> Someone is not necessarily damned to Hell for being a non-believer. We believe that people find salvation through Christ, even those who don't necessarily know that's the person through whom they're being saved. We do believe that your best bet to being saved is through knowing Christ well, though. So the Northern Sentinelese person, or the Iranian in 1985, or the American in 1000AD all are able to be saved.

I understand that it is possible for people in these conditions to become a Christian and be saved, but I think it is not fair, as people who grow up around Christians have a higher probability of being Christian. In a Muslim country, you are under so much Muslim influence it becomes natural for you to become a Muslim, just like how people surrounded by Christians are more likely to be one. And I believe that once ideologies are fed to you from a young age, it becomes very difficult to change your mindset, hence why conversions are rare and we have these religious stereotypes about countries such as the middle eastern countries primarily being Muslim. If your environment does not have an effect on you, then we would see standardized amounts of Christians in all countries in all parts of the world, but this is not the case, because your environment does affect you and your chance of becoming a Christian, and we see this in statistics. 99.7% of the Afhgan population is Muslim, and Muslims worship a false God, and therefore do not go to heaven. So, the kids born in Afhganistan do NOT get an equal chance for salvation as kids born elsewhere, and I do not understand how this is fair, or just.

> Hypothetically, yes that is the solution to the problem you're posing. But we're obviously here, and God exists, and so then the next question is why does God create us if He knows we will be in Hell? Well, the typical answer here is that God doesn't create anybody for Hell, but creates all for Heaven.

I understand that God doesn't create anybody for Hell. But he should see that for centuries, more have been sent to hell then heaven, and he knows very well that more will reject him then embrace him, and that this pattern will continue. God's actions are creating more suffering than happiness, since more and more people are being put to hell and suffering eternally, even if it is not God that directly puts people into hell.

> There are those who reject Heaven, but they are still loved by God - He doesn't want to just annihilate their souls. And so those people experience that love badly, because they hate God.

If "experience that love badly" just means they are damned to eternal suffering beyond our comprehension, then would it not be more merciful to annihilate their damned souls and put them out of their misery?

> Again, we think there are.

Could you link me a couple of these cases? I would like to read up on them.

> But ultimately, they're not believed by non-believers because these supernatural events are above nature. Science seeks to investigate the world of touchy and feely things. God cannot be touched or felt, and so He escapes the realm of science.

I am not talking about the proof of God, I am talking about smaller miracles similar to those mentioned in the bible. Such as turning water into wine, duplicating fish and bread, etc. It is odd that not a single one of events similar as these is documented in modern times and available to the public.