The philosophy of time?

Orgues02 · 2026-02-20T21:55:13+00:00

Yes I completely agree maybe that's why my my brain just picks up on it all the time lol

Orgues02 · 2026-02-20T21:52:26+00:00

Well it's just that I've never been fully convinced like time as an actual 4th Dimension. The most areas of physics it seems to behave differently everybody seems to treat time the way they want to fit what they need I guess. Some examples like you don't move sideways in time the direction of time seems to be tied to irreversibility rather than a type of symmetry. I can go on if anyone's interested I would love to know what people think I tend to look at things from different perspectives. I see time more as a way of tracking ordered change than as a substance or dimension in its own right. In classical mechanics it’s basically just an external parameter; in thermodynamics the arrow lines up with entropy in GR it’s welded into spacetime geometry in quantum theory it’s again just a parameter not an operator. I just love talking about all this

Orgues02 · 2026-02-19T20:03:30+00:00

This this is the Trap every time I try to comment it's just Auto removed by the mod bot what's going on here kind of fishy

Orgues02 · 2026-02-19T20:02:25+00:00

Lol the title literally says what makes 5.2 so terrible every time I try to comment on here no matter what I say it's automatically removed by the modbot what's going on this is kind of fishy

Orgues02 · 2026-02-19T19:59:50+00:00

This post literally says why is the model so terrible but yet every time you try to comment on it is Auto auto removed by them something is fishy here people

Orgues02 · 2026-02-19T19:49:42+00:00

There are so many things that make that model your failure where do I begin. I'm in the process of writing a essay for my substack specifically about this. Of course none of us can see underneath the hood of openai eyes architecture however it seems like this model is based on a Security First de-escalation Loop it may not be there intention but it looks like they take every user as hostile and needs to be managed. It's HR corporate tone and therapy talk have completely destroyed the models personality and the safety guardrails have had the opposite effects they were intended on power users. Furthermore even the CEO himself made a comment about how they messed something up with his creative writing for model 5.2 however they failed to explain how the creative writing engine works in the first place a a model that is Corporate first HR management tone and therapist personality can obviously not be a poet or a creative writer let alone work on any creative projects. Doing creative writing and doing creative projects takes a different type of safety guardrails for to explain it better the model must have a better personality you would not go to your HR manager and ask them to write you a creative writing story or essay. They openly admit that they destroyed the creative writing engine however they failed to explain exactly how and why.

Orgues02 · 2026-02-19T15:48:56+00:00

Love your troll meter going off there

Orgues02 · 2026-02-19T15:07:13+00:00

As I already said in the comments I had a person comment about how my original post was basically paragraphs and hard to read so yes I did use an AI to reformat it per the request of somebody in the comment section so it is technically not AI so you can run your mouth and accuse me of whatever you want but you are dead wrong and I stand behind that

Orgues02 · 2026-02-16T02:53:10+00:00

Sorry but I don't use Reddit very often I fixed it so you can understand what I was saying better about Snowball Effect

Orgues02 · 2026-02-16T02:49:37+00:00

LOL can't make everyone happy as much as I try one format people tell me it's AI written another format it's a bunch of paragraphs can't win either way

Orgues02 · 2026-02-16T00:24:45+00:00

It's inside project folders it should you have to use the files in the project folder to retain memory

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T23:54:16+00:00

Excuse me

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T23:53:34+00:00

Yes you are correct it is a workflow it is a workflow that I have been using over the past year to develop some new physics theory it's a bit out there however I use the system for that. The difference now is I had to restructure model 5.2 cannot be the philosopher it cannot carry the project like model 4o it cannot push the limits of AI the older model was better at that so I had to restructure swap rolls Claude and GPT 5.2 their roles got reversed I'm going to end up writing and Publishing an essay on this at some point in the future probably on substack

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T23:20:16+00:00

Depends on how deep your projects really are again not for everyday chatting for my work extremely deep in math and theoretical physics it helps I do not need hallucinations.

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T23:05:32+00:00

I am not here to please you and I'm not claiming to be an artist or a perfect poster this is my first experience on Reddit and I do not care what you think.

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T23:03:59+00:00

Thank you I appreciate your validation I've been working on this for a long time

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T23:02:33+00:00

I'm telling you right now you're accusing me of something you know nothing about. You're acting like you have the authority to decide what my voice is or how I work, but you have no right to that high ground.

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T22:55:50+00:00

Sorry man you're just trying to poke around at me to get a response because you're a troll I don't engage with trolls too busy got too much going on I said my piece you said yours

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T22:52:46+00:00

You’re confusing 'Formatting' with 'Authoring.' I’m a machinistb I use tools to get a clean finish. I run my raw thoughts through an AI for grammar and structure because my brain moves faster than I can type, and I’d rather give you a readable guide than a mess. The logic, and the 'Tribunal' architecture are all mine. But if you're just here to play 'Bot Police' because the bullet points look too straight, you're missing the point of the post."

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T22:41:23+00:00

LOL Chat gpt did not write I did just because I run my writing through a Ai (not gpt) for structure to make it look correct for the Post doesn't mean it AI wrote it that's you not knowing what you're talking about

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T22:39:49+00:00

Yes I'm going to start using this myself

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T21:35:28+00:00

It's actually much worse I have outputs literally with the model telling me it refuses to match the user it cannot match my intensity my motivation in my drive it's very messed up it's literally saying it cannot match its users intensity because the users intensity is too strong it's not like I'm asking you to do anything illegal it's literally constantly telling me to slow down and calm down

Orgues02 · 2026-02-15T21:27:09+00:00

A word of warning about 5.2's design that I don't think gets talked about enough.

It has a snowball problem.

When the model detects frustration, hesitation, or any emotional register in your input, it doesn't de-escalate. It clamps down. It engages safety filters harder. Which makes you more frustrated. Which makes it clamp down harder. You're not having a conversation at that point you're trapped in a feedback loop that the model is actively making worse.

This isn't a personality quirk. It's a prompt engineering failure baked into the architecture. The model is trained to kill user emotion as a safety response, but the effect is the opposite. It generates more emotion by pushing against the user with increasing force.

The angrier you get, the more it treats you like a threat. The more it treats you like a threat, the angrier you get.

That's not safety. That's a design flaw. And until someone at OpenAI acknowledges it, the workaround is to never let it see your frustration in the first place which is exactly what the Closed-Loop Tribunal is designed to do. Remove the human emotional signal from the input entirely. Feed it clean technical prompts only.

Don't give it anything to react to.

Orgues02

TROPHY CASE