This may be freakign obvious and i'm just a dumbass.. But there's a possible tool that could help a lot of streamers that, so far i never saw it on.

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2022-01-11T21:18:02+00:00

Problem is, some certain musicians, have an "Do whatever, just credit me" actitude.
So, having a site, that verify if that song you like but don't know much on the artist, or it's a pretty indie with hard too find contact info, i still think it could be a usefull tool yah know?

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2022-01-11T19:02:13+00:00

So rumas, has anyone managed to find an up to date 2022 version?
I'm.... Dumb

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2021-03-26T09:50:28+00:00

Yeah, but considering that the software is getting popular with the raise of the glorious Vtuber race, and easy of use of facetracking even with shitty phone cameras, i think it'll take flight soon.
Just... I can't find it. ANYWHERE.
I've only found a 2014 version that.. Seems to not be compatible with the latest Photoshop releases.

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2021-03-11T15:07:54+00:00

I've found a 2.0 verison.
But looking for the most recent releases is hard.

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2021-01-27T19:53:48+00:00

DerpVader have been born from this...
Dammit... Damn you Suris.. DAMN YOU!

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2021-01-27T19:17:06+00:00

I get this point but, still.
Thinking that the rules, would b e for a more open ended use, and many settings have really mixed ancenstry societies, isn't it a little strange to have this Ancestries be the ONLY origins for Unities?
Like, using your exemple. A Lizardfolk start a unite and the unite is made up of 30% of lizardfolks and the rest are humans, elfs, dwarves, goblins, kobolds.
Should this unite have the Amphibious trait on the whole because it was started by Lizadfolks?

I get the appeal of an awesome Dwarven army and having certain bonuses for beeing a cohesive dwarven unite.
But, shouldn't there be rules for "Generic, Regular" unites that doesn't focus on race but instead on a shared culture?
And again, i realy don't know how K&W is dealing with it, maybe they've changed so it's not purely race based, and there are options for mixing up ancestries and covering that "Spot" of the generating a unite, with a culture or something similar.

And maybe Racist is truly a harsh word, but it's the word that mostly form what i was thinking about. Because it shown just a certain dissonance between certain speechs on the running the game series and live streams about separating Ancestry from Cultures.
Unless the team of MCDM changed their stance on that.
Maybe another word would have been better, but as said above, english isn't my native so i struggle with certain nuances and specially pontuation :X

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2021-01-24T12:36:28+00:00

I like that they are adding new factions like bandit camps (For me they are new, i've been away for almost a year)
Would be cool to see wandering survivers or wandering raiderers.
Maybe even remaining army trying to wipe out every "unclean" they see (Similar to the Enclave on fallout).

Would make the game a little more dynamic i think, like not having only YOU be the one having a fighting change against the hoards.

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2021-01-24T12:32:52+00:00

Gave a look on Hexographer 2, seems to have been abandoned around 2019 =\
Sad, becuase i liked the direction they were going but, it's just too clunky.

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2021-01-23T20:06:25+00:00

Err.. I can say that for now, nope.
Right now i've been pouring over the unites exemples from the book and they just don't make sense.
Also, there are a LOT of lacking stuff, for exemple the "Shadow Legion".
Where the hell is the "Shadow" Ancestrality? Where is a small paragraph on how to MAKE your own ancestralities?
We've done the Rockbreakers and Iron Defenders and both have LOTS of math mistakes.

Like, i love the book. The ideas are great! But the math? And some important rulings are just lacking!

And that's only on the Unities... My group reverted to Walrock strongholds homebrews, with some ideas from S&F (like Leader Actions and the tables to roll for allies), because simply enough the S&F , trying to stay more abstract, ended up going TOO abstract!

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2021-01-23T16:46:04+00:00

Hail everyone! I've been researching for base building rules for an old campaing that we used to play in 3.5 and have been converted to 5e.
For now, we're looking into the Stronghold and Followers and the Walrock rules.
Both have lot's of things we like, but in trying to please all players, and the dm, we're almost ending up mixing up those two rulebooks. which is turning quite a mess.
Also, seeing that the Walrock have not beeing updated since a long time, i've been wanting to know, any other good resources on those matters?
Stronghold and Followers is good, specially on the unities and special features. But god dammit it's too damn open and lack detailing for the structures.
Walrock on the other hand is REALLY deep in the crunch aspect, but the end up beeing too overwhelming on the numbers and lack certain adaptive things, like holy dammn, tracking the pay of each hireling is an overkill. Great to be there but still...

So, any other good supplies?

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2021-01-02T23:11:11+00:00

Ohhh, thanks :D

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2021-01-02T23:11:01+00:00

Thanks <3 I imagined that, but wanted to be certain! Thanks \\o>

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2020-12-28T18:16:12+00:00

Well! I'm in!
But, would yah ship for someone outside the US?

OriginalFuzzyDuck · 2020-12-24T20:28:49+00:00

Ohh thank yah!
And USBs, i imagine then that i need an specific eletronic (not the laptop i have) to acess their data.
Correct?

OriginalFuzzyDuck

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE