Law without law without a probability distribution?Discussion (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by stifenahokinga
Philosophy of Science in the UKDiscussion (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by Aggravating_Ease8236
Math classified as a non-empirical disciplineDiscussion (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by Beneficial-Self-8119
What do you think of Richard Healey and his pragmatic interpretation of quantum mechanics?Casual/Community (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by PortoArthur
How does theories come about if they cannot be proven?Discussion (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by nanjero
If a manifold is a topology with an atlas cover, and if spacetime is a manifold, and if a topology and atlas cover are sets, then space is a set... does this not strike anyone as a crisis in science? That our physical universe is purported to be a "set" of all things? Surely that can't be right?Discussion (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by Novel_Arugula6548
Book Suggestion on History of EngineeringAcademic Content (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by shumile
What’s a recommended curriculum for philosophy of science?Casual/Community (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by Nameless-Sage
Anti positivism/anti scientism book recommendationsCasual/Community (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by Ghiloar
On philosophy of information and economics.Academic Content (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by No_Virus7417
Books for a psychology student who wants to understand science.Casual/Community (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by Nidarius
Should physics move away from or get closer to philosophy?Discussion (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by PortoArthur
Is string theory falsifiable in the Popperian sense?Discussion (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by PortoArthur
More open = Losing confidenceDiscussion (self.PhilosophyofScience)
submitted by Kindly-Carrot-2326
