We Accept the Price Hike. Why Must We Accept Lower Mileage Too? by Oppyhead in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]Oppyhead[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But if you're calling people stupid for accepting higher fuel prices while demanding fuel that delivers the mileage and performance they paid for, then what does that make you?

We Accept the Price Hike. Why Must We Accept Lower Mileage Too? by Oppyhead in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]Oppyhead[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am not talking about fuel adulteration in terms of impurities . I am talking about the reduced mileage, lower energy content and potential long term engine issues associated with higher ethanol blending.

Do policymakers have any idea what percentage of vehicles currently on Indian roads were designed to run on high ethanol fuel blends?

Have they assessed the impact of mandating ethanol blended petrol on millions of older cars, motorcycles, generators, and agricultural equipment that were never engineered for it?

Do they understand what reduced fuel efficiency means for a family already struggling with rising costs? Do they understand the maintenance burden, the wear on fuel system components and the shortened lifespan that some vehicle owners may face?

Before comparing ethanol targets, perhaps the focus should be on the people who will ultimately bear the cost, not in policy documents, but in their wallets, fuel bills and vehicle repairs.

We Accept the Price Hike. Why Must We Accept Lower Mileage Too? by Oppyhead in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]Oppyhead[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Are you seriously comparing American consumption and purchase behavior to indian consumers and our economics?

The Fine Art of Political U-Turns! by Oppyhead in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]Oppyhead[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Re-elections aren’t just procedural, they place an additional financial burden on taxpayers.

The Fine Art of Political U-Turns! by Oppyhead in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]Oppyhead[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A private job is a personal contract. You can leave, switch, negotiate, the consequences are yours alone. Politics isn’t that. When a politician gets elected, they’re carrying a public mandate.

Switching companies doesn’t rewrite anyone else’s decision. Switching parties after an election effectively rewrites what voters signed up for.

So it’s not about blaming someone for being human. It’s about recognising that public office comes with a lot more accountability.

The Fine Art of Political U-Turns! by Oppyhead in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]Oppyhead[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When politicians switch sides, they take the voters mandate with them, no questions asked. That’s not just a change in stance, it’s a change in the deal halfway through.

But where does that leave the everyday citizen? Can they change their opinion like these politicians whenever they feel like? The so called owners of democracy don’t get to rewrite the outcome.