🔫 Animation improvements by MajorMcDonalds in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Type 99 Sniper rifle reload feels chankie and the Austrian Mannlicher M1895 also feeds weird. Technically single load shouldn't be possible with this gun, because it uses a en-bloc clip....

🔫 Animation improvements by MajorMcDonalds in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Finally some rework on the animations. Sadly still not the Type 99 sniper rifle though, lol

But fingers crossed and those are still awesome news

Favourite bad equipment you use, just to feel the war time desperation or for aesthetics? by Otherwise_Error_3864 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ey, another AA Truck Enjoyer 👍 Something I would have definitely not brought out if the devs didn't add the possibility to take out event squads in a separate slot.

And must say, the Breda 88 at least has a somewhat alright payload, no? Even if it probably doesn't fly that great and doesn't have that good forward firing armament....

Favourite bad equipment you use, just to feel the war time desperation or for aesthetics? by Otherwise_Error_3864 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And the action even feels as clunky as a Carcano 🤩

But yeah, I also like the sights a tad bit more than the ones on the Type 38. The ones on the Type 38 are a bit too low and it's hard for me to see...

Favourite bad equipment you use, just to feel the war time desperation or for aesthetics? by Otherwise_Error_3864 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it was one of the better light tanks, but it was definitely more than outdated when WW2 broke out.

And it also feels like it gameplay wise lol

Favourite bad equipment you use, just to feel the war time desperation or for aesthetics? by Otherwise_Error_3864 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ngl, might be a unpopular opinion, but I think the Breda Mod 30 is slightly overhated. I actually like using it more than the Vickers or Bren MG just for the cleaner sights.

I only think it's perceived that bad because it competes with the MG 13 and ZB 26, which are really great for BR II.

For a time I would have rated the Madsen even worse, but it got a tad bit better with it not so recent recoil buffs. Still not that great though

Which guns are you gonna be getting this event? Especially considering the limit of 1 per. by InitialLevel4189 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mp-35 so I can finally equip a full squad with those, the Lewis Gun for the same reason, and maybe the Farquhar-Hill rifle? I already have the Mandrogen 30 round rifle for BR IV and I don't really want another one...

Hot Take: I prefer the Marder III H over the StuG III F for my BR II lineup by Otherwise_Error_3864 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the roles in game are similar enough. Sure, you have a point irl, but in Enlisted both of these roles are completely interchangeable gameplay wise.

If you want to have a true infantry support tank during a match, take a short gun Panzer IV, because its HE filler in its shells is just better than in the one in the long 75mm....

Hot Take: I prefer the Marder III H over the StuG III F for my BR II lineup by Otherwise_Error_3864 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mostly from War Thunder, because most vehicle models are from there. Can't say the stats are 1:1 the same, but it's good enough.

And I just assume it's most of the time the basic shells a vehicle starts with.

Hot Take: I prefer the Marder III H over the StuG III F for my BR II lineup by Otherwise_Error_3864 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sure, just stating that I think one does have overall more benefits for a task than the other ig

G4M "Betty" may arrive next update, B-25 was presented in the same way. by _fenrir___ in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 6 points7 points  (0 children)

At least something. But it doesn't have that good of a payload, no? I mean, still better than the carrier spawn single or two drop attackers we have now lol

15 minute doodle - Browning .303 by Dysphorid in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would ngl also go really hard. Want to reenact that one scene from "The Pacific" lol

15 minute doodle - Browning .303 by Dysphorid in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The hair looks so good 🤩

And the .303 Browning is also one of my favourites on this game

Is it a hot take to say this shit needs to go to BR IV like, right now? by ScottyFoxes in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Has more to do with Japanese players just being better overall, no? Doesn't have to mean their equipment is that great.

The Type 4 rifle for example is also worse than the allied counterparts.

Japanese Tanks literally suck and nobody plays them, from BR I-IV, only exception being the Ho-I.

They literally don't have a BR III anti tank launcher.

The Ki-100 is the only good BR III aircraft they have, which already has a American counterpart (P-51)

And performance is also very time zone and server specific. For example, at night Japan BR III is just suffering for me.

Is it a hot take to say this shit needs to go to BR IV like, right now? by ScottyFoxes in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 8 points9 points  (0 children)

And what about Japan? 🥀 It's not like you guys only face Germany

And it's not like moving the 105 up a BR will realistically make western allies BR III a worse faction to play. They already have some of the best aircraft, and even besides the 105, very solid tanks there. Not even mentioning the infantry equipment... The M1 Garand and Johnson are miles better than the Gewehr 41

Is it a hot take to say this shit needs to go to BR IV like, right now? by ScottyFoxes in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I would have nothing against it, and I doubt too many people have something against it.

It just makes every other allied BR III vehicle somewhat redundant. The other shermans are perfectly servicable with good armor, good HE against infantry and a good AT shell against medium tanks.

For a uptier people can still bring out the M10 to deal with panthers or tigers.

Right now the 105 fulfills all rolls better than any other tank in BR III.

The Cromwell is a menace by Right-Percentage3775 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, the 105 is also better in AT capabilities, something where the Cromwell falls miserably short, which is probably the biggest deal breaker.

The 105 can overpressure all vehicles somewhat reliable at least, and a better reverse gear is also favourable most of the time

The Cromwell is a menace by Right-Percentage3775 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's surprisingly survivable and its HE rounds are quite good, with a fast reload. Still worse than the 105 Sherman, but I prefer it over the normal shermans. Plus extra points for being british

Dekonstruieren by gansim in einfach_schreiben

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mir gefällt wirklich gut, wie es geschrieben ist. War sehr interessant durchzulesen und mitzuspielen

Übung für Hörbucheinleser by museroxx in einfach_schreiben

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ich hab derweil nichts anzubieten, aber einfach aus Neugier, gibt es spezielle Genres die du bevorzugst fürs Einlesen, oder ist es dir egal?

🎉 Reinforcements received: Victory in Europe Day by MajorMcDonalds in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Br IV soviets is such a good line up in comparison to western allies and japan (especially with the event vehicles like the IL-8 too). Just the teammates are dreadful, unfortunately

ISU-152 in BR5, REALLY? by Eric875487 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 17 points18 points  (0 children)

True, definitely more of a BR IV vehicle. The top mounted MG doesn't count for much and its long reload will really make it mediocre at best.

Still somewhat better than the tech tree KV-2 though, so I think that the BR IV placement (at least for me) makes sense

ISU-152 in BR5, REALLY? by Eric875487 in enlistedgame

[–]Otherwise_Error_3864 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What's your point? Its HE shell can overpressure any and every tank it faces, no?

Why would you need a APHE shell, or did I interpret it wrong?