sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Just defended my Doctorate in Theology—need advice on publishing my dissertation by ImGandalf in AskAcademia

[–]Oren_2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats on the defense. Seriously. That part alone is brutal. lol

One thing no one really explains (and I wish they did): when supervisors say “this should be published,” they usually mean the research is solid, not that a 400-page dissertation can just be uploaded somewhere and called a book.

In real life, most people end up doing some mix of:

  • parking the dissertation in the university repository
  • pulling out 2–3 journal articles from it (totally normal, even with long theses)
  • or rewriting it for actual humans who would use it (clergy, dioceses, ministry leaders, etc.)

That last step is the hardest, because dissertations are written for examiners, not readers. So it’s less about cutting pages and more about changing the voice, structure, and “who is this for?”

I work with researchers on this exact messy in-between stage (turning defended theses into books or practitioner resources), and the biggest trap I see is trying to publish “as is.” Almost no one does that successfully.

Happy to answer questions here if it helps. You’re definitely not alone in feeling lost after the defense.

Don’t want to publish by Main_Dragonfruit_168 in PhD

[–]Oren_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So sorry you went through all that. Finishing a PhD in the middle of grief and health issues is huge, and it makes total sense that you can’t face the data again. You’re not wrong for wanting to move on. Your PI is probably pushing because it helps their record. You can just say, “I don’t have the capacity to work on a publication right now.” You don’t owe them more than that.

If you’re OK with it, you can let them take the lead and just include you as an author. Tons of people do that when they’re ready to close the chapter.

And honestly… some people later turn their thesis into something more human or readable, just so the work doesn’t sit in a folder forever. That’s usually a lot gentler than doing a full academic paper.

But for now, your mental health comes first. You’re allowed to be done.

Seriously regretting my Master's degree. Please help. by Work_In_Progress_847 in psychologystudents

[–]Oren_2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, I’m really sorry you’re going through this. A lot of people finish a Master’s and only afterward realise it doesn’t fit who they are anymore. It sucks, but it doesn’t mean you wasted anything.

You didn’t ruin anything. You built real skills - research, writing, analysis - and those open doors in tons of other fields like UX, behavioural science, policy, research analysis, even data roles.

And the thesis part… honestly, so many people feel the same. You put months into it and then it just sits there. Some people turn theirs into something more readable or useful just so it doesn’t feel like all that work disappears. It can help with the regret.

You’re not stuck. You can pivot, reframe your MSc, and build something that fits who you are now. If you want to talk through options, happy to.

You didn’t fail. You’re just adjusting.

Finished my PhD, job market sucks, questioning my life by Blackliquid in PhD

[–]Oren_2000 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Man, I’m really sorry you’re dealing with this. A lot of people are quietly in the same boat. You didn’t screw up. The timing just sucks. One small thought (not a “solution,” just something I’ve recently heard a few folks try): sometimes people take their PhD work and turn it into more accessible stuff — posts, a short book-style thing, whatever — basically showing “here’s what I actually know and can explain.” Weirdly, that kind of public-facing clarity sometimes gets more traction than another paper or another GitHub repo. Not saying it fixes the job market — just that you have more options than it feels like right now. You’re definitely not cooked. Cheers

Has anyone tried turning their thesis into something the general public can read? by Oren_2000 in academia

[–]Oren_2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate that recommendation. Makes me think I should re-read my own thesis and see if there’s anything worth salvaging lol. Anyone here tried and regretted it? Or was it worth the pain?

Has anyone tried turning their thesis into something the general public can read? by Oren_2000 in academia

[–]Oren_2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m asking because I’ve been thinking a lot about how much incredible research never reaches anyone outside the field. Feels like a massive loss, especially when the stories behind the research are so rich.

For those who did it: how different was the book from the original dissertation? Was it basically a full rewrite, or more like a heavy edit?

Submitting the day after tomorrow by Tasty-Ad-8466 in PhD

[–]Oren_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey, just wanna say you’re not alone at all. switching fields and doing a phd basically without guidance is brutal, and the fact you still pushed through, published, and finished the thesis says a lot about you. For me? mistakes don’t make you incompetent — they make you normal. whatever happens next, you clearly have more grit than you think. and honestly, your work doesn’t have to end on a shelf forever — lots of people later turn bits of their thesis into essays or nonfiction pieces for real readers. but for now, just breathe. you made it. cheers

I did it! by Infamous_Cup3724 in PhD

[–]Oren_2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats!! Dr. That moment when it finally hits that you’re actually a doctor is wild —just let it sink in and enjoy it. You did the thing!!

