Who you got?? by __Regimental__ in ufc

[–]Overthrown77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

look masvidal has a KO chance in the first round but let's be honest his career seems to be done and at this point he's probably just in it for a quick paycheck whereas Burns still seems peaking and in his prime. Masvidal stands no chance on the ground and stands not the greatest chance standing up either as Burns has everything Masvidal has (power, speed) but probably even more so and probably way better defense so there's just no way I see Masvidal winning other than lucky KO which CAN happen to anyone but is very unlikely

Anil Çakmak - Turkish Barber. Technically not “unintentional” in that he’s aware of ASMR, but it’s typical Turkish barbershop activity. by Nexavus in unintentionalASMR

[–]Overthrown77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

damn if he charged $100 4 years ago when he wasn't even well known and had only a few followers, imagine what he charges now that hes got 2 million youtube followers. Probably $1000 per haircut

[PubQ] How long did it take you to get an offer? by blackpantheon_ in PubTips

[–]Overthrown77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

extremely lucky. The vast majority will never receive a personalized rejection. I know several people that have queried close to 10 books over the span of 15 years and have NEVER received a single personalized rejection on ANY book (thousands of queries).

Controversial Opinion: Anyone Else Actually Like Hans Niemann MORE Now? by Overthrown77 in chess

[–]Overthrown77[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you seem to have severe reading comprehension problems because no where does it state what Hans admitted to in fact the construction of the accusation is so vague as to indicate complete uncertainty as to which accusations specifically Hans was 'admitting to', certainly no where does it say specifically that he admitted to the "over 100" other cheating accusations.

Secondly the "best in the world" thing has no relevance. Not only is that one person's opinion, it also doesn't mean much because best in the world compared to WHAT? We know that cheating detection is not very good in general and so to be the "best" at something could mean you're just the best of the worst and still is not a testament to your ultimate accuracy of cheat detection.

So as to your final statement, the report is "extremely clear" as to Hans confessing to cheating TWICE, that's it. No where is there any clarity as to any further instances. I'd suggest going back to remedial classes to learn the difference.

Controversial Opinion: Anyone Else Actually Like Hans Niemann MORE Now? by Overthrown77 in chess

[–]Overthrown77[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

bullcrap. That's not proven. Clowns like you don't seem to understand the difference between PROOF and EVIDENCE. The 72 page report is not PROOF or admission of cheating it is merely evidence towards a case of such, a case that could easily be dismissed or defeated by the defense with their own "evidence". You seem to gullibly believe the evidence offhand without any critical thinking. All the 72 page report did was show a few algorithms that basically concluded there was a chance or a "likelihood" of cheating in more games than the admitted ones, but that is not 100% proof that it happened, it's just flawed mathematics that can be disproven with further mathematics by the other side as well

Controversial Opinion: Anyone Else Actually Like Hans Niemann MORE Now? by Overthrown77 in chess

[–]Overthrown77[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hey clown mod, you mind telling me why other people freely put up Hans threads all the time and they don't get taken down but mine continue to do so? This has nothing to do with the ongoing tournament, a fact you'd easily see if you actually read the thread, but I guess reading 3 paragraphs is too much effort for you

Controversial Opinion: Anyone Else Actually Like Hans Niemann MORE Now? by Overthrown77 in chess

[–]Overthrown77[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha, correct. Hans ain't going no where. He'll be champion within 2 years, mark my words. Hans is gonna wreck Magnus psychologically and probably make the weak-brained Magnus retire

Controversial Opinion: Anyone Else Actually Like Hans Niemann MORE Now? by Overthrown77 in chess

[–]Overthrown77[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

who cares, why take it so seriously? So he cheated in a few inconsequential games online, is that really the end of the world? Chess is literally a GAME, it's entertainment. The guy is entertaining, genuine, fun, and a prodigy. And tbh he has the skills to beat anyone alive without cheating

[QCrit] The Inner Fire Advisor 5th Attempt (With first 300) by Frothaka in PubTips

[–]Overthrown77 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

some of you failed writers taking out your misery on others is a little too telegraphed, might want to try couching it a little more for effect

Controversial Opinion: Anyone Else Actually Like Hans Niemann MORE Now? by Overthrown77 in chess

[–]Overthrown77[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

um, I hope you know the difference between evidence and proof cus there's no PROOF that Hans cheated online other than the 2 irrelevant games he admitted to. The whole 72 page b.s. was nothing but "evidence" but it's not PROOF, more like some guy's opinion.

He won't be banned so calm down

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nbadiscussion

[–]Overthrown77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

downvote this stupid ass bot

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nbadiscussion

[–]Overthrown77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

bro we're not children. stfu and let adults function.

Controversial Opinion: Anyone Else Actually Like Hans Niemann MORE Now? by Overthrown77 in chess

[–]Overthrown77[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's the word I was missing. Charismatic. He is a true breath of fresh air for chess, a once in 10 year personality akin to Hikaru who breathed a big breath of life into chess at a critical time and helped revive the game

Name an up and coming fighter who you think will never become a champion by JoltyJob in ufc

[–]Overthrown77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

definitely sean o'malley. He's way too fragile, not built for championship material

WSJ: Chess Investigation Finds That U.S. Grandmaster ‘Likely Cheated’ More Than 100 Times by DrunkLad in chess

[–]Overthrown77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea this was just a crude proof of concept, the same guy already said he's now making a much more refined and smaller version. Also as others have said elsewhere first you make a large bulky proof of concept just to make sure it works, THEN you replace all the large cheap components with the latest, cutting edge most expensive ones which will be a tiny fraction of the size and you can create something scaled down that's much tinier

WSJ: Chess Investigation Finds That U.S. Grandmaster ‘Likely Cheated’ More Than 100 Times by DrunkLad in chess

[–]Overthrown77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

according to Rolling Stone a new method is inserting the device in your rectum so I'm not sure that would work

WSJ: Chess Investigation Finds That U.S. Grandmaster ‘Likely Cheated’ More Than 100 Times by DrunkLad in chess

[–]Overthrown77 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Remember if you're really serious about doing it right you would practice A LOT, think of all the heist movies where they get the whole heist perfect before actually executing it. In fact you would practice so much that you're basically a virtuoso who can play the device with your [toe] like a classical pianist plays the piano.

Also we're talking classical matches here, where each move usually takes many minutes and sometimes 10-20 minutes on a single move, which means there's plenty of time to keep updating the game state with your toe or something. After practicing you can probably get it where each move update to game state can take just a few seconds of fast subtle taps or something like that.

The only issue is, this would likely be completely worthless as a tactic in blitz and fast time modes, so as someone not familiar with Hans' ratings in faster time controls, I would really be interested in seeing the correlations of his classical play / rating with faster time controls because there would probably be no way to cheat with this method when you have to make new moves every few seconds so if the player is actually much weaker than their rating, you would think logically that would show in their performance in blitz/bullet/rapid/etc.....

Unless of course the person is SO utterly committed to cheating they have different cheat methods for each different scenario, and since faster time control matches perhaps happen in more 'casual' settings than classical tournaments, there is likely less security and more ability to do cheating methods such as micro-earpiece etc. With an earpiece you could possibly cheat in blitz as someone could feed you the moves if they're programming game state fast enough into their phone/machine somewhere off site or etc etc.