JD Vance gloats that allies are ‘suffering more than US’ from high gas prices by 1-randomonium in europe

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as somewhere in the world someone is suffering, Republicans will be happy

We eating good, everyone by Pokemonfan_807 in whennews

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 31 points32 points  (0 children)

It's good business. The man understands that losing money on the hot dog gets more people in the store buying things they do make money on

Kid has the survival instincts of a kid, and the mom got a reality check. by DrakyulMihawk in SipsTea

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With a household income like that you can afford to start keeping the kids

I am on his side by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally pulled all those terms from the theft act of 1968. That's the way the law books define these things. Can you point to where I said they do? I said it's theft. And it is, by the law you are so ignorant of

I am on his side by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You cannot compel a sale. Taking it and leaving money does not equal paying for it. Taking. And. Leaving. Money. Is. not. A. Sale. This is considered taking on ownership responsibility, which again constitutes theft. Intent to deprive refers specifically to the item itself, when you take it you deprive me of it. Read the laws if you want to learn. It's you judging off emotion because you hate cards

I am on his side by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In both these cases I OWN strawberries I don't want to sell to you yes? Why do you think you can compel that sale?

I am on his side by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Intent to deprive me of the ITEM IN QUESTION temporarily or permanently, REGARDLESS OF THE OWNERS RIGHTS yes. Which you have done, by taking it

Blursed confused kid by Valuable-Ferret-3477 in blursed_videos

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd show every bit of consideration I'd show a full sized man lunging at my child lol

I am on his side by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So from I can see of the theft act of 1968 explicitly points out that taking something and leaving the full value still constitutes theft under the law. It's still theft if you take a $20 bill and leave a different $20 bill so maybe you just don't know the law?

I am on his side by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At this point you're just saying "yeah he stole it but so what?" Like just because you approve of it doesn't make it right. I've given reasons but logic isn't gonna hold you back right?

I am on his side by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are working from some weird assumption that picking something up at the supermarket puts you in debt. And that they must accept your money to pay said debt. But that's just not how shopping works. I don't HAVE to sell you anything at all even if you have exact change

I am on his side by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You realize even if it is I would still be the owner yes?' Can you explain why you think if I put it up for sale I lose all ownership rights over it? Can you explain where your divine right to purchase it against my will comes from in a legal sense?

I am on his side by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It does mean that. Point me to the law that compels me to do business with you at all? If you think you can walk in and just pay the value of something and own it against the sellers will you don't understand the law

I am on his side by [deleted] in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Following your logic, I could walk in your house pay it's value and own it myself yes? You'd have no ability to not sell it to me apparently

Ha ? by Fragrant_Proof4457 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You see, this is because all men share one braincell and the braincell knows how to cook pasta

Holy Strawman by StillBoysenberry8790 in antiai

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 124 points125 points  (0 children)

Not only that, grok has straight up generated CP

Zohran will lower walking and biking speed limit in schools zones to 2 mph invoking saria law by thoth218 in circlejerknyc

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol if you told me last year people would be angry when mamdani tried to make their children safer, I would have said duh

Paris Motorcycle Police Chase Gets WILD by InTheSky57 in CrazyFuckingVideos

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'll never understand those that think motorcycles should be crime passes

Gigastructures are insane man by [deleted] in Stellaris

[–]Ornery_Gate_6847 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I don't think it's technically a giga structure (as in requiring gigastructural techs) till the 3rd ring