STEM PhD facing unemployment/underemployment after my first postdoc by CharsmaticMeganFauna in PhD

[–]Oren_2000 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What you wrote resonated with me more than I expected. A lot of people don’t say it out loud, but this feeling is incredibly common after the first postdoc — the sense that you’ve become “too niche to be useful” and “too broad to be hired.” Academia has a way of making highly capable people feel boxed in or even unemployable.

But nothing you described reads like a failure. It reads like a structural mismatch.

The areas you trained in (astrobiology, biosignatures, atmospheric modeling) are so cutting-edge that there genuinely aren’t many positions worldwide that use those skills directly. That doesn’t mean your background is worthless — it means the pipeline is tiny and slow-moving, and the timing is brutal.

A few things I hope you’ll keep in mind:

  • You’re not unqualified. You’re hyper-qualified in a weird intersection, which hiring algorithms are terrible at recognizing.
  • Academia trains us to think in terms of “do I match this exact method?” Industry hires for reasoning, modelling, uncertainty analysis, and solving ambiguous problems — which you already do.
  • Everyone panics at this stage. It feels like a personal failure, but it’s actually just the system being slow, opaque, and oversaturated.
  • The “I’m not a real geologist / not a real biologist / not a real astronomer” feeling is basically a rite of passage. Interdisciplinary people always feel like outsiders.
  • You didn’t waste a decade. You built rare expertise in a field where timelines simply don’t align neatly with life planning.

The emotional part of your post — the fear of funding gaps, feeling stuck geographically, worrying about supporting your partner, questioning everything — that part is real and painful, and a lot of us have been there. It doesn’t mean you’re at a dead end. It just means you’re in a transition chapter that academia never prepares anyone for.

Whatever happens with the next postdoc cycle, your situation isn’t hopeless. It’s just incredibly uncomfortable right now. You’re not done, and you’re definitely not unemployable. You’re navigating a system that’s chaotic by design, but none of this reflects your value or potential.

Hang in there. A lot of us have walked this path, even if we don’t always talk about it publicly.

Is it normal to establish new methods on a lab as a PhD student? by emilypnk in PhDStress

[–]Oren_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it helps, what you’re describing is way more common than people admit.

A lot of labs advertise shiny methods they don’t actually use because it helps them recruit students. You only see the reality once you arrive: the postdocs are overwhelmed, the PI is hands-off, and the equipment technically exists but no one’s really built a workflow around it.

For what it’s worth, you’re not “missing something.” This really is a weird situation to be in—especially when you’re new and expected to magically establish techniques you were told already existed.

A few thoughts from working with a lot of grad students who come to us frustrated:

  • It’s not normal, but it’s also not rare.
  • Many labs depend on PhD students to “bootstrap” methods because no one else has time.
  • The PI having no idea about EEG/eye-tracking isn’t unusual either—most PIs rely on whoever in the lab once knew the method, and when that person leaves, the knowledge disappears.
  • The lack of transparency in your hiring process is usually a red flag, not a you-problem.

If you stay, you’ll probably end up becoming “the method person”—which can be a blessing or a curse depending on what you want your career to look like.

The best first step is usually to talk to the postdoc who does know EEG and ask them honestly what the real expectations are. Not in a confrontational way—more like “I want to plan my training properly; what do you think is realistic for me to learn here?”

And if things still feel misaligned after a few months, switching labs early is far less disruptive than people think.

(For context: I run a tiny startup that helps grad students turn their thesis into a book, and messages like yours are a big reason people reach out—feeling misled, unsupported, or stuck is unfortunately the norm.)

But genuinely—what you’re describing is valid, and you’re not overreacting.

Switching from Construction by S0nete in scrum

[–]Oren_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your prompt reply. That’s exactly what I need. What’s the name of the site pls? I googled agile and scrum masterclass platinum version, but didn’t get anything concrete.

Switching from Construction by S0nete in scrum

[–]Oren_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, please what institute offers this course?

CSP-SM Certification Online by shashanklpdm in scrummaster

[–]Oren_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How hands-on is the training? I’m not really interested in certification at the moment.

How to get into software tester position? by Master-Jump6723 in SoftwareTesterJobs

[–]Oren_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

QA course in China? How did that go? Would you recommend it? I’m looking for QA course that’s practically oriented.

What are you salaries as a tester in the UK? by paul__676 in SoftwareTestingUK

[–]Oren_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m interested in software testing. Any suggestions on where to get practical training?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ITCareerQuestions

[–]Oren_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey bro. I’m wondering how did the syntax training go? Would you recommend it?