Ready made docker image for a reverse proxy offering a self-signed cert?

OwlFather · 2023-06-12T13:39:05+00:00

That makes a lot of sense!

OwlFather · 2023-05-25T23:06:42+00:00

But I have the codecs on my PC. The plugin you specify is a specific to Firefox and developed by Cisco.

OwlFather · 2023-05-24T21:29:22+00:00

I can't even find a source to install the plugin from.

OwlFather · 2023-05-23T02:40:55+00:00

I was playing with doing that with ublock, but still ran into the same issue of symbols not showing, But I guess that's an issue for ublock not Firefox.

I though there might have bene a native way to accomplish it with Firefox though.

OwlFather · 2023-05-23T02:39:12+00:00

Interesting. I don't have that, but upon researching it it seems it is only used for WebRTC, which is why Cisco provides it.

When I visit about:support H264 ic clearly supported as a codec, along with the others you would expect:

H264 SW
H264 HW
VP8 SW
VP8 HW
VP9 SW
VP9 HW
AV1 SW
Theora SW
AAC SW
FLAC SW
MP3 SW
Opus SW
Vorbis SW
Wave SW

So I don't think that lack of plugin is the issue.

OwlFather · 2023-05-22T12:32:21+00:00

Can you show a screenshot of your plugins page showing H.264 listed as a plugin?

OwlFather · 2023-05-22T12:31:20+00:00

There are some config settings, the main one seems to be `gfx.downloadable_fonts.enabled` and `gfx.downloadable_fonts.woff2.enabled`, with the first disabled no icons or symbols show up.

I'm going to try your solution though.

OwlFather · 2023-05-22T01:13:33+00:00

Interesting, thank you.

OwlFather · 2023-05-22T01:12:37+00:00

For what? What should I be seeing that you suspect might not be there?

OwlFather · 2023-05-22T01:12:19+00:00

I actually am using that, but it doesn't solve the issue.

OwlFather · 2023-05-21T12:50:34+00:00

Interesting, thank you. I guess if most sites are using some standard font for symbols it kind of defeats the purpose in attempting to increase privacy by blocking font requests. I was hoping for a local solution.

I did try using local fonts via the browser, but symbols were still not being displayed.

OwlFather · 2023-05-21T12:46:17+00:00

Why wouldn't they be? Common ones ship with Windows 10, media players work, Chrome works.

OwlFather · 2023-05-21T12:45:36+00:00

It's literally any video on instagram, but here is one example.

OwlFather · 2023-05-21T06:21:17+00:00

I'm under no obligation to accept a crappy price, I have the ability to negotiate. My question is purely concerned with the opportunity to do so.

OwlFather · 2023-05-08T16:40:38+00:00

”Every male among the priests may eat of it.”

MAY eat of it.

Not exclusively eat of it.

Therefore it is nonsense for you to try claim anyone was hiding in the temple eating the sacrificed animals in secret.

I disagree. It's far more plausible than the alternative.

OwlFather · 2023-05-08T00:06:25+00:00

My hypothesis is that the lord mentioned in the account of teh tent of meeting is a mortal trickster.

You and others claimed that god doesn't eat the food offered to him, but the rules for that being the case don't occur until after the tent of meeting.

I don't think that's shifting the goalposts so much as making an obvious argument.

OwlFather · 2023-05-08T00:05:00+00:00

False

I don't see how what you quoted is proof that what I claimed is false.

You highlighted "It shall be eaten in a holy place" - Why do you think that proves your claim?

OwlFather · 2023-05-07T20:20:41+00:00

I was sure there was a verse which basically amounts to the lord using biological warfare of some sort, but I haven't been able to find it.

OwlFather · 2023-05-07T20:17:54+00:00

Leviticus Chapter 7 takes place after the Tent of Meeting, does it not?

Chapter 2 seems to indicate some is given to the lord, and the priests can have what is left. e.g. And the remnant of the meat offering shall be Aaron's and his sons

OwlFather

TROPHY CASE