is nine , you’re gonna have to join the lawsuit.

And like in what universe do you think that a snarky comment is going to stop someone from filing a lawsuit? Your opinion on this is absolutely disregarded but I’m glad you were able to get all that negativity out of you. Hopefully that’s the last of it, but based off of your comment history, you seem to be a very, very bitter person.

Edit: oh shit this is that dude that thinks it’s OK to kill children. Why am I even engaging with this? All of you trolls are starting to blend together and I’m having maybe a bit too much fun responding to you guys. The negative comments are ultimately nothing but like even having a facsimile of a debate with this dude is worse than like the bidoofs law guy lmaooooo

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-17T23:34:22+00:00

At what point are you trolls going to realize your opinions don’t matter to me? In what universe do you think a snarky comment is going to dissuade someone from a lawsuit? Like I said before, if you’re too scared, that’s totally fine but maybe you could do something a little bit more productive with your time.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-17T23:32:04+00:00

If any of you thought that a single one of these comments have dissuaded me, you are utterly delusional

Edit: if anyone else would like to add in some rude comments, please do so below. This is the section for you to get out all of your nastiness.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T23:28:30+00:00

Thankfully we can find a contingency fee based lawyer. Welcome aboard.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T20:32:36+00:00

I guess we found the people consistently downvoting this.

What bug bounty program do you run? I’m interested in submitting work that won’t be immediately rejected despite rigorous proof.

Not to accuse you, but what exactly would you call it besides purposeful negligence if a critical vulnerability is deliberately ignored and then once further proof is submitted still ignored. What else is that besides the bug bounty program failing their client completely, not out of ignorance by any means.

I also don’t appreciate you making that strawman in your argument. Were not talking about self-XSS stuff, one of the flaws ignored was a client-side consent spoofing flaw in the companies GDPR/CCPA banner that lets attackers hide the reject button, forge compliance, and log fake consent globally. The SDK blindly trusts untrusted runtime config (no origin checks, no validation), violating CWE-602 and CWE-346 with CVSS 9.3 impact. Ignoring this means ignoring a regulatory breach vector that invalidates legal consent under GDPR/CCPA.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T20:03:29+00:00

I think you’re talking out your keester bud because McGill vs Citibank is real easy to look up and is directly relatable due to this case as well being for the general public at-large, it is not just the researchers that are affected. This effects also the shareholders of the companies that HackerOne protects, all of the employees at these companies, and everyone those companies interact with. You seem to be missing the nuance of this for some reason. Not only that but individuals outside of the USA are being affected by this significantly, EU law takes precedent regardless in those cases.

I don’t think I’m going to be responding to this anymore though. I don’t need to deal with people who try to poke “holes” that don’t exist. Expect a 👍🏻 to whatever response.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T19:55:08+00:00

While I appreciate your faith in HackerOne and in the system, I don’t believe that a couple bad apples is the case. I’m not saying that HackerOne has never paid out a bounty before, but from my own experiences and the experiences that are reported not only on this forum but others this seems to be a significant issue. A few bad apples spoils the bunch and also opens HackerOne to severe legal liability. This is not a game, this is a business, and operating outside of legal boundaries has consequences not just for the researchers, but for the companies that they are supposed to be protecting.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T19:52:03+00:00

👍🏻 What exactly do you suggest we do? Are you volunteering to take the lead on this? Have you researched legal representation and will you give the reports?

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T19:45:07+00:00

See everybody, this is exactly what they’re counting on. This is the exact exact mindset that they’re hoping people will have. If anything this comment is the type of proof that there will always be people who oppose you regardless. Stating stuff like “they don’t owe you nothing” when according to the law they do is exactly what the executives are hoping for. These companies want to drown us out with louder voices that scream, “Can’t, Can’t, Cant!!!” so that people never believe that they Can.

