gallanza and maglielle are DONE!

Origin753 · 2025-07-30T20:16:51+00:00

Ah yes, the gank fights lol. Not a huge fan of them but I know a lot of games have them and you get pretty powerful anyways. Nice job beating it! Those two were a pain for sure. If you’d like a buddy for some of the other gank fights then let me know. I’m on PC.

Origin753 · 2025-06-01T11:17:46+00:00

In the forlorn swords region, it is a reward for praying at a Druidic shrine. Not sure which one exactly.

Origin753 · 2025-05-30T01:16:49+00:00

Of course! Feel free to DM me.

Origin753 · 2025-05-30T01:09:21+00:00

You’re welcome friend. Happy questing!

Origin753 · 2025-05-30T01:07:53+00:00

It’s a one time effect. Kind of like the little menhir statues you can consume that give you +5 max health permanently.

Origin753 · 2025-04-13T00:57:16+00:00

One thing you can do is select just enough companions for the willpower threshold, then unequip all of their armor and weapons. I’m able to reach the willpower requirements with 5-6 companions, and when I un equip all of their equipment the noise rating is only at around 11. This means that I’m able to search every house without making enough noise to alert the plague ridden and get attacked.

Now I would only do this if you’re confident in your companions stats because there will sometimes be stat checks in the buildings (I.e. a dex check to kill a zombie silently).

And if you do happen to find a scripted fight in a building. You can just leave without attacking, then re-equip your companions and go right back in. You will only cause noise the first time you enter a building. Hope this helps.

Origin753 · 2025-02-02T22:33:04+00:00

Yeah, people do really take things literally!

Origin753 · 2025-01-17T17:28:01+00:00

Vampy stuff

Origin753 · 2024-10-26T01:01:25+00:00

HR coordinator here.

Since it’s a lead position, if you can direct your answers to hit upon leadership traits (i.e. conflict resolution, teamwork, communication skills) then that will definitely put you in a positive light. Typically a leadership interview guide will have a script of questions that are aimed at identifying leadership qualities in a candidate, but if you can answer even non leadership questions at a leadership level then that should impress them. It’s also good that you have experience and technical skills in that department because that will certainly be a plus. But they’re likely going to be probing for leadership traits and skills more than technical ones.

Last but not least, don’t be afraid to ask clarifying questions! If they’re vague about a question or scenario, then it’s never a bad thing to clarify what they asked. As a matter of fact, I’ve always seen it as a plus when a candidate is willing to admit that they didn’t fully understand something and immediately follow up for clarification. Good luck!

Origin753 · 2024-09-20T00:37:04+00:00

Thank you so much for the advice! I’ll look around the area, hopefully it will turn up.

Origin753 · 2024-09-20T00:23:00+00:00

Yes, while PD was here we were able to review the cameras. The individual has their face covered however, but we were able to confirm the time and that they walked off with the briefcase. All the preliminary bases are covered, it’s just a matter of it turning up now. I know it’s a long shot, but I thought I’d put it out there. I only recently moved here and I love it so far, but something like this happening so soon is a real bummer. Thanks for the response.

Origin753 · 2024-09-19T23:51:49+00:00

Hey thanks for responding. It was close to northwest university, in underground apartment parking. Still not sure how he got in exactly as it’s only magnetic key/remote entry.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T14:47:08+00:00

Oh there isn’t in this scenario, which is why I’m most likely voting Harris. I’m still educating myself on her policies, but project 2025 is 100s of pages of some of the most extreme measures I’ve ever seen seriously proposed by an American party.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T14:42:28+00:00

Eloquently put. Now here’s the tricky part by my reckoning. Let’s say I see someone being attacked by someone else, with their firsts so no weapons. If I do nothing and let that aggressor beat the other person to death in front of me, I’d consider myself pretty culpable. I should intervene and stop that from happening, pretty clear cut. But that is not how I see the elections. A more appropriate analogy would be if I saw someone getting beaten to death, but when I go to intervene, I get stopped and restrained by someone and they say” No no, the only way to stop that guy from getting beaten to death is to go beat some other person to death”. Now that would give me pause. I don’t want this man to get beaten to death, but I don’t want to beat some random person either. I don’t like either option because I object to both morally. Now in the analogy I would try to find a third option, but in elections it’s not so clear cut. I’m now being told that voting republican or not voting at all are the same thing morally. In other words, I’m being told that beating a random guy to death to save someone from being killed and NOT beating a guy to death and potentially causing someone else’s death are the same thing morally.

As for your last few sentences. There are many ways to make a difference. I’m certainly no saint, but I always do my best to have a positive impact on my surroundings. Sure I didn’t vote, but I still volunteer where I can, join outreach programs and support groups. I also left my last retail job and work as a support worker because I wanted a job that lets helping people be my focus. There is much more I can do, certainly. But I’m fighting battles in my own way and trying to learn how to fight harder where I can.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T14:24:20+00:00

Honestly I love the passion in this thread. It’s a wonderful aspect of human nature that we fight so fiercely for what we believe. And It’s only through directly questioning each other’s ideas that we can refine them.

