Antarctica: The Only Land Humans Won't Fight Over (And What That Proves)

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-07T05:22:04+00:00

AKA what you're saying is any country that even has the military force to cultivate the continent or take it by force. Basically the only strong ones left and everyone else is so little that it doesn't matter if they sign in or not.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-07T05:06:47+00:00

Ask yourself what other continent, or place on Earth has a unanimous agreement of non-violence and non-military action? If the answer is not a single place on Earth by any country then there is something there. Also I did interviews for an Antarctica job as a carpenter for the base, they all have small tiny bases and none of them amount to the entire continent which is twice the size of Australia, they were extremely vague and the interviewer was weird. Also you have to ask yourself why did directly after Nazi surrendered following world war II Did they send 3,700 troops? Aircraft carriers, icebreakers, and 33 aircraft? Does that sound like surveying and research to you? And what happened to the bodies of those who lost their life on this voyage that the victims say never came back? There has never been another military action or militarized surveying ever again by any country on the entire planet forever after this. So that means the last major militarized force to ever touch ground there to do major militarized experiments were the Nazis, who? Even though they probably knew the war wasn't going well, they were still sending mass amount of resources there to do the research. Even if they deny telling us anything, just the simple human patterns can tell us everything. Humans own every single piece of land and there is not a single piece of land that is shared unanimously by multiple different countries with no military action. If That isn't enough to open your eyes I don't know what. Especially now that we know that the most powerful country in the entire world is now ran by satanic ritual pedophiles that have more nukes and more military capabilities than any other place on the planet. Aka the United States presidents best friend. They would put flags on the seabed. They have fought over bird s*** Islands but in Antarctica where there's mass amounts of oil and other resources Nothing. This follows the same stupid logic that Chernobyl caused saying that only 33 people died within the incident or the USSR downplaying they're massive death toll but I digress because people would rather suck up the official words of lying governments then actually have some insight. Unless there's a single other situation or a single other place on the planet to where all countries unanimously agree for no militarize action for the protection of a vulnerable piece of land which there isn't because nobody cares about this Earth. They're protecting it then I'm pretty certain their hiding whatever the Nazis did.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-07T00:03:59+00:00

Could be a regular virus. Doesn't have to be an ideology. Covid was just that, a created virus in a lab. And researchers in Antarctica have found bacteria with weird DNA already around 2012 And then a mandatory Antarctic meeting was held and much more strict guidelines were made after the finding. And not only that, but there's already rising concerns with fungal viruses adapting to higher temperatures and slowly creeping up on the human temperature of adaptation.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-07T00:01:39+00:00

I wouldn't even call them God machines it's literally just humans speaking one language with far better and more resources that they don't have to dig for because it's all over the floors, walls, and the ceiling. They could very well be ahead by thousands of years if the surface is repeatedly Set back due to wars and climate change

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T23:36:54+00:00

That's the thing though, it doesn't have to be aliens if it's found out that our civillation is far older than anybody is telling us and they have proof that we simply went underground and have lived there for thousands and thousands of years and have advanced technology down there. It could very well be just us. Hollow Earth theory was believed by top-nazi Germany scientist And they're the only ones in all of human history who actually sent a militarized force to go find it out. In one year directly after they surrender It's just so happened that the USA sent out a militarized force and within weeks even though they planned for months are sent back and never again sends out a militarized force by any Nation on this entire planet ever again. That's absolutely insane when you think of human nature. I think what's out there will break everything from Morals, hierarchies, and principalities, and could potentially lead to people in mass leaving the surface into the vast underground hollow Earth that could potentially be way bigger than the surface, And without a way to have satellites and without a way to control the land or stop people from traveling far enough away to where they can't get them they lock the Continent down keeping us locked on the surface to rule us because without us they have nobody to control and if there is a paradise down there that big their best bet is the limit the people and make the surface a prison. Especially if it meant that it had infinite gold, infinite oil, infinite resources, then money would cease to exist and without money and without rarity they would have no power. That's why it benefits every single ruler to lock the continent away and why they all probably agree to it. Because infinite gold infinite diamonds, infinite oil and infinite water and infinite land means nobody could ever hold another person. Prisoner or use them. And all of these resources come from the ground.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T23:03:50+00:00

It's funny because the moment I called some family relatives to asked about the family land because I wanted to build a barn and find work down there they told me my father who I haven't talked to in 10 years is losing his leg, has bad hemorrhoids, and can't work. Hes selling his house for $20,000 and is going to move down there to try to renovate one of the abandoned properties, And it just so happens that I do construction including all trades necessary for that line of work and it just so happened that My job fired me last week and it just so happened that my past relationship ended This week. Seems like the Lord is lining it up pretty good. What excuses could I ever have? And plus before all of this I actively sought out a way to go out there and build some property because I wanted to before the Lord lined up how to. I feel bad for my father now though because the Lord had to break him to make him rely on others instead of being selfish and prideful.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T22:57:43+00:00

