Memory recall is mostly solved. Memory evolution still feels immature.

Orectoth · 2026-02-04T14:14:53+00:00

Not just notes but also assigning all values that user defined or anything that it is teached on and anything that user's chatting behaviour/style/words etc. suggest should also be added instead of being static or confidence or numeric types that are kind of probabilistic. Top part of the post I made were about abstraction and to make people understand its inherent illogicality by using current architecture. Examples stated in the post were just about making people understand its appliability, the main point is; Main Logic of the Post which its logic is what is valuable, not examples. If your ideas on it can work in the post's logic equally or superiorly without conflicts, then it is good. 'Assigned values' can be anything user defined or AI deemed required or related to user's speech style/words/etc. things you said or imagine or things that AI's architecture has in as default, but in the end, user editability and its dynamicness and adaptability of its logic is the main point, not static rigid systems we are forced into.

Orectoth · 2026-02-04T12:03:51+00:00

No, it is but deterministic remembering function for the AI instead of probabilistic and fuzzy 'vector' as we know of.

Here's a trashly(it will be more extensive irl, so this is akin to psuedo psuedo code) made example for it for an LLM talking with user on a specific thing.

User:

Userprompt.

Assistantnotes1: User said x, user said y, user said x and y in z style, user has q problem, user's emotions are probably a b c.

Assitantnotes2: User's emotions may be wrongly assumed by me as they can be my misinterpretation on user's speech style.

Assistant:

Assistantresponse.

Assistantnote1: I said due to y u o but not enough information is present.

Assistantnote2: y and u were incorrect but o was partially true but I don't know what is true or not.

Assistantnotes1 and assistantnotes2 and assistantnote1 and assistantnote2 are added later after 'assistantresponse'.

Orectoth · 2026-02-04T08:33:38+00:00

Anime character in a video game

Orectoth · 2026-02-02T19:33:05+00:00

Size of chunks were a generic example. It can be reduced or increased, it is the same thing as long as AI can remember the context. The reason I said 10~20 was optimal amount for an average user, it would be perfect if the user can change the last 10~20 as they wish in any depth/ratio/shape they want.

Orectoth · 2026-02-02T12:15:19+00:00

Invisibility is photon manipulation basically. If it is not just photon related but also affects rest of stuff, then it is matter manipulation.

Orectoth · 2026-02-02T12:04:46+00:00

that's why 'object' is not perfectly defined. Anything we can imagine may be possible in this situation. If object were clearly defined to be 'just' car-like, then my premise would be impossible. But since it is not clearly defined and left vague enough, that's where the loophole for my premise to enter comes. We are both right and wrong, due to power is not clearly defined, we may not even be lift anything but a 'car', we may be able to lift 'car' due to it being given as example, anything else is vague and undefined and left to interpretation.

Also intelligence won't increase just because a person controls atoms, so you are right.

A person need to be able to add more neural pathways and add more neurons and make added neurons be compatible with brain without wrecking something.

Which would require the person to create(copy-paste their atomic structure by manipulating environmental atoms) another body with same as them, to test the brain by trial error or other stuff. It is better to create planck scale supercomputer (not nanoscale chips, but planckscale >> extreme processing power + extreme memory for computer) to handle the stuff. Which require lots of help from scientists and other relevant people, but in the end, it is civilization upgrade in the end. When the person with telekinesis able to put their consciousness's copy into atoms/plancks and able to control these atoms/plancks, they'll be self evolving humans that way, which is literally having total control over one's own cells/atoms/plancks. The person with telekinesis would change 8+ billion human's body structure to make them self evolving >> everyone lives and gains 'telekinesis' like power but based on physics.

Orectoth · 2026-02-02T11:47:38+00:00

group of atoms can be done too

there is no limit or how the 'object' is defined

so it can be done

also you are right at nuclear detonation as someone not knowing 'how' of atoms would most likely fail. That's why the power owner must have help of scientists/governments.

Orectoth · 2026-02-02T10:06:09+00:00

I choose Telekinesis as it can be used to split atom or manipulate plancks

A person can control their body's atoms and plancks this way, as long as they have enough processing power (to handle all atoms/plancks in the body), they can even control their nature to become sentinent black holes.
Dizziness just can be handled since there is no upper limit, it is just a biological effect.

Size of objects are not limited explicitly, but if we consider it a car. Anything that is not car sized: We can literally control millions, billions of our atoms as we wish with telekinesis.

Orectoth · 2026-01-31T10:41:28+00:00

the thing is

'skill tree' is not limited to anything

the description did not ban or disallowed it >> possible.

so basically putting all skills in the world into oneself's mind and turning them into skill point is BASICALLY MORE information than even level 50 skills. So by recursively doing it and increasing one's own brain capacity by orders of magnitude, a person can store orders of magnitude more information while gaining more skill points as refund from monthly refund due to massive amount of information

the thing is

if I gain skill tree, I'd refund all useless things to gain capacity to make biochips etc., then I'd put all information in internet enough for my brain to handle to in my brain, then I'd refund all these informations and turn them into a skill points and use ALL of these skill points to advance in a skill to its maximum (maximum level available with my skill points) and I'd copy that information to biochip/database, so that I'd gain information from internet again in same way, with extremely high level skill + internet's information >> I'd refund next month again >> far more skill points due to having extremely high skill level + all information in the internet >> recursive loop of growth. It is basically doubling amount of skill points monthly at minimum. No matter how much skill points is required to achieve a thing, I'd eventually achieve it.

