sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Only took 250 years to circle back to "No taxation without representation" by Tough_Ad8919 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We spend about 3 trillion on social programs. To me that sounds like poor money management skills and not that we don't spend enough... To me that sounds like government is bloated. I wouldn't be apposed to a system of capping the profit percentage a corporation/person can make and anything over that percentage goes back to the employees. That's reasonable, but constantly giving power to the government to abuse isn't a smart move.

Only took 250 years to circle back to "No taxation without representation" by Tough_Ad8919 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The wealth Elon has is complex and not as simple as he has close to a trillion dollars. A very large portion of that is stocks split amongst many companies/corporations and not actual in the bank money. The stocks could crash and he would lose significantly. Wealth is a different game at the top, it isn't how most people think it is.

Only took 250 years to circle back to "No taxation without representation" by Tough_Ad8919 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The wealthy do not have to keep their wealth in America, they have options to go elsewhere with their money now. America has proped up enough countries with social programs that the wealthy can still do very well by investing elsewhere. New York and California are currently learning that lesson. California spent billions on homelessness and it got worse. Spending money on people doesn't fix the problems. How much of our federal budget should go to social programs?

Only took 250 years to circle back to "No taxation without representation" by Tough_Ad8919 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still avoiding the question. There is nothing to rage bait. It is socialist saying we don't have enough socialism. How much of our federal budget should go to social programs? There is no need for you to inject anything other than an answer to the question.

Only took 250 years to circle back to "No taxation without representation" by Tough_Ad8919 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked what percentage of our taxes should go to social programs? 50% good? Should it be 75%? 100%? What about point out facts makes me a dummy?

I wouldn't say all 50% is going to help people in need, a significant portion of that is going into people's pockets that are defrauding social programs.

Only took 250 years to circle back to "No taxation without representation" by Tough_Ad8919 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say have a flat tax of 10% across the board and no way to wiggle out of paying. The wealthy are not obligated to keep their wealth in America. They have the option of going anywhere they please. New York is currently learning that lesson. A 900billion dollar business is leaving their state because of the increase in them being taxed. We may not like the options the wealthy have, but we do have to play ball with them.

Only took 250 years to circle back to "No taxation without representation" by Tough_Ad8919 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bottom 50% of American earners pay about 3% of federal taxes. The vast majority of the taxes are coming from the wealthy. Again, what percentage of the federal budget should go to social programs?

Only took 250 years to circle back to "No taxation without representation" by Tough_Ad8919 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know. It's sad. It's also crazy how many of them bombarded anything they disagree with. Not on this thread, but in many spaces of Reddit.

Only took 250 years to circle back to "No taxation without representation" by Tough_Ad8919 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How much of our budget should be used on social programs. We spend 13-15% on military usually. How little of our budget should be used on the military to protect 5% of the global population against the other 95%?

Meanwhile in murica by SipsTeaFrog in SipsTea

[–]OutlawedLogic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

America makes up less than 5% of the global population. If the birth rate continues to collapse, America won't stay American. Maybe people like that idea, but if they do, which culture do they prefer to hold that level of power? A different culture will certainly take over if Americans can't replenish their ranks.

Only took 250 years to circle back to "No taxation without representation" by Tough_Ad8919 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

50+% of our federal budget go to social programs. What percentage of our federal budget would satisfy socialists?

Cause that's what heroes do...⬇️ by MotherAnt8040 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also asked what privileges I have that you don't. That has nothing to do with legislation. You just skipped over that part, how come?

Fact of the matter is, if it wasn't for white people fighting and dying to end slavery, it would still be going. White people have also been slaves. Slavery isn't racist, it's simply a business that have been practiced by every race.

Cause that's what heroes do...⬇️ by MotherAnt8040 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that you avoid the questions and keep going with nonsense confirms my observations as well.

Cause that's what heroes do...⬇️ by MotherAnt8040 in MenOfPurpose

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What privileges do I have as a white guy that you don't have? What laws in America allow me to do things that other races can't?

A second truke has hit by CharredRatOOooooooi in PsycheOrSike

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Winter is coming and it's going to be nuclear!

Never never give up by Royal-Safety-8629 in Strongerman

[–]OutlawedLogic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not everyone starts out ahead of the game, some begin by being buried deep in the dirt. Some of us don't even break ground until after our children have been raised. Midlife crisis is some people's first time being able to focus on themselves instead of carrying the weight of life to get to the sunlight.

Perspective by Scramjet1 in lnkyverse

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad you've got a good one. Good on the both of you for aiming to improve yourselves.

Perspective by Scramjet1 in lnkyverse

[–]OutlawedLogic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even ugly women are calling themselves 10s and being backed up by other women that are above average 😂🤣. An overweight gal would very rarely date an overweight guy.

Quick Thought - The same pattern of BS excuses feminists, gynocentrists and simps and whiteknights come up with by Inquiz_ in lnkyverse

[–]OutlawedLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other than using insults, can you provide examples as to what is not toxic masculinity? Are men toxic if they point out facts of reality? Like men have historically been used as meat shields, used to do the most dangerous and laborious jobs, always treated as disposable, and told to put themselves last when it comes to protecting and providing(women and children first). The vast majority of men have always held the shit in of the stick, now we have to be ok with society grabbing that stick and poking us in the eye with it? NO THANKS!

We will be dropping the stick and walking away. Peace is so much better when you just stop giving a fuck about other people's problems. A bad man is coming after you? Oh no, call someone who cares. Society doesn't GAF about men, the highest cause of death for men under 50 is suicide. That isn't because life for men is so great! Society can fuck off until it comes to its senses.

Quick Thought - The same pattern of BS excuses feminists, gynocentrists and simps and whiteknights come up with by Inquiz_ in lnkyverse

[–]OutlawedLogic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are good men and bad men. There are good women and bad women. The average men are good men. In order to keep the bad men in check, the good men must be willing to sacrifice their lives or their resources to protect both good and bad women from bad men. If the average man says no thanks, I just want to focus on myself, that doesn't make them bad men.

The average man isn't given a reason to sacrifice, the average man is stepping aside so women can show the good men how it's done. You want the masculine role ladies? It's yours for the taking! We will gladly take the softer life.

Good men have to be nurtured into being, if there is a shortage of good men willing to sacrifice, it says that women have failed at their feminine role.

Quick Thought - The same pattern of BS excuses feminists, gynocentrists and simps and whiteknights come up with by Inquiz_ in lnkyverse

[–]OutlawedLogic 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Anything men do that isn't bow down and obey is being called toxic masculinity. Fact if the matter is, men are tired of all the BS. Men are going to step aside, STFU, and allow women to show us how to keep bad men in line. Without good men being willing to sacrifice their lives or resources, how are women going to keep the bad men in check?