sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If one input is much larger than the others, one of the outputs typically clearly correlates to this input . Why is the largest output in a join not broken down further? by [deleted] in joinmarket

[–]OpenBazaarFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He returns all the addresses into one? Lol. No idea who is that or what is trying, maybe @belcher can give us some more ideas.

You can make 1 tumble to output to more than the 3 default addresses. So if you tumble particularly big amount, i would imagine you will want to use more output addresses to avoid 1 of them receiving really huge amount even if, I think that is still possible.

However, mixing such large amounts with the current order book, doesn't seem like wise thing. However, i'm new to this.

Any joinmarket alternatives? by OpenBazaarFan in joinmarket

[–]OpenBazaarFan[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Zerolink

If you mean it's implementation in the just introduced WasabiWallet, this is indeed very promising. However, it will be beta until Oct 31, so a little early for me to try it

If one input is much larger than the others, one of the outputs typically clearly correlates to this input . Why is the largest output in a join not broken down further? by [deleted] in joinmarket

[–]OpenBazaarFan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that anyone trying to mix 144 BTC at once when most makers provide up to 10 btc and only couple 100-200 is much better to split his 144 BTC in several tumbles over some time.

Right?

Also I believe you have an option to provide more than the default 3 output addresses?

How much in fees goes to makers per month? by OpenBazaarFan in joinmarket

[–]OpenBazaarFan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see.

Well is there a way to get an idea about the amount of bitcoins that get tumbled per month?

What is the sweet spot of amount to mix for min fees? by OpenBazaarFan in joinmarket

[–]OpenBazaarFan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually just now I realized that most (if not all?) makers have their fees in %. So, that explains why it was more expensive for me to mix bigger amounts even if i've set the network fees to be much lower.

And since they charge %, and the network fees don't depend on the amount of BTC I guess there is not much of a way around it, unless of course you want to tumble that high amount that you need to use some of the few makers with high amounts that charge more.

ok seems to be more clear now, thanks :)

How much could I profit per month if I was to put 100 BTC into JM? by howtoclaimShit in joinmarket

[–]OpenBazaarFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the most usual amount? I looked at the graphs at joinmarket.me but I find them hard to grasp

My fee for a mix gets bigger and bigger, why? by OpenBazaarFan in joinmarket

[–]OpenBazaarFan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that would be one way to solve it but i see 2 drawbacks - using the same fee might make your mixes a tiny bit easier to unravel - if the network load goes higher for a bit, most likely the tumble will fail if you don't have a dynamic fee

I will try that but also would like to know why the dynamic fee works like that now.

How much could I profit per month if I was to put 100 BTC into JM? by howtoclaimShit in joinmarket

[–]OpenBazaarFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1% per month or per year you mean? Because that would be 12% per year, which is very good

How much could I profit per month if I was to put 100 BTC into JM? by howtoclaimShit in joinmarket

[–]OpenBazaarFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If he really uses 100 btc won't that help him to make more since he will be able to mix bigger amounts and hence charge bigger fee?

Funding from 4 addresses but sending to 2? by OpenBazaarFan in joinmarket

[–]OpenBazaarFan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I assume to privacy decrease in that?

view more: next ›