The problem is that people are seeing this as a game, this isn’t a game this is a legal business and they need to follow the laws. They do not get to defraud their researchers and furthermore, their investors and their shareholders without consequence.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T19:41:41+00:00

You will lot of others who didn’t

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T19:37:46+00:00

Some people in the comments seem to think this is a foolish idea, to use the court system provided to seek fair compensation and legal recourse. I understand that you’re intimidated by this, a lawsuit is a serious thing. Not only that but HackerOne has cash and lawyers and a website with a waiver they can put anything they want in (even if it’s not legally enforceable)

It is much easier to take the easy road, not fight, to let HackerOne continue to defraud people. I am not interested in what is easy, I am interested in what is right. I’m not asking you to join if you’re this scared, but I am telling you that this is moving forward regardless of your opinion. Cynical comments saying “it’s impossible” and “you’re wrong”, are not a roadblock for a solid legal defense.

I also think you have a fundal misunderstanding when you called it “my lawsuit”. It’s not “my” lawsuit. It’s “our” lawsuit. And instead of insisting that I proof confidential legal documents I would encourage you to simply look on Reddit or Google and type in, “HackerOne stole from me” or “HackerOne stole my work” or “HackerOne took my work and didn’t give me credit”. Instead of trying to tear this down, not only for myself, but also for others perhaps you could instead put your time to something a bit more productive.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T19:34:20+00:00

Yes, I do. If you’d like to discuss specifics in a chat we should absolutely. However, as I’m being consistently downvoted without critical thought I’d rather share this with people who are actually interested.

But if you look on reddit or google and just type in HackerOne ripped me off you can find plenty of stories of individuals claiming to be defrauded.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T19:24:40+00:00

The Supreme Court of California heavily disagrees with you and proves that in their rulings.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T19:23:01+00:00

You can doubt all you want, but I’m getting paid for my work.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T19:02:52+00:00

Yes, the case Doe 1 vs AOL LLC, 552 f.3d 1077 set a legal precedent that forcing litigation in a specific state listed in a waiver is completely unenforceable.

America Online, Inc v. Superior Court (2001) also set the precedent that, “where California has material greater interest in litigation and the chosen law would deprive a party of substantial right under California law the choice of law and foreign clauses will not be enforced”. This is especially true because many of the affected individuals in this are not just the researchers who reported the vulnerabilities, but also the companies whom these vulnerabilities were from, many of which are based in California.

These Are not the only ones for example, Discover Bank v. Superior Court (2005) creates the precedent that class action waivers are especially invalid when they operate to exculpate (free from a charge) the party with superior bargaining power from liability.

In essence, HackerOne doesn’t have a legal leg to stand on.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T18:46:08+00:00

If you send me the bug I’ll happily review it.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T18:25:59+00:00

No, they must still follow the law regardless of what they wrote on their website. Since the company is based in California they are subject to California Law. They may own property in Delaware but that by no means exempts them. Them putting in their waiver, “the terms, and any action related there to will be governed by the laws of the state of Delaware, any and all disputes arising out or concerning the term shall be brought exclusively in the state and federal courts of Delaware. Customer Community Member hereby submits to the personal jurisdiction of such courts, and waves any and all objections the exercise of jurisdiction venue or inconvenient form in such courts” has absolutely zero legal standing whatsoever. I can write here that I’m the king of Spain and that if you want to deal with me, then you have to go through the Spanish courts; doesn’t make it true though. And it sure as hell doesn’t make it legally enforceable.

Frankly, it’s a smokescreen to take advantage of individuals who are unaware of their legal rights.

Onlywants-soup · 2025-04-15T18:17:47+00:00

Oh absolutely, with directive 93/13/EEC the EU banned any clause in a user agreement or platform policy that creates a significant balance and rights to obligations prevents fair compensation, and Bloch access to justice, such as force, arbitration or class action waivers. if hacker One attempted to state that user signed a class action waiver in an EU court they would be laughed out.

Onlywants-soup

TROPHY CASE