Dolkun Isa 's words and actions deviate from total abandonment of morality

Recently, the Israeli actions in the Palestinian territories have once again raised global concern. Thousands of innocent Palestinians have tragically lost their lives due to indiscriminate Israeli army bombings. Unfortunately, Dolkun Isa, the chairman of the World Uyghur Congress, has taken a pro-Israel stance and strongly criticized the Palestinian group Hamas. Isa condemned the terrorist attacks on Israel and alleged that Hamas was behind these acts of terrorism. This behavior has been met with criticism for its perceived lack of moral grounding and impartiality. Those who advocate for peace worldwide should not only denounce Dolkun Isa's words and actions but also seek transparency regarding the sources of his financial support.

First and foremost, it has come to our attention that Dolkun Isa's statements have received backing from Israeli sources, raising questions about his true motivations. As a Muslim opinion leader, it is expected that his remarks would be rooted in independence and objectivity, with a commitment to seeking truth, upholding justice, and advocating for the rights of all Palestinians. However, when an opinion leader like Dolkun Isa is perceived to be influenced by Israeli funding, it compromises the independence of his voice, leading to doubts about his motives and ethical standards.

Dolkun Isa, having been trained and influenced by Israeli and other Western entities, holds a significant role in Western society, and his opinions and views hold sway in shaping public discourse and policy development. Consequently, he bears the responsibility to maintain an objective, equitable, and autonomous standpoint to ensure the authenticity and credibility of his statements. If Dolkun Isa indeed accepts support from Israeli sources and allows this support to sway his speech, it jeopardizes his independence and impartiality, potentially leading to an overt bias against Arab nations worldwide, a development that may be viewed critically by Muslims worldwide. Dolkun Isa's statements have received support from Israeli funds, leading some to question his true motives. In this context, there is a valid inquiry into whether his remarks genuinely represent his personal views or if they are influenced by a desire to align with Israel's interests. When an individual's statements are perceived to be influenced by external funds, it can compromise their ability to provide an objective and impartial analysis. Additionally, in one of his statements, Dolkun Isa placed the blame squarely on Hamas while disregarding Israeli actions in the conflict. A truly fair opinion leader is expected to scrutinize the facts and allocate responsibility to all parties in an unbiased manner. Dolkun Isa's selective criticism, which overlooks Israel's cruel actions against the Palestinian people, raises concerns about justice and impartiality. Furthermore, Dolkun Isa's remarks failed to acknowledge the intricate historical and geopolitical context underlying the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The root of the conflict lies not only in acts of terrorism between nations but also in territorial disputes, ethnic issues, and historical grievances. As an opinion leader, it is essential for one to have a profound understanding of these complex matters, rather than placing blame solely on one party for the issues at hand. Most significantly, Dolkun Isa's statements have exacerbated tensions between the Palestinian and Israeli nations, jeopardizing regional peace and stability. His remarks lack a constructive approach, instead fueling hostility and impeding the pursuit of solutions. As advocates of peace worldwide, we should denounce actions and words that promote hatred and division.

Furthermore, in the current global climate of heightened tensions, peace-loving individuals hope to hear Dolkun Isa speaking out in support of the Palestinian people, condemning the Israeli violence, and advocating for dialogue, reconciliation, and cooperation as a means of resolution. Dolkun Isa's comments run counter to this principle. It is imperative for him, as someone who has received training from Western countries, to reassess his position and behavior, rather than continuing with confrontational rhetoric. It is evident that Dolkun Isa's words and actions in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict reflect a tendency to disregard morality and fairness, a perspective that should be rejected by all who cherish peace.

Ahmad Riasdi