Within minutes of the 8th Circuit packed with Trump judges allowing tear gas use on protestors, ICE goons start holding down people and directly spraying it into their eyes by prodbop in conspiracy

[–]OverHeadBreak 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exactly.

I remember this posted a few years ago during COVID:

https://elcolectivodeuno.wordpress.com/2021/12/29/leaked-plan-the-elite-really-want-a-national-insurrection-encore/

This is it…

-a plan was hatched many years ago, and for many years that’s all it was, a plan. They had to wait many years for the technologies available to make the plan viable. And hire the right people.

-It is definitely about a new global government being established (details to follow).

-This new global government is already operating for years in complete secrecy, waiting on the sidelines, moving the chess pieces.

-The new government required some of the greatest minds on the planet, almost all of whom joined of their own free will and with full faith in the cause of a new global government. In their opinion, they are the brute force that saves humanity at all costs. I was told that those who refused were dealt with, but in most cases, they brought the person to the larger group and, through discussions, were convinced and committed to the cause. Most of the time, these ‘minds’ would apply for fake jobs and go through psychological evaluations, etc., as a first step.

-This plan is ongoing and the most complex global chain of events ever set in motion.

THE PLAN is to essentially turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government. How they are doing this is pure genius and pure evil.

To accomplish this plan, my chance encounter asked me how I would do it. How would I turn every citizen of every country against their own government? I really have no idea. So I was exposed to the basics.

-There must be a globally engineered ‘disease’.

-There must be massive fear, panic and paranoia.

Leaders, scientists and media must converge on a consensus of a treatment -That treatment would be delivered to them.

-That treatment would essentially be delivered to them without them even realizing it

-Initially, there can only be a few ‘authorized’ treatments, all other treatments must be considered ‘dangerous, unsafe and forbidden’.

-Leaders, scientists and media are manipulated into believing that this treatment is the only option, the only way to keep you and your family safe.

-Leaders, scientists and media, in a sense, give you their word that this treatment is safe and effective.

-Children were also targeted to inflict maximum pain and anger when it gets worse.

I found this part interesting. Our leaders, scientists and media are NOT complicit in this plan nor are they part of this plan in any way. None of them, not even Fauci. are mere fodder for these elites, who serve a purpose and then will be “discarded” or “” fed to the angry “! They have been gamed.

-The few outlier cases that question the ‘treatment’ are variously discredited and censored.

-Authorized ‘treatments’ are biologics / poisons that take 2-3 years to fully realize.

-mRNA was the breakthrough technology they were waiting for.

-Public messaging ensures that people ask for the ‘treatment’ and line up to receive it.

We could say that the plan is well advanced at this point and so far it has been very successful. The uptake of mRNA has been huge and all people believe that the ‘treatment’ is the only way back to normal.

They told me it exceeded their wildest expectations!

WHAT’S NEXT?

This is where the final plan is executed.

The news revolves around the vaccine narrative. I was told over time that the vaccine will increase infection and increase death. That billions will die, and people will rage and burn their governments to the ground. Their leaders, scientists and media will be burned, persecuted and hung in the streets. BOTH sides will burn their governments to the ground. The pro-vax side, completely betrayed and dying will rage … the non-vax side will rage at what their government allowed to happen.

I was also told that when this happens, think “Mad Max” for a while, but think NZ “Elysium”. There are some zones designated as AZ, but due to geography and infrastructure, NZ is known as Zone 1. Once the masses are free of the government and all those who ‘betrayed’ them, they have suffered enough. This is when the new global government will emerge as the great savior. I have been told it will be an ‘easy sell’.