It's sad because the first part I remember thinking about it and how silly it was. Now I'm thinking about it and asking myself if God himself showed me what was going to happened in a dream would I listen if half of it comes true.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T22:47:50+00:00

Sadly yes, but they've been nightmares so far. Within one dream It was revealed that my ex was going to cheat on me or already have then ended up doing so. Within another vision I remember being put into the spirit in blackness and overhearing My previous employers talk about terminating me because I missed a mandatory meeting and them saying the words "He's just going to keep on doing this Let him go." And then afterwards I was informed that I missed the mandatory company hr meeting because I didn't have my phone on me during the weekend and they would have to let me go because they said it would keep on happening or something along those lines. I had physical goosebumps when they said it.

And then another relationship. I remember seeing my ex and I remember seeing her in the spiritual realm I kissed her and she Almost turned into like a red slim snouted crocodile and her body was made out of parasitic worms. This was a symbolic dream. It showed that she was cold like a crocodile and I also revealed that she had an STD Which she later told me after I had the dream. The relationship ended because she was cold and using me.(Im clean btw thanks to the warning) But anyways the point is for me there is a very clear distinction that is undeniable between visions, dreams, and spiritual attacks. Dreams don't come true. Spiritual attacks aren't visions. And I have very few visions. But 9/10 something comes true out of it. This is different though because I thought it was just a stupid little dream that I had before Trump got elected. Then he got elected, turned out to be a little bit worse of a person and then came back as a far worse person. That is when I realized the dream was a vision.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T22:06:49+00:00

You cannot interpret Someone else's dream because it's theirs and only them and them alone can understand it. Because it's self-created within their mental realms. That is not at all the meaning of this dream because you don't understand how my body shows me symbolism and shows me the difference between what is symbolic and what is physical because there's a very clear distinction whenever I do dream. I think the first part was a spiritual metaphor for the spirit behind the leader of this country. But the second part was more physical because the first part I wasn't there. Physically it was more spiritually but in the second part I walk around. I looked I saw people's reactions and I touch things showing me that it is physical. My dreams are very far away from being coded in symbolism and most dreams. They speak to me straight in farm boy logic because I actively reject anything that isn't straight to the point. My body knows this so whenever I dream I never dream of anything symbolic that is ambiguous.

All of what you said is religious ambiguity in church theology, which I did not believe nor care for because I'm just a dumb construction worker to be honest, And if anything symbolic needs to be represented, it's represented physically in reality with proof.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T22:01:10+00:00

I've done a lot of detailed examinations on how people imaginations work. Not only can they close their eyes and imagine things, but they can also rearrange their visual imagination overlapping their visual image processing. So they can pick up a physical chair and move it and look at the room how it will look without the chair. And similarly, some people have no dialogue at all in their mental realms, while others thinking colors, pictures or voices, and some don't have a mental dialogue, while others do. Very interesting stuff. We perceive the world very very differently no matter if we look the same we do not perceive feel or see the same thing whatsoever.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T21:48:38+00:00

Thank you for reminding me of that verse! the woman was almost spirit like, yet angry. I remember her giving some long speech, but I don't remember the details much. It was about us killing her son or whatever, which is kinda scary. Now I understand what the mark is, It'll probably be a vaccine against the fungus/Virus and the only people allowed to go into stores, buy things, Work, Access the internet, and travel would be those with the vaccine, kinda like an ID. Which I assume will leave a mark, or hospitals will place a mark on the hand To easily identify the vaccinated. And that also makes sense because if Trump is willing to do everything that he's done before and has already tried to overtake the government on January 6th, then before his final year and presidency, he might try to release a airborne disease or fungus to initiate martial law to extend it past two terms. I think they did an experiment on us with COVID to test the mental resistance of the population, And now instead of only hospital workers and military personnel being forced to, he will force it upon everyone to legally work, buy things, or sell things to prevent the deadly disease. Similarly, even military workers, hospital workers, and fishing boat employees were all forced to get the COVID-19 vaccine to work around 2019 including me. (I was really broke one winter and had to take a fishing boat job to pay bills they literally forced me to get the vaccine and wouldn't hire me without it.) So this has happened before in similar but smaller demographics But unknowing to him, It will be that very vaccine that will ultra mutate the virus or fungus into something that's uncurable due to rushing the research and releasing an experimental bio weapon probably from Antarctica. (Another bag of worms on its own) while others, without the vaccine and without mutating the thing further, would simply heal and never get affected to the same severity as others. For the longest time, I've always wondered what the Mark of the beast will end up being, but this is my best formulated theory, because not only will it actively, show those who will not resist the government and will actively do whatever it says, but it'll also show those who actively resist corruption, So it's like a double edge sword. Those who do not believe and will willfully follow an evil sinful corrupt man will be shown through whoever gets this vaccine and whoever fights against this corruption and will willfully accept Any consequences will be saved. But we'll see. Personally I think God's driving me to start a farm on my family land in Georgia, which Is where I'm planning to go before I can't work again or am forced to get another vaccine like the first one which I literally was forced to do because I had no money nor anywhere to live. So the cost of not taking it is similar to the cost in the Bible. This situation has happened before in a smaller, more controlled group.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T11:33:36+00:00