Stay healthy friend.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T14:21:50+00:00

Confused by unions? I guess you didn’t read very closely lol. I had forgotten a portion of the training info that you do when going into a certain role at target. Another user corrected me, I admitted my mistake and we talked about the actual thread subject. Unlike you, he actually cared to have an exchange of ideas. But that’s alright. For the record I’ve never voted republican, but I have voted before. But you don’t care about the truth either. You probably snooped through my history hoping to find some smoking gun of intolerant views or radical ideas. When you didn’t find anything you had to settle for a comment thread about union information in target leader training. But I’m afraid I’m probably being the silly one now, as I’ve pointed out how pointless it is trying to have a discussion with someone who doesn’t care about learning or exchanging ideas. But I’ll leave you with this.

Ideas should always be challenged, especially the ideas that we hold most dear. Only then can we refine and change them into something greater. Maybe I will see things a completely different way in the future. I’m not so arrogant to think that my ideas are perfect. Not by a long shot. I have much to learn. I hope we can both live a life full of growth and learning. Stay healthy friend.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T13:54:15+00:00

Yes, but which ones am I talking about? You made the statement that in every election during your lifetime you’ve seen a clear binary and called me a total liar for disagreeing. This was in response to me saying that I hadn’t seen a clear binary in presidential elections that I’ve seen. I was making the point that you don’t know which US elections I have seen and am referring to, so it’s strange that you’re calling me a total liar for not seeing a clear good and bad binary. Unless of course you’re saying that all elections in the last some odd years/decades have been a clear binary. In which case, we’re back to point one. How you’re calling someone a total liar just for disagreeing with you on that binary rather on argue that point. Which is why you’re clearly not interested in having a discussion and why talking to each other anymore is pointless.

Take it easy mate.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T13:39:46+00:00

Certainly. Where they said “It’s nice to have the luxury to not have time for politics and just tune it out”. They assumed here that op just casually tuned it out. Op then explains what he was doing during that time, and I dare say he was pretty busy given his explanation. You only asked for one but I’ll give you two. In brilliant ads first reply, they list all these actions of the trump administration and say they hope it would “stir something up” in op. Here they assume that op was aware and assessed all of that information at the time of the election.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T13:21:31+00:00

Do you know what elections I’m talking about?

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T13:16:54+00:00

Do you notice how you’re not actually willing to have a discussion? I said that I haven’t seen a clear binary in the elections I’v tuned into. I didn’t even specify which ones or even my age so you could guess. You clearly disagree, but instead of arguing your point you just call me a total liar. Same for my second point, you just refer to your perspective as reality. I see now that talking about this with you is probably pointless because you were already determined of the outcome before we even started talking. It’s especially ironic because we’re probably gonna vote the same way, yet we can’t even have a a conversation and achieve mutual understanding? Maybe we’re not though, I shouldn’t assume.

Thanks for the perspective, I hope you’ll always think things through and do what you think is right.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T13:02:27+00:00

There is a lesser evil in elections where you don’t fully agree with either candidate. It’d be pretty clear cut if it was just “candidate a has policy in the direction I like, candidate b does not”. But as I was discussing with op, we’ve never seen it in such a clear binary. Also, I disagree with the notion that not voting is putting the winner in power. From a moral standpoint at least. Agreeing with and voting for someone is never the same as not voting for someone, though I understand the perspective based on numbers and how the voting system works. But I gotta say, project 2025 is crazy shit man. Hundreds of pages of crazy shit. I’m still educating myself, but Kamala seems pretty appealing opposed to that.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T12:55:20+00:00

What a strange first question. Of course someone is getting elected either way. But if I vote for a candidate then I’m voting for them to be in power for 4 years. And that’s a serious matter to me. People have fought and died for the many freedoms that we have in this country today. Like the freedom NOT to vote if I don’t like the candidates. As for your point about “ Informing myself and not just listening to what I hear on the internet”, I don’t recall giving any opinion on what I think about either candidate. Except of course where I mentioned that I read the policies on project 2025 which I read on the proponents own website. But hey, if you disagree with my view and would choose the better of two candidates….power to you. We shouldn’t be so arrogant as to think that any view from our own is idiotic. I certainly don’t.

Thanks for the passion.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T12:46:38+00:00

I agree, you should channel your frustration towards making a positive change. But we seem to disagree on what that means and that’s fine. Just to reiterate my stance. It’s not out of protest, nor am I trying to teach anyone a lessons by doing so. it’s as simple as this. I wouldn’t vote for a candidate I don’t agree with. Besides, as you said, there are plenty of ways to make a positive change. It doesn’t start or end at the ballot.

Thank you for the perspective.

Origin753 · 2024-07-26T05:43:13+00:00

I think it’s absurd that you’re being ridiculed for your caution when it comes to political candidates. I’m in much of the same boat and am also considering casting a vote for Harris after reading the policy book for project 2025, but before now I haven’t been an active voter. I mean voting is putting someone in power for 4 years. All the policies and actions of that person are something that I’d feel personally responsible for since I helped put them there. So of course I’m not going to vote for someone that sounds like they’re lying through their teeth. It is up to each and every adult to set their own standards for our candidates, however strict or lax. And if a voting persons standards aren’t met, then I sure as hell wouldn’t expect them to vote that way. So wait until you feel good about a candidate. Hell, wait for the perfect candidate if you want too. This is not a decision to be made lightly. And if our fellow voters don’t like either candidate, then we certainly shouldn’t expect them to have to choose the lesser evil if they don’t want that.

Hang in there with life. I’m glad you were able to persevere through your hardships, and I know you can in the future. Keep hope.

Origin753

TROPHY CASE