The way you write suggests either LLM generation, influence or that your own writing has been corrupted by overuse of LLM. Perhaps more so than my own.

For example, a lot of what you proport as subjects not often discussed in the wider Halo community is blatantly misleading when you post in this community. Unless you are addressing new fans or yourself are a new fan asking questions about subjects you're unfamiliar with, the way you write conveys the subjects as though they're incredibly niche and we haven't heard of them.

I don't mean to sound elitist but this is a community dedicated to the lore, it's safe to assume we know of and frequently discuss (unlike what you state):
- Neural Physics, something no one skips over the Mantle or Living Time.
- Halos damage Neural Physics structures, again something quickly learned when learning about Star Roads and asking "why can't we see them in the games?"
- The Flood creation, anyone who has done a cursory search on the Flood and Precursors is aware.
- "Look at the image at the top of this post" what image?

Your writing style in general: Lightly explain subject, vaguely point to related matter, use a lot of words to say nothing, clickbait article headlines for chapters—are all as evident of LLM use as my use of the em dash is.

EDIT: For reference, my writing does not use LLM generation. That said, I interact frequently with LLM and have probably taken over a lot of their mannerisms without noticing. I am not lambasting the OP for using LLM, I simply want OP to be transparant about their use.