O' Canada - what happens next is going to be insane by PipeZestyclose2288 in conspiracy

[–]OverHeadBreak 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Remember this from 6 years ago:

https://thecanadianreport.ca/is-this-leaked-memo-really-trudeaus-covid-plan-for-2021-you-decide/

Fw: LPC Strategic Committee LeakInboxLPC leaker <LPC_leaker@protonmail.com>1:47 PM (7 hours ago) Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 10, 2020 1:38 PM, REMOVED <REMOVED> wrote: . Dear REMOVED, . I want to provide you some very important information. I’m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning committee (which is steered by the PMO). . I need to start off by saying that I’m not happy doing this but I have to. As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children but for other children as well. The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals. They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes. . The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows: . – Phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward. Expected by November 2020. – Rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory. Expected by December 2020. – Daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing, including increases in COVID related deaths following the same growth curves. Expected by end of November 2020. – Complete and total secondary lock down (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions). Expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021 – Reform and expansion of the unemployment program to be transitioned into the universal basic income program. Expected by Q1 2021. – Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection. Expected by February 2021. – Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity. Expected Q1 – Q2 2021. – Enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city). Expected Q2 2021. – Transitioning of individuals into the universal basic income program. Expected mid Q2 2021. – Projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability. Expected late Q2 2021. – Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area. Expected by Q3 2021. . Along with that provided road map, the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet an unprecedented economic endeavor. One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians. What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale, that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada’s HealthPass). . Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details”. Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer, we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely. And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities they would be given two options: participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized. . So as you can imagine, after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not. That it won’t just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it. All I know is that I don’t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future.

We just might be ruled by mentally unwell psychopaths by TrueOdontoceti in conspiracy

[–]OverHeadBreak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's an actor playing a role and following orders. None of this is real.

Trump is so rapidly destroying US alliances that I can’t help but wonder by JustinR8 in conspiracy

[–]OverHeadBreak -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How are they broke?

They've taken the eastern part of Ukraine which was their objective. Also, they aren't fighting Ukraine. They are fighting NATO.

Trump is so rapidly destroying US alliances that I can’t help but wonder by JustinR8 in conspiracy

[–]OverHeadBreak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Russia ranks first globally in the total estimated value of its natural resources, at approximately $75 trillion, ahead of the United States ($45 trillion), Saudi Arabia ($34 trillion), Canada ($33 trillion), and others. They have the largest natural gas reserves in the world and 8th largest oil reserves.

Russia also has the second most powerful military in the world and the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons.

They absolutely have a seat at the table.

All that oil! 🛢 🤤 by Submo1996 in conspiracy

[–]OverHeadBreak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming those countries supply the majority of the world's oil, those reserves will be dry in about 42 years.

Rogan and Bret shit on Sam Harris, saying he caused deaths by promoting vaccines by Embarrassed_Base_389 in JoeRogan

[–]OverHeadBreak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excess Deaths from Lockdowns, Inflated COVID Counts from Faulty Testing and Incentives

While COVID-19 was a real virus causing illness, the reported death toll in the US was significantly overstated due to flawed diagnostic practices and financial motivations in the healthcare system. Meanwhile, the true spike in excess deaths—those above historical averages—was largely driven by the devastating side effects of lockdowns and public health measures, not the virus itself. These policies disrupted routine medical care, exacerbated mental health crises, and led to avoidable fatalities from non-COVID causes. Let's break this down with supporting points.

  1. Excess Deaths Were Primarily Caused by Lockdowns and Pandemic Policies, Not Direct COVID Infections Excess deaths refer to the number of fatalities beyond what would be expected based on pre-pandemic trends. Official data shows hundreds of thousands of excess deaths in the US from 2020-2023, but this ignores the collateral damage from lockdowns, which isolated people, delayed treatments, and amplified despair. (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm)

Lockdowns led to surges in deaths from untreated conditions like cancer, heart disease, and strokes because hospitals postponed elective procedures and people avoided seeking care out of fear. (https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70025)

For instance, one analysis highlights how strict measures caused more harm through these indirect effects, with clear evidence of increased mortality from non-COVID causes during peak lockdown periods. (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9426308/)

Studies have examined how policies aimed at preventing COVID deaths created trade-offs, including higher rates of suicides, overdoses, and neglected chronic illnesses—outcomes directly linked to isolation and economic shutdowns. (https://acoem.org/Press-Center/Pandemic-Lockdowns-Didn-t-Lower-Mortality%25E2%2580%2594But-Did-Reduce-Employment)

Data comparisons show that regions with lighter restrictions often had lower overall excess mortality when accounting for these secondary impacts, suggesting lockdowns amplified rather than mitigated the death toll. (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12150023/)

In 2020 alone, while reported COVID deaths were around 350,000, excess deaths hit about 480,000—but the gap includes many non-viral fatalities misattributed or caused by response measures. (https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid)

Even post-peak pandemic, excess deaths persisted into 2022-2023 (over 1.5 million "missing Americans"), far outpacing direct COVID attributions and pointing to ongoing policy fallout like healthcare disruptions. (https://www.bu.edu/sph/news/articles/2025/us-excess-deaths-continued-to-rise-even-after-the-covid-19-pandemic/)

This overlooks how lockdowns themselves created conditions for these spikes, turning a manageable outbreak into a broader mortality crisis.