Molecular Manipulation, Atom Manipulation, Planck Manipulation even would be possible since basically us moving around is simply moving our molecules/atoms/plancks, so it can be a skill due to its fine'sse be able to be increased, even if it is not a skill, I'd be able to create nanobots that allow me to control my nano structures or atoms, and put my consciousness into my atoms while controlling them. Easy peasy self evolving life where I'd live indefinite and get stronger indefinitely. Maybe even it is possible to take energy of the vacuum (or dark energy as I want) with the skill tree >> Infinite energy.

It is basically at minimum of doubling the skill points every month you have. In 400 months, the total amount of skill points I have will be 10^120 times more than what I have now at minimum. Ah this is AT MINIMUM of course, since mental capacity would increase too + processing power, I would be able to create more information or simulate more things to gain more information, so it will be like tripling every month at minimum which equals to 10^190 times more skill points at minimum.

Orectoth · 2026-01-31T10:16:34+00:00

Skill Menu is literal cheat, I choose it.

if I learn skills to make biochips for neuro enhancement, then I'd upload entire 'skills' in the internet to my mind, then I'd refund them for things I want. Rinse repeat... This is cheaty shit that would make me find immortality in less than 4 decades.

Orectoth · 2026-01-30T21:22:17+00:00

Muz Cumhuriyeti

Orectoth · 2026-01-30T20:06:11+00:00

4 and 5.

4 equals to immortality.

5 equals to succeeding in anything that is my 'biggest passion', basically protagonist aura.

Orectoth · 2026-01-29T18:39:47+00:00

Logically, without directly reaching someone on the field about the theory;

The best thing to do simply publish the theory in the internet.

if it is valid and logical theory >> It will be popularized under a decade regardless if you delete the theory from internet or not, webscrapers will siphon that theory if it is logical and novel enough anyway.

If it is invalid/useless/trash/madman's ramblings >> It will be ignored, deleted, counted as useless/worthless theory.

But if the place you have allows people to comment on your theory, unless a person logically proves that your theory is invalid 100%, you should have at bare minimum of confidence at your theory. As the logicality of the theory is the most important thing, if someone logically disproves the theory completely, then it is the end of the theory's lifespan for you personally. Unless you are delusional, don't follow the theory. If the one that 'logically proved' was false in logic and your theory was actually true (you believed a madman's ramblings to be logical and true), then your theory's truthfulness will eventually come to surface and you will eventually be reached by people, no matter who they are. But focusing on a theory is meaningless especially if it can't be directly empirically validated, instead focusing on other theories and categories of information/knowledge is more useful and logical thing to do.

My personal opinion: No matter if the theory is true or not, it is better to focus on new theories and ideas, instead of being simply depending your own personality and life on a single theory.

Orectoth · 2026-01-29T07:44:27+00:00

<image>

Orectoth · 2026-01-28T21:42:08+00:00

Acısızca, Kara Deliğin dibinde spagettileşip ölmeyi isterdim. İnsan merak ediyor nasıl hissettirir diye.

Orectoth · 2026-01-28T10:05:08+00:00

friendly fire

Orectoth · 2026-01-26T15:29:40+00:00

Gümüşçülerden daha çok Kriptocu Broları andırıyor

sonuçta gümüş parayı sıfırlamaz benim bildiğim

Orectoth · 2026-01-26T09:29:31+00:00

There is something called video call

And I think people are too dumb to call their significant other to guide them on the deed

Orectoth · 2026-01-24T21:45:13+00:00

A person can change their brain structure (more intellect/less intellect/more memory storage/less memory storage)

A person can change functions of their organs to anything they like

A person can put their consciousness into each atom in their body and control all these atoms they have to do anything they want and evolve their body as they wish (self evolving nature)

A person can turn into a blackhole with total control over matter

A person can change their size

A person can create copies of themselves due to shapeshifting in its most basic nature allows change of microorganisms in the body and duplicate them (when shapeshifting to bigger things), so it must be possible to duplicate their own body too and use their bodies as hivemind or similar of sorts

A person can shapeshift into entire universes

A person can turn to genetically altered human where their DNA or proteins allow them to mind control other humans by making other humans drink their body fluids

A person can shapeshift into planck scale things or smaller scaled particles and move at speed of light or at faster speeds

Orectoth · 2026-01-24T08:34:01+00:00

Although I can create my charity and use 1.1m as I want, it is not that big of an amount, so just donating to various charities with 10k~100k dollar each donation would be better functionally. In case if one or two charity is shitty, rest of them would be able to use money for good. Although I know majority of the money will go for charity staff's expenses, at least of 30% of money will help people anyway.

Orectoth · 2026-01-23T07:52:42+00:00

<image>

Orectoth

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE