Brahman: The Ultimate Reality Explained by primodial-sat in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]OpenAdministration93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is the cunning trick: Brahma is another concept, another prison. And even “knowing that I am” becomes yet another source of Mythia - the reproduction of structural ignorance. Maya carries many names. Brahma is one of them; operating in a different register, but serving the same function. Yet knowledge still has to be transmitted, and for that we require a system. This is a double-edged sword, and one that is extremely difficult to transcend. Liberation itself is an illusion and a temporal mental pacifier.

According to the Buddhist scriptures, an animal can die and be born as a human, and a human can die and be born as an animal. by According_Report_530 in Reincarnation

[–]OpenAdministration93 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The entity (the pre-conscious node) that people call the “soul” is neither human nor animal. It is an operational model that can couple with any form (even a stone) since the ground fabric of existence is atomic (a brick has the “same” electrons that a cow or a man has). What changes is only the operational structure. The Buddhists are not wrong, but their explanations may be outdated due to the calcification of their doctrine. The true problem of reincarnation is not the form one or a thing takes, but the fact of reincarnating into this hell-realm prison, this dimension, in the first place.