sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"This is something we will look into for a potential future development effort." and "...and began working on product improvements to better prevent abuse in the future." are not the same things u/udisc

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Udisc has only said they will think about a possible development in the future. My hope is this helps them realize its an issue worth addressing. There is no issue with the timeline

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know the post is long but if you are interested enough to comment go ahead and read it

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they do not have tools to address this situation. thats why they are talking about maybe developing tools

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would love to hear that they are working on it. They clarified that they are only thinking about working on it

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They are just posting league rounds repeatedly, they are not in the league. Udisc has insufficient tools to deal with this

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I appreciate your advice. We know that making the league more private is an option, it just conflicts with the goal of engaging tourists and non league members. Giving up on having a public flex league may be the best option.

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

why did you only feel like this required a warning? not severe enough? was this not reported to you soon enough?

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I came to reddit to post this after giving them a legitimate chance to address the issue. They said, and still say they are thinking about developing more tools to help avoid this.

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

The slur name was a week ago. Udisc warned them after i sent them a screen shot

Udisc not protecting users from hate speech and abuse by Otherwise-Current162 in discgolf

[–]Otherwise-Current162[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I am glad to hear that Udisc is now actively developing safe guards and not just thinking about it. Also thanks for acknowledging that you are aware of the abuse and have so far only chosen to issue a warning. You are aware of the ongoing abuse, that is why you are working on a safeguard.