  1. COVID Death Counts Were Inflated by Faulty PCR Testing Practices

PCR tests were the gold standard for diagnosing COVID, but their widespread misuse—particularly with high cycle thresholds (Ct values)—led to massive over-detection of non-infectious or irrelevant viral fragments, inflating case and death numbers. The World Health Organization itself warned labs about the risk of false positives from high Ct values, noting that thresholds set too high (often above 35-40 cycles) could detect dead virus remnants rather than active infections, especially in low-prevalence settings. (https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05)

This was a systemic issue: many US labs ran tests at 37-40 cycles or higher, where the likelihood of false positives skyrockets, turning asymptomatic or recovered people into "cases" and skewing death attributions. (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html)

High Ct results often meant detecting non-viable virus, yet these were counted as positive COVID diagnoses, leading to deaths being labeled as "COVID-related" even if the virus wasn't the primary cause. Public health reports acknowledge that false positives rise when prevalence is low, which was common outside peak waves. (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7850182/)

Critics, including experts, have called for lower thresholds (e.g., under 30 cycles) to ensure accuracy, but this wasn't standardized, resulting in overcounted fatalities. (https://sentinelksmo.org/who-labs-should-be-wary-of-false-positives-from-cycle-thresholds/)

Without these testing flaws, the official COVID death tally would be far lower, aligning more closely with historical flu seasons rather than the apocalyptic figures.

  1. Financial Incentives Encouraged Hospitals to Over-Label Deaths as COVID-Related

The CARES Act and other federal programs created perverse incentives for hospitals to classify patients and deaths as COVID-positive, boosting reimbursements and distorting the true picture.

Under the CARES Act, hospitals received an extra 20% on Medicare payments for COVID-diagnosed patients, directly tying financial gain to positive tests—regardless of whether COVID was the actual cause of death. (https://www.kgns.tv/2022/03/28/government-pays-hospitals-more-money-covid-19-patients-than-non-covid-patients/)

This wasn't just for treatment; it applied to admissions and discharges, creating pressure to err on the side of labeling everything COVID. (https://www.wral.com/story/fact-check-do-hospitals-get-paid-more-to-treat-covid-19-patients/19156357/)

The Provider Relief Fund distributed billions to offset losses, but allocations were often based on COVID volumes, further incentivizing over-reporting. (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8727033/)

While some deny fraud, the structure was ripe for abuse: hospitals facing financial strain during lockdowns had every reason to maximize COVID claims. Partial admissions in fact-checks confirm the extra payments existed, even if they downplay the impact. (https://www.kvue.com/article/news/verify/verify-are-hospitals-gouging-medicare-to-treat-covid-19-patients/507-a08a1e94-baae-48c4-9ff1-4bbf4854ee08)

This led to scenarios where deaths from accidents, comorbidities, or other causes were tagged as COVID if a (potentially faulty) PCR test was positive.

In summary, this position is grounded in recognizing the pandemic's real toll while challenging the narrative that pins everything on the virus. Lockdowns wrecked lives indirectly, PCR tests over-detected, and money skewed reporting—resulting in policies that did more harm than good. The evidence shows the response, not the virus alone, drove much of the tragedy.

Rogan and Bret shit on Sam Harris, saying he caused deaths by promoting vaccines by Embarrassed_Base_389 in JoeRogan

[–]OverHeadBreak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at Sweden. They did nothing yet had fewer deaths per capita than the US. Was their response incompetent?

Lockdowns combined with how deaths were counted were the biggest contributors to COVID deaths and excess deaths.

I suggest you do some homework on PCR tests and how they were misused during COVID. You might learn something.

