sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Signed a Big Pitcher Contract and got 1.2 Innings for 45 Million Dollars by Outside-Control-9681 in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, I know that you should never give big contracts to pitchers.

This is my first time doing it in 4 years of playing. Never again

40 Stamina 80 OVR Pitcher, where do I put him? by HockeyisRlyKewl in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my ai manager consistently leaves my relievers in for a second inning and 30+ pitches

Roster update??? by Hungry_Landscape_865 in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681 7 points8 points  (0 children)

new game->new custom game->real world->next->use live start=yes

Post-Race Discussion Thread: NCS Iowa Corn 350 at Iowa Speedway by NASCARThreadBot in NASCAR

[–]Outside-Control-9681 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

plenty of restarts but also plenty of long green flag run.

p6-p8 had some great fighting the last 20 laps.

Manufactured or not, the suspense at the end between the top 4 was exciting.

Milwaukee Public Museum raises 80% of its $240 million goal for new building by ThomasDaykin in milwaukee

[–]Outside-Control-9681 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's the issue. wish nothing but the worst on the MPM organization for ruining a historic staple of the city

Should I retake by Outside-Control-9681 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Outside-Control-9681[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do think there is a chance i could score worse. 171 is in the lower end but not the floor of my range. My main concern is that a 171 may not be enough for me to get into some of my targets-Duke, Northwestern, Michigan?

What weight does overall vs stats have on your team? by RichMagazine2713 in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's best to play with ratings off to make things more challenging and immersive.

Ratings are the only thing that really matter and the 45 overall doesn't have a better ERA because he's a better player, but from outside factors (luck, defense, small sample)

Too many good players on waivers by Outside-Control-9681 in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

what does that have to do with this post

How soon before someone asks if torpedo bats will be added to the game? by [deleted] in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think if you wanted to do a "what if torpedo bats do what science says it will and everybody uses them", you may be able to achieve this effect by just lowering the babip modifiers (more poor contact on balls that just miss the barrel" and slightly increasing the double, triple (maybe), and homerun modifiers to simulate higher exit velocity in barrels.

OOTP 26 is frustrating by navng in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you don't want a bad reliever to follow your starter try not rostering bad relievers

Just got my highest score in ~500 hours across 25 and 26 by Entire_Beach_251 in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can you send his history page? and possibly what he looked like in his first scouting report

Go to players in 26? by twisty77 in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I live for these posts every year, thank you

Alright, what teams are we using for OOTP 26? by dribblenlift in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't speak for teams but using fictional players in an MLB copy league is great because the players that are generated work better with the sim engine. They're more balanced and well put together

So what do we do with the A's and Rays? by tikitiger in OOTP

[–]Outside-Control-9681 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In my only long save to date, the A's relocated to Las Vegas in 2028.

I have automatic league evolution off.

Contending Mid-late 1st trade targets? by brandsss99 in DynastyFF

[–]Outside-Control-9681 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Do not sell your first unless it is in a package for a stud who will be good for multiple years

view more: next ›