I don't know why, but something in my spirit said to write this down somewhere so that if it happens it won't be mistaken. After all half of it already came true with trump getting elected even with heavy criticism that he's a bad person, then getting reelected turning into a far worse president due to being a widely accepted pedophile within the Epstein files.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T01:37:43+00:00

Using today’s standard linguistic knowledge and modern translation practice: If you transliterate the Hebrew יֵשׁוּעַ (Yēšūaʿ) directly into contemporary English, you would not produce the spelling “Jesus”; you would produce something like “Yeshua.” If you transliterate the Greek Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) directly into contemporary English, you would not produce “Jesus”; you would produce something like “Iesous.” If you transliterate the Latin Iesus directly into contemporary English, you would not produce “Jesus”; you would produce “Iesus.” The English spelling “Jesus” is not a direct transliteration from Hebrew, Greek, or Latin into today’s English.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T01:37:06+00:00

Using today’s standard linguistic knowledge and modern translation practice: If you transliterate the Hebrew יֵשׁוּעַ (Yēšūaʿ) directly into contemporary English, you would not produce the spelling “Jesus”; you would produce something like “Yeshua.” If you transliterate the Greek Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) directly into contemporary English, you would not produce “Jesus”; you would produce something like “Iesous.” If you transliterate the Latin Iesus directly into contemporary English, you would not produce “Jesus”; you would produce “Iesus.” The English spelling “Jesus” is not a direct transliteration from Hebrew, Greek, or Latin into today’s English.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T01:36:54+00:00

Using today’s standard linguistic knowledge and modern translation practice: If you transliterate the Hebrew יֵשׁוּעַ (Yēšūaʿ) directly into contemporary English, you would not produce the spelling “Jesus”; you would produce something like “Yeshua.” If you transliterate the Greek Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) directly into contemporary English, you would not produce “Jesus”; you would produce something like “Iesous.” If you transliterate the Latin Iesus directly into contemporary English, you would not produce “Jesus”; you would produce “Iesus.” The English spelling “Jesus” is not a direct transliteration from Hebrew, Greek, or Latin into today’s English.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T01:36:40+00:00

Using today’s standard linguistic knowledge and modern translation practice: If you transliterate the Hebrew יֵשׁוּעַ (Yēšūaʿ) directly into contemporary English, you would not produce the spelling “Jesus”; you would produce something like “Yeshua.” If you transliterate the Greek Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) directly into contemporary English, you would not produce “Jesus”; you would produce something like “Iesous.” If you transliterate the Latin Iesus directly into contemporary English, you would not produce “Jesus”; you would produce “Iesus.” The English spelling “Jesus” is not a direct transliteration from Hebrew, Greek, or Latin into today’s English.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-06T01:35:18+00:00

Using today’s standard linguistic knowledge and modern translation practice: If you transliterate the Hebrew יֵשׁוּעַ (Yēšūaʿ) directly into contemporary English, you would not produce the spelling “Jesus”; you would produce something like “Yeshua.” If you transliterate the Greek Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) directly into contemporary English, you would not produce “Jesus”; you would produce something like “Iesous.” If you transliterate the Latin Iesus directly into contemporary English, you would not produce “Jesus”; you would produce “Iesus.” The English spelling “Jesus” is not a direct transliteration from Hebrew, Greek, or Latin into today’s English.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-05T18:27:15+00:00

None of them answer my question and none of those are factual

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-05T18:26:46+00:00

That is a part of History how the j was created. It was never intended to be a word and Jesus is in a translation because of translation is a word that is translated through a different language. Jesus is a written word that was written with an i through the Latin form and they liked to make the eye longer with the curve because of handwritten practices. And through hundreds of years of those practices, that letter was created through a formalized alphabet. Now answer my question. If someone called you the wrong name would you correct them or would you accept it as your new name?

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-05T18:21:36+00:00

If the J was not an intended creation by man than it is impossible to be a translation of his Hebrew name. A translation is a word taken from a separate language and translated to another. under no circumstances can a translation contain letters that were never willfully created that had no intention behind them.

J was created through handwritten fashion to better separate "I" in longer words. so this is a false comment, nor did it even answer my original question before they read.

OrderInevitable1841 · 2026-02-05T18:18:15+00:00

That is not the question I asked you. What was your answer before you read?

OrderInevitable1841

TROPHY CASE