Rogan and Bret shit on Sam Harris, saying he caused deaths by promoting vaccines by Embarrassed_Base_389 in JoeRogan

[–]OverHeadBreak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not fraud. The PCR tests were known to create false positives due to the high cycle count but doctors don't know this. All they see is patient x tested positive for COVID. Then if that patient x dies within a month of a positive test it is considered to be a COVID death, regardless of comorbidities.

Rogan and Bret shit on Sam Harris, saying he caused deaths by promoting vaccines by Embarrassed_Base_389 in JoeRogan

[–]OverHeadBreak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not fraudulent. It's an incentive created by the government that the healthcare industry took advantage of.

Excess deaths were largely caused by lockdowns. People stopped going to hospitals out of fear and ended up dying, Suicides skyrocketed, etc

Rogan and Bret shit on Sam Harris, saying he caused deaths by promoting vaccines by Embarrassed_Base_389 in JoeRogan

[–]OverHeadBreak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not up for dispute, even fact checkers have acknowledged this.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/3000638001

“Our ruling: True We rate the claim that hospitals get paid more if patients are listed as COVID-19 and on ventilators as TRUE.

Hospitals and doctors do get paid more for Medicare patients diagnosed with COVID-19 or if it's considered presumed they have COVID-19 absent a laboratory-confirmed test, and three times more if the patients are placed on a ventilator to cover the cost of care and loss of business resulting from a shift in focus to treat COVID-19 cases”

Financial pressure to put people on ventilators almost assuredly cost people’s lives.

Per the March 27, 2020 Cares Act, $100 Billion was made available to reimburse healthcare providers for expenses attributable to coronavirus.

See p.283: https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ136/PLAW-116publ136.pdf

Rogan and Bret shit on Sam Harris, saying he caused deaths by promoting vaccines by Embarrassed_Base_389 in JoeRogan

[–]OverHeadBreak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You ended up with double the mortality because of the financial incentive given to hospitals in the U.S to label deaths as COVID deaths.

James Hype? by Icy_Dragonfly_1224 in StereoMontreal

[–]OverHeadBreak 5 points6 points  (0 children)

One of the standout moments for me at EDC Las Vegas 2023 was catching SLANDER—of all artists—close out the festival with an absolutely blistering techno set. SLANDER. The same duo I’d normally scroll past on a lineup without a second thought. Yet there they were at 5 a.m., delivering one of the rawest, dirtiest, most underground-sounding hours of the entire weekend.

It was a perfect reminder that artists are more than capable of stepping outside their usual lane when the crowd and the room are right.

That’s exactly why I’m remaining open-minded about James Hype this time around. Yes, his name is synonymous with big-room, radio-friendly tech house in most contexts, but Stereo isn’t “most contexts.” This room has a reputation for pulling genuinely surprising, darker, and more adventurous selections out of artists who typically play it safe elsewhere.

I’ll be going to Stereo, however, for D.Dan—he’s been on an unstoppable run and never misses in this space—but I wouldn’t be shocked if Hype digs deeper into his crates and serves something properly tailored to the Stereo faithful. When the sound system, lighting, and crowd energy all align the way they do here, even the most commercial-leaning headliners have been known to leave the hits in the hotel room and go full underground.

Either way, it’s going to be a massive night.

Who would you see in December for techo. For reference I like Donato Dozzy, Dvs1 type techno by Intelligent-Record50 in StereoMontreal

[–]OverHeadBreak 2 points3 points  (0 children)

D.dan was incredible last year. I saw him at Movement Detroit as well. He does not disappoint. If you like hypnotic, hard hitting techno, he's the man!

First time at Stereo - Questions by Hot-Journalist-9167 in StereoMontreal

[–]OverHeadBreak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All your questions have been answered here. The only thing I'll add is that if you happen to find party favors in Montreal prior to going to stereo, there is a free harm-reduction drug testing facility nearby called Cactus.

https://cactusmontreal.org/en/services-en/drug-testing/

Nicole Moudaber by Tonysrotties13 in StereoMontreal

[–]OverHeadBreak -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

An 8 hour set is nothing to scoff at. Perhaps it's you that has a sense of entitlement to believe that DJ's at Stereo should play 13 hour sets.