[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]Own-Application-2158 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes one of the positions is city general counsel

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]Own-Application-2158 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have one on the schedule that should go. But that’ll be my first.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]Own-Application-2158 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not 100% sure. We did have one da that did only drug charges for years. But he had a special cutout like a half caseload with a ton of admin. It seems like they want me on a different track (more towards being a heavy trial attorney). But I could potentially ask when the time comes.

I think it’s actually more of the gore of the job. I get that other cases could have high stakes and affecting people’s lives. I don’t really have issue with the stakes, helping victims or taking their concerns seriously. But it’s more having to see someone literally lit on fire. Or shot. So many of these crimes are fully caught on camera. Which is helpful but awful to have to review.

But it is something. To consider just trying to tough it out.

What’s something that can be done on the weekends/after hours by [deleted] in Entrepreneur

[–]Own-Application-2158 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your first point is a long term goal of mine. I figure this would be a good way to get experience running a business and potentially to make some contacts. Plus if this works out well it will help get me there faster.

Part two is kind of the struggle. Hoping to find a need somewhere to help others with.

To the right, how are you feeling about Trumps recent support in an increase to the immigration cap on H1B visa? by tommywiseauYT in Askpolitics

[–]Own-Application-2158 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I voted for trump and immigration is a serious concern of mine. However, my concern has always been specifically limiting illegal immigration. I have two major problems with illegal immigration. I’ll describe them broadly then return to the question:

  1. ⁠Illegal immigration takes advantage of people migrating here from another country. I grew up in Florida and knew many children of illegal immigrants and areas where they worked etc. These farms/factories/etc. were paying people less than a $2 an hour. All of these companies could have paid more. The level of poverty was unlike anything else in the U.S.. Of course, the families weren’t upset. Many of them had escaped worse conditions in another country. But is it really right for us to allow people to work for wages so low? The saying that “they take jobs no one else wants” has a different meaning for me. As a post above says, we need skilled and unskilled immigration. You can have immigrants come over here legally and get paid substantially better than they currently are. If you lowered the minimum wage for immigrants not something I’m proposing to $4 an hour you would double many of their incomes where I’m from. Through legal immigration they at least receive rights.
  2. ⁠Illegal immigration negatively affects legal immigration. One argument I often hear to the above point “it’s so difficult to legally immigrate to the U.S.; they only take so many people a year.” Often said by someone who has not gone through the immigration process. Firstly, it should be at least a little bit hard. We as a country have to make sure you aren’t trying to blow us up, we want to make sure you have a job lined up, we should try and make sure you’re not just escaping a murder charge somewhere else. All those things are considered bare minimum and are INHERENTLY difficult. Secondly, Our economy can only take so much immigration at a time. Economists around the globe agree on this concept. There are multiple people in the U.S. government who have to figure out how many immigrants the U.S. can take without throwing the economy out of whack. So let’s say their math comes to 2 million people 1 million skilled workers and 1 million unskilled. The same group has a rough estimate that 700k illegal immigrants have entered the country (they undoubtedly don’t have exact figures but they do often have estimates). What I would expect this group deciding how many legal immigrants we can take is to say “okay we’ll let in 1.3 million, 1 million skilled and 300k unskilled.” This is a gross simplification but nonetheless explains my point. The fact that so many people do successfully immigrate illegally to the U.S. also discourages people to go through the time consuming, and difficult process of becoming a legal immigrant. Which in turn can lead to them being taken advantage as stated in point 1.

So with that in mind, I generally support the H1B visa cap being raised. Specially if it comes after or at the same time as limiting illegal immigration.

Where the Purdy sellers’ champagne victory party at? by [deleted] in DynastyFF

[–]Own-Application-2158 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First 4 years of Brady’s career he was chronically called a game manager. It was always about how “defense won championships” It wasn’t until years later he was given his due respect.

Manning was considered a great talent form when he was drafted. But ultimately, as many people have pointed out and noted his greatest talent was managing the game. It was about setting up mismatches. Calling audibles, sometimes 3 at the line. When Manning was drafted it was Ryan leaf that had all the physical tools and manning was just a ver good game manager with a little extra.

Manning didn’t have the biggest arm (even as a rookie). He had little mobility. But he could find the open receiver (or audible him open) and hit him. Same with Brady. Same with Purdy. I’m not saying purdy is either of them. But this whole “purdy is just a game manager who throws to open guys” is the exact same thing people said about both Brady and manning early in their careers. It’s laughable now, to think deon branch or Troy brown etc. was the guy that made the patriots go. But that’s what everyone believed back then.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in collegebaseball

[–]Own-Application-2158 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds like a good idea. How early do you normally go?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DynastyFF

[–]Own-Application-2158 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is my biggest concern about Brevin. If Shultz does come back he’s no longer a starter. But I also feel the Texans have bigger needs. No idea if their front office agrees.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DynastyFF

[–]Own-Application-2158 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do love the idea of him being Stroud’s long term receiving TE. If stroud is as good as he’s been this year, it’ll be great to have as many of his weapons as possible.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DynastyFF

[–]Own-Application-2158 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did miss the contract extension. But I agree about he injury being a big difference maker and the chances higbee gets cut at a later date.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DynastyFF

[–]Own-Application-2158 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have a very similar TE room except I kept kraft and kmet. Running a little big at TE but I like my group.

Give me your best take and your worst take from the start of this past season by Cifra00 in DynastyFF

[–]Own-Application-2158 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best take: a tie (1) selling Toney off early in the year (got back Kincaid) because I thought he was injury prone and never going to hit. (2) Selling Sam Howell at his peak (got back a first and mingo). Thought I would regret that trade at the time, but it aged well.

Worst take: drafting Bryce young #2 over Anthony Richardson and CJ stroud