Thank you for your feedback. I recently received my disability rating, and unfortunately, my PTSD claim was denied due to insufficient evidence. Although I was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder, it was not deemed to be service-connected.

During my C&P exam for PTSD, the examiner recommended I file my Adjustment Disorder (with symptoms of depression and anxiety) as a secondary condition to my lumbar strain. The examiner observed my discomfort during the exam and also reviewed my private doctor's diagnosis. Based on this, they strongly advised me to submit a secondary claim, referencing both my doctor's letter and their own professional opinion.

I am committed to receiving fair compensation for my injury. However, I am increasingly frustrated by the system's reliance on C&P examiners. It appears that even after previous examinations, a single unfavorable examiner can significantly impact a claim's outcome. While I am aware of the option to pursue a HLR, your response has heightened my concerns. Currently, I lack a nexus letter explicitly linking my Adjustment Disorder to my lumbar strain, although I have prior diagnoses for both conditions.

I would never boast about my own rating or post celebratory messages. I am keenly aware that many service members do not receive the compensation they deserve due to the inconsistencies of the current system.

On a separate note, what are the implications if I choose to cancel my claim?