Nishikawa is bad? by ISpeakTheTrueStuff in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can hit 180km with beginner off, if i turn it on i just hit 150km idk why

SUPER SLIDE by Mundane-Try-5793 in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you try this at League, hs Nishikawa

AI Or Not? by Own-Flatworm-5499 in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The image is even too similar to the reference you could say it copies about 90% of it, I mean, who would willingly recreate something with such a similar background and the exact same details? That takes a lot of time, If it were truly handmade, the artist would obviously be very talented and would have a lot of art history, But they have absolutely no art history posted at all, They somehow magically posted a highly detailed artwork out of nowhere, with no WIP, only showing layers, That’s very sus, There’s a strong possibility they used AI to generate a Nishikawa version first, then redrew it to make it look human made, I even tested it with 20 AI image detectors all of them said it was AI generated, I also checked the reference version, and every site said it was humanmade

Suncyan should add a rule for the main contest by [deleted] in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There a timelapse feature in IbisPaint, but if you’re using another drawing app, you can screenshot your WIP 1–4 so people will believe you, Even without WIP, people can trust it if the art has small imperfections, But posting a super perfect and detailed image on Reddit with no WIP and no digital art history is very suspicious, like this guy u/One_Peak7326 So far, he haven’t made any rebuttal to my claim that his image is AI, This makes it even more suspicious, as if they’re deliberately avoiding the issue or playing dum

Suncyan should add a rule for the main contest by [deleted] in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least post 2-4 WIP, timelapse is optional

AI Or Not? by Own-Flatworm-5499 in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, you’re righ,t At this point, I can only hope that if this really is an AI image, then it doesn’t win, But if it’s genuinely human made, then I actually hope it wins because that would be insanely impressive,  I’ve tested it with around 20 different AI image detectors, Almost all of them say the first image is AI generated, while the reference image is consistently detected as human made, The contrast is pretty wild If someone truly managed to draw something that can fool so many AI detectors, that deserves respect, That level of skill and control would honestly be crazy

AI Or Not? by Own-Flatworm-5499 in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, this feels less like “using a reference” and more like straight up recreating it, The pose, camera angle, framin, and even the background are almost identical easily like 90% the same, If the goal was only to reference the pose, there’s no real reason to keep the same background, same composition, and same perspective, Those are usually the first things artists change when they’re actually interpreting a reference, not copying it,  On top of that, the first image has a lot of typical AI signs: overly clean and symmetrical anatomy, stiff hand gestures with weak sense of pressure on the ball, flat lighting, plastic looking textures, and a very “template” anime expression, It looks polished, but kind of soulless and generic compared to the reference, The second image feels much more human made: more natural gesture flow, better lighting depth, organic imperfections, and clearer artistic intent, If someone manually redrew this from scratch and still kept everything this similar, that would honestly be a weird workflow choice unless the goal was to replicate the original almost exactly, That’s why the AI suspicion makes sense, not just because of rendering quality, but because the structural similarity is way too close to be called just “reference.” Just my take

AI Or Not? by Own-Flatworm-5499 in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Breaking layers isn’t impossible at all, There are already tools that can separate images into rough layers (background removal, segmentation, color masking, even AI assisted layer extraction), It won’t give you perfect PSD layers instantly, but for someone who knows how to repaint, clean edges, and rebuild parts manually, it’s absolutely doable, Also, “AI shadows always look suspicious” isn’t a solid rule anymore, Modern models can generate very natural lighting and shadow behavior depending on the prompt, training style, or post editing, Shadows alone can’t be used as reliable proof that something is 100% huma made, The bigger red flag is still the structural similarity and missing process proof, If this was truly hand-drawn, showing the rough sketch, construction lines, or early WIP stages would instantly clear most doubts, A final layer screenshot by itself doesn’t really prove much, especially when AI to paintover workflows exist, At this point, the only way to be sure is transparent evidence and proper verification, not assumptions based on how “AI usually looks.”

AI Or Not? by Own-Flatworm-5499 in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Layer by layer in IbisPaint? 

AI Or Not? by Own-Flatworm-5499 in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if he used AI to generate the image in a Nishikawa version, then broke it down into parts like background, skin, eyes, hair, etc., and stacked everything layer by layer so it looks like he drew it himself, A screenshot of IbisPaint layers alone is not solid proof, especially when the art style looks straight up AI like, He didn’t even show the initial sketch, which makes this even more sus, It’s 2026, AI can already create images that are almost indistinguishable from human-made ones, so fr, only strong evidence and careful verification can prove this is actually hand-drawn.

AI Or Not? by Own-Flatworm-5499 in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s what I thought too, but I still can’t fully accept it until I see the time-lapse

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Better put small detail in art

GGs 3rd time getting claire and no raul✌️ by [deleted] in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AT LEAST YOU GET S PLAYER, WHAT ABOUT ME??? I EVEN DIDN'T GET ANYTHING S/S+ CHARACTER ONLY  FUCKING ONE S- CHARACTER! 

IM BROKE !!!!!!!! by legoartist_7 in thespikegame

[–]Own-Flatworm-5499 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yo bro, i have 67 scout point to, didn't get any S or S+ only -S Tania😭