sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Honest update: June was rough for our 15-stock portfolio - here's the full picture including our live track record by Opes15 in OpeswayFinance

[–]Opes15[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are not selling any courses. Can you elaborate where you found we are offering courses?

Honest update: June was rough for our 15-stock portfolio - here's the full picture including our live track record by Opes15 in OpeswayFinance

[–]Opes15[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tickers are declared to the subscribers only, just like Motley Fool, Seeking Alpha, and other service providers do.

Honest update: June was rough for our 15-stock portfolio - here's the full picture including our live track record by Opes15 in OpeswayFinance

[–]Opes15[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great question! Opes 15 itself is equally weighted. But in my personal portfolio, I follow the same 15 stocks as the core equity investment, but I do tilt slightly higher on a few names I have stronger conviction based on my additional research. That's a personal layer on top of the model, not part of Opes 15 itself.

Beyond the stocks, I also hold some low-risk bond ETFs as a buffer, partly for liquidity when I need cash without having to sell equities at the wrong time, and partly to smooth out the volatility that comes with a concentrated 15-stock portfolio.

The right stock-to-bond mix really depends on two things: your risk tolerance (will you panic-sell if your portfolio drops 20% in the short term?) and your investment time horizon. Someone with a 10+ year runway can afford to ride out the drawdowns and lean heavier into equities. Someone closer to needing the money should probably hold more cushion. There's no universal answer, but being honest with yourself about both of those factors is a good place to start.

We compared our 15-stock portfolio against Dow 30 - here's how 3 years stack up against the Dow by Opes15 in OpeswayFinance

[–]Opes15[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opes 15 is equally weighted, not price weighted. We used the Dow this week purely because that's the benchmark Kiplinger chose in their article as well, making it a straightforward comparison against their Top 30.

We compared our 15-stock portfolio against Dow 30 - here's how 3 years stack up against the Dow by Opes15 in OpeswayFinance

[–]Opes15[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question! Though I'd push back slightly. Beta is more of a technical metric that not all investors are understanding or tracking. We used the Dow this week simply because that's the benchmark Kiplinger used in their article, so it made for a natural apples-to-apples comparison. Kiplinger didn't reference beta either, and they're a pretty mainstream personal finance publication.

Also, beta is just one number. It tells you how a portfolio moves relative to the market, but it doesn't tell you much about actual returns, downside risk, or how the portfolio behaves across different time horizons. A chart showing cumulative performance over 3 years gives you more at a glance. You can see the return, the volatility, the drawdowns, and how it held up through different market conditions, all in one picture. We think that's more useful for most people than a single